Information between 23rd August 2026 - 12th September 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Thursday 10th September 2026 Baroness Berger (Labour - Life peer) Oral questions - Main Chamber Subject: Proposed legislation in Australia to permit individuals to disable algorithms on social media View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
9 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Berger voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 150 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 248 Noes - 163 |
|
7 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Berger voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 144 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 76 Noes - 164 |
|
7 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Berger voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 151 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 69 Noes - 171 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Baroness Berger speeches from: Australia: Social Media Algorithms
Baroness Berger contributed 2 speeches (137 words) Thursday 10th September 2026 - Lords Chamber Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport |
|
Baroness Berger speeches from: Data Security: UK Citizens
Baroness Berger contributed 1 speech (87 words) Tuesday 8th September 2026 - Lords Chamber |
|
Baroness Berger speeches from: Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill
Baroness Berger contributed 5 speeches (1,436 words) Committee stage Thursday 3rd September 2026 - Grand Committee Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport |
|
Baroness Berger speeches from: Schools: Mobile Phone Policy
Baroness Berger contributed 1 speech (94 words) Wednesday 2nd September 2026 - Lords Chamber Department for International Development |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Government Departments: Digital Service Providers
Asked by: Baroness Berger (Labour - Life peer) Tuesday 1st September 2026 Question to the Cabinet Office: To ask His Majesty's Government what proportion of the computing and cloud services used by government departments are provided by suppliers that are (1) headquartered outside the UK, or (2) subject to the jurisdiction of a government outside the UK. Answered by Baroness Twycross - Parliamentary Secretary (Cabinet Office) This information is not held centrally. Individual government departments are responsible for managing their own commercial arrangements for computing and cloud services and would need to confirm the proportion of services provided by suppliers headquartered outside the UK. |
|
Health Hazards: Fire Resistant Materials
Asked by: Baroness Berger (Labour - Life peer) Friday 4th September 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of evidence linking chemical flame retardants to developmental and neurological impacts in children. Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) The Committee on Toxicity of Chemicals in Food, Consumer Products and the Environment (COT) has considered the available evidence for phosphate-based flame retardants (PFRs) and the potential for neurodevelopmental effects in children and the developing foetus. PFRs were introduced in the United Kingdom as an alternative to brominated flame retardants as some of these were banned from use or restricted. The COT reviewed the potential for PFRs to act via similar mechanisms to organophosphate (OP) compounds, such as OP pesticides, as they have some structural similarities. Overall, the COT concluded that the available evidence indicates that PFRs do not pose a risk of developmental toxicity at anticipated exposure levels and that PFRs were very unlikely to share the neurodevelopmental effects of other OP compounds. However, the COT could not exclude the possibility that PFRs could produce neurodevelopmental toxicity by some other mechanism. Further information is available in the COT’s Statement on phosphate-based flame retardants and the potential for neurodevelopmental toxicity, a copy of which is attached. |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
10 Sep 2026, 11:52 a.m. - House of Lords " Fourth Oral Question Baroness Berger. question, standing in my name on the Order Paper. " Oral questions: Proposed legislation in Australia to permit individuals to disable algorithms on social media Baroness Berger (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Parliamentary Research |
|---|
|
Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill 2026-27 - CBP-12181
Sep. 04 2026 Found: life care Select committee, October to November 2025 At the end of the second reading debate, Baroness Berger |