Lord Wei Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Lord Wei

Information between 11th October 2025 - 20th November 2025

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
14 Oct 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Wei voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 161 Conservative Aye votes vs 2 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 192 Noes - 239
14 Oct 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Wei voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 162 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 204 Noes - 215
14 Oct 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Wei voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 142 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 169 Noes - 212
15 Oct 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Wei voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 117 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 139 Noes - 186
15 Oct 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Wei voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 163 Conservative Aye votes vs 2 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 200 Noes - 194
21 Oct 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Wei voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 162 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 262 Noes - 157
21 Oct 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Wei voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 167 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 270 Noes - 160
21 Oct 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Wei voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 103 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 138 Noes - 138
21 Oct 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Wei voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 136 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 212 Noes - 144
21 Oct 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Wei voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 158 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 253 Noes - 153
22 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Wei voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 156 Conservative Aye votes vs 1 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 246 Noes - 169
22 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Wei voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 145 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 163 Noes - 236
28 Oct 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Wei voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 158 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 240 Noes - 143
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Wei voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 181 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 201 Noes - 238
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Wei voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 179 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 193 Noes - 236
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Wei voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 185 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 207 Noes - 240


Written Answers
Home Education
Asked by: Lord Wei (Conservative - Life peer)
Tuesday 4th November 2025

Question to the Department for Education:

To ask His Majesty's Government whether the Department for Education has issued any guidance, formal or informal, to further education colleges or local authorities encouraging them to restrict direct applications from electively home educated students aged 14–16 to avoid any administrative burdens which might be placed on them by the Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill; and if not, what steps they are taking to ensure that public statements by such institutions do not misrepresent government policy.

Answered by Baroness Smith of Malvern - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions)

​​The department has not issued any guidance, formal or informal, to further education colleges or local authorities encouraging them to restrict direct applications from electively home educated children.

​Home educating parents can supplement their child’s education through attendance at part-time further education courses, as part of securing an efficient, full-time and suitable education for their child. The department supports parents’ right to exercise this choice, and this position will not change with the implementation of the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill.

​Decisions regarding the availability of such courses are at the discretion of each college, who may make decisions based on factors such as available capacity and resources, and may liaise with their local authority as part of this. Funding for part-time courses below level 3 is available to colleges so long as the 14-16 funding arrangements detailed in the funding rates and formula guidance are followed.

​To support implementation of Bill measures, the department will issue statutory guidance to aid local authorities and parents.​

Schools: Attendance
Asked by: Lord Wei (Conservative - Life peer)
Wednesday 12th November 2025

Question to the Department for Education:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Early Education on 30 May (HC50978) which stated that they were conducting a data protection impact assessment and further to remarks by Baroness Smith of Malvern on 22 May (HL Deb col 443) stating they were consulting the Information Commissioner’s Office in connection with the ‘child not in school’ registers, when they plan to publish that data protection impact assessment, and whether it will cover the use of consistent identifiers.

Answered by Baroness Smith of Malvern - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions)

The department intends to publish the Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) for the Children Not in School (CNIS) registers prior to their implementation. We are continuing to engage with the Information Commissioner’s Office on the DPIA to ensure that all data protection risks have been identified and mitigated before any processing of data begins.




Lord Wei mentioned

Live Transcript

Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm.

20 Oct 2025, 10:13 p.m. - House of Lords
"guidance is advisory, and who is going to enforce it? My Noble friend Lord Wei Catherine. >> And I have. >> Spent enough time dealing with "
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript