Debates between Nigel Huddleston and Tim Loughton during the 2019-2024 Parliament

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Nigel Huddleston and Tim Loughton
Thursday 18th May 2023

(1 year, 6 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Tim Loughton Portrait Tim Loughton (East Worthing and Shoreham) (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

11. Whether her Department has provided recent guidance to companies negotiating contracts with Chinese-owned businesses.

Nigel Huddleston Portrait The Minister of State, Department for Business and Trade (Nigel Huddleston)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

Our bilateral trade with China was worth £111 billion last year. The Department provides expert guidance to help UK companies succeed in China, ranging from specialised support through the export support service to practical assistance from our extensive overseas network. We will continue to support engagement, while ensuring our national security and values are protected.

Tim Loughton Portrait Tim Loughton
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

This House has voted to recognise the genocide by China. This House has passed legislation to limit companies doing business in Xinjiang and to restrict Chinese companies getting involved in sensitive UK infrastructure projects, including Hikvision, which has over a million security cameras in this country and just reported an increase in sales in this country of more 50%. What message does it send when a UK trade Minister, from the Minister’s team, goes to Beijing, feting Chinese Ministers for Chinese investment in the UK, as if the golden age of UK-China relations was still a thing?

Nigel Huddleston Portrait Nigel Huddleston
- View Speech - Hansard - -

My hon. Friend raises many important points, but the key thing is that the relationship with China has been laid out recently in the integrated review, the integrated review refresh and in the Foreign Secretary’s speech, and we have made it very clear that we need to balance our trading interests with our national security interests, for the very reasons that my hon. Friend outlines.