Small and Medium-sized Enterprises: AI Sector

Lord Walney Excerpts

Thursday 29th October 2026 Lords Chamber

[Lord Leong (Lab)]

I hear what the noble Lord, says but I say again that our £100 million R&D procurement scheme will help British start-ups develop innovative solutions to government challenges. We are making government a smarter, more accessible customer and creating procurement opportunities for smaller firms instead of favouring established suppliers. Through the sovereign AI fund, we are also supporting early start-up procurement, enabling innovative businesses to demonstrate that technologies generate revenue and attract private investment.

I encourage noble Lords to visit local university science and technology hubs and see innovative AI companies. I was up in Manchester yesterday and there I saw young people and exciting projects. Perhaps noble Lords could go out to university science parks and be encouraged by what is being developed in this country.

[Lord Walney (CB)]

My Lords, does the Minister agree that the Government’s support for, and adoption of, an open source AI framework could greatly reduce the barriers to entry for smaller firms and accelerate investment, particularly if this could be done in partnership with allied nations across the world?

[Lord Leong (Lab)]

I agree with the noble Lord. That is why the British Business Bank has £25.6 billion in financial capacity to support smarter and smaller businesses, including £4 billion in growth capital specifically for innovative research-intensive companies. The sovereign AI fund works alongside the bank, including co-investing in a company called Ineffable Intelligence, a London-based artificial intelligence research lab. Meanwhile, the National Wealth Fund, with £27.8 billion to deploy, is mobilising private investment in AI infrastructure, including a guaranteed £202 million to support various AI companies.

Sovereign AI Fund

Lord Walney Excerpts

Monday 1st June 2026 Lords Chamber

[Baroness Lloyd of Effra (Lab)]

The noble Baroness is correct to highlight that we have been clear that copyright rules should be respected and the use of copyright works to train AI in the UK requires a licence unless an exception applies. Companies supported by the sovereign AI fund are expected to comply with applicable UK law, including copyright. When we are talking about compliance in relation to grant-funded compute allocations, they equally must comply with copyright law while undertaking that funded activity.

[Lord Walney (CB)]

Is the Minister open-minded about the huge potential that the UK embracing an open-source AI model alongside allies may accrue to the country to put us back in the premier league rather than needing to be reliant on America and overseas?

[Baroness Lloyd of Effra (Lab)]

It is not an area on which I feel I can definitively give an opinion on the view of the Government. I know from the cyber security point of view that there are many merits and disbenefits of open-weight models in terms of their cyber security credentials, and that is something that we are working on very carefully.

CPTPP: Conclusion of Negotiations

Lord Walney Excerpts

Wednesday 19th April 2023 Lords Chamber

[Lord Johnson of Lainston (Con)]

I thank my noble kinsman for his intervention; this is the first time we have spoken in this way. I asked the House of Lords Library whether there were any other pairings of son-in-law and father-in-law, and I have not received a response; maybe the Library was too alarmed by our own prospects. But my noble kinsman raises a good point about the statistical analysis of the value of this trade deal to the UK. I wish to avoid getting drawn into complex statistical discussions in this important but short opening debate, but I am happy to do so in the future, and there will be further impact assessments.

It is difficult to forecast the ramifications of a trade arrangement. In fact, what has been produced is not a forecast; it is a static model. It is not for me to lecture Peers in this House on how that functions but as the name implies, it is a static model rather than a positive forecast of how trade can be increased on account of this deal. All I will say is that New Zealand signed a free trade deal with China, and its model projected $3 billion a year of additional trade activity; I think within five years, it was over $30 billion a year. So it is not simply a question of looking at one static model; we must look at a more effective impact assessment in the future and make our own forecasts. As I say, it is not simply about trade data; it is also about the influence we will have in this region and the philosophical endeavour we embark on to encourage free trade around the world.

[Lord Walney (CB)]

The Minister has been clear that he is not going to express a view on particular countries joining, but will he at least be clear that the Government will view Taiwan’s application as a valid one not subject to any veto from China?