Debates between Michael Fabricant and Jeremy Wright during the 2015-2017 Parliament

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Michael Fabricant and Jeremy Wright
Thursday 27th October 2016

(7 years, 7 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Michael Fabricant Portrait Michael Fabricant (Lichfield) (Con)
- Hansard - -

Is it not fallacious for the remoaners to always say that once we have left the European Union, we will not have access to European institutions? Is it not the case that Europol, the Erasmus programme and the Eurovision song contest all have members who are not members of the European Union?

Jeremy Wright Portrait The Attorney General
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I do not think that by grouping them together my hon. Friend is describing Eurovision as a criminal enterprise—although there are those who may say so. It is important, as he says, to recognise that leaving the European Union is not the same as leaving Europe, and it is certainly not the same as being unprepared to co-operate. We will be co-operating with a whole range of partners, because, as I have said, it will be in our mutual interest.

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Michael Fabricant and Jeremy Wright
Thursday 26th May 2016

(8 years ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Jeremy Wright Portrait The Attorney General
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The hon. Gentleman will appreciate, I am sure, that there is more than one body in the system that prosecutes fraud. The Serious Fraud Office deals only with the most complex and difficult cases, so it is not surprising that of all the cases reported, not all of which will be prosecuted by anyone, it deals with only a small proportion. It is set up to deal with the most difficult and complex cases, and that is what it does.

Michael Fabricant Portrait Michael Fabricant (Lichfield) (Con)
- Hansard - -

14. Is it not important that not only the Serious Fraud Office but all other Government agencies have access to communications data in order to ensure convictions?

Jeremy Wright Portrait The Attorney General
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My hon. Friend is entirely right. Communications data are important in the prosecution of all types of offending. For example, the vast majority of prosecutions in terrorism cases involve such data, but they are also used in relation to fraud. That is why the Investigatory Powers Bill currently before the House is so important.