Information between 17th September 2025 - 6th November 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
14 Oct 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Wei voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 161 Conservative Aye votes vs 2 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 192 Noes - 239 |
|
14 Oct 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Wei voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 162 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 204 Noes - 215 |
|
14 Oct 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Wei voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 142 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 169 Noes - 212 |
|
15 Oct 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Wei voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 117 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 139 Noes - 186 |
|
15 Oct 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Wei voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 163 Conservative Aye votes vs 2 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 200 Noes - 194 |
|
21 Oct 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Wei voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 162 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 262 Noes - 157 |
|
21 Oct 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Wei voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 167 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 270 Noes - 160 |
|
21 Oct 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Wei voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 103 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 138 Noes - 138 |
|
21 Oct 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Wei voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 136 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 212 Noes - 144 |
|
21 Oct 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Wei voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 158 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 253 Noes - 153 |
|
22 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lord Wei voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 156 Conservative Aye votes vs 1 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 246 Noes - 169 |
|
22 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lord Wei voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 145 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 163 Noes - 236 |
|
28 Oct 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Wei voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 158 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 240 Noes - 143 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Lord Wei speeches from: Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill
Lord Wei contributed 5 speeches (3,249 words) Thursday 18th September 2025 - Lords Chamber Department for Work and Pensions |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Home Education
Asked by: Lord Wei (Conservative - Life peer) Tuesday 4th November 2025 Question to the Department for Education: To ask His Majesty's Government whether the Department for Education has issued any guidance, formal or informal, to further education colleges or local authorities encouraging them to restrict direct applications from electively home educated students aged 14–16 to avoid any administrative burdens which might be placed on them by the Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill; and if not, what steps they are taking to ensure that public statements by such institutions do not misrepresent government policy. Answered by Baroness Smith of Malvern - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions) The department has not issued any guidance, formal or informal, to further education colleges or local authorities encouraging them to restrict direct applications from electively home educated children. Home educating parents can supplement their child’s education through attendance at part-time further education courses, as part of securing an efficient, full-time and suitable education for their child. The department supports parents’ right to exercise this choice, and this position will not change with the implementation of the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill. Decisions regarding the availability of such courses are at the discretion of each college, who may make decisions based on factors such as available capacity and resources, and may liaise with their local authority as part of this. Funding for part-time courses below level 3 is available to colleges so long as the 14-16 funding arrangements detailed in the funding rates and formula guidance are followed. To support implementation of Bill measures, the department will issue statutory guidance to aid local authorities and parents. |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
18 Sep 2025, 6 p.m. - House of Lords "Alongside that amendment, we have amendment 502YN tabled by Lord Wei " Baroness Smith of Malvern, Minister of State (Education) (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
18 Sep 2025, 6:01 p.m. - House of Lords "tabled by Lord Wei, it is not this government's intention to impose unnecessary disproportionate burden " Baroness Smith of Malvern, Minister of State (Education) (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
18 Sep 2025, 7:05 p.m. - House of Lords "502 why be Lord Wei not moved. Amendment 502YQ not moved. Amendment " Lord Young of Acton (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
18 Sep 2025, 7:05 p.m. - House of Lords "to YN Lord Wei not moved. Amendment " Lord Young of Acton (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
20 Oct 2025, 10:13 p.m. - House of Lords "guidance is advisory, and who is going to enforce it? My Noble friend Lord Wei Catherine. >> And I have. >> Spent enough time dealing with " Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill
159 speeches (44,465 words) Thursday 18th September 2025 - Lords Chamber Department for Work and Pensions Mentions: 1: None Finally, Amendment 502YP, tabled in the name of the noble Lord, Lord Wei, would require the Secretary - Link to Speech 2: None Amendment 502YQ, tabled by the noble Lord, Lord Wei, seeks to restrict the personal data collected by - Link to Speech 3: Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer) Those in the name of my noble friend Lord Wei also seek to limit the new powers in the Bill in relation - Link to Speech 4: Baroness Smith of Malvern (Lab - Life peer) Act, disapplication and commencement.I will begin with Amendment 502YR tabled by the noble Lord, Lord Wei - Link to Speech |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Wednesday 17th September 2025
Agendas and papers - Special Inquiry Committee proposals 2026 Liaison Committee (Lords) Found: Clement-Jones, Baroness Kidron, Lord Knight of Weymouth, the Lord Bishop of Oxford, Lord Tarassenko and Lord Wei |