Royal Navy: Harpoon Anti-ship Missiles Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Ministry of Defence

Royal Navy: Harpoon Anti-ship Missiles

Lord Watts Excerpts
Wednesday 23rd November 2016

(7 years, 7 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Earl Howe Portrait Earl Howe
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am grateful to my noble friend. It is important to understand the larger picture, as I alluded to a minute ago. For the first time in many decades, the Royal Navy is growing in both size and capability. Its judgment was that investing in the carriers, the Type 26 Global Combat Ship, the new submarines and the offshore patrol vessels, as well a range of missiles and capabilities, rather than reinvesting in a 1980s weapons system, represented the right order of priority for the Royal Navy’s overall capability. That firmly remains its judgment.

Lord Watts Portrait Lord Watts (Lab)
- Hansard - -

My Lords, will the Minister set out which of the items in the long list of problems we have just heard are not correct and which are?

Earl Howe Portrait Earl Howe
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The noble Lord, Lord West, painted a picture of a dysfunctional Royal Navy. I repudiate that picture entirely. It is a Royal Navy that can be proud of the investment that is being placed in it. One of the proudest features are the carriers that the noble Lord, Lord West, was instrumental in commissioning.