Lord Vallance of Balham

Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Lord Vallance of Balham

Information between 19th January 2026 - 18th February 2026

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.

Division Votes
19 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Vallance of Balham voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 154 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 216 Noes - 161
19 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Vallance of Balham voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 149 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 159 Noes - 153
19 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Vallance of Balham voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 155 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 232 Noes - 160
19 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Vallance of Balham voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 156 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 235 Noes - 164
19 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Vallance of Balham voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 151 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 148 Noes - 156
21 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Vallance of Balham voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 114 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 53 Noes - 116
21 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Vallance of Balham voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 139 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 65 Noes - 162
21 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Vallance of Balham voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 134 Labour No votes vs 3 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 261 Noes - 150
21 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Vallance of Balham voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 140 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 207 Noes - 159
3 Feb 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Vallance of Balham voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 166 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 295 Noes - 180
4 Feb 2026 - Public Order Act 2023 (Interference With Use or Operation of Key National Infrastructure) Regulations 2025 - View Vote Context Lord Vallance of Balham voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 165 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 62 Noes - 295
10 Feb 2026 - Sustainable Aviation Fuel Bill - View Vote Context Lord Vallance of Balham voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 173 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 186 Noes - 251

Speeches
Lord Vallance of Balham speeches from: High Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactors Lord Vallance of Balham contributed 11 speeches (787 words) Monday 19th January 2026 - Lords Chamber Department for Energy Security & Net Zero

Lord Vallance of Balham mentioned

Parliamentary Debates
Public Order Act 2023 (Interference With Use or Operation of Key National Infrastructure) Regulations 2025 35 speeches (11,344 words) Wednesday 4th February 2026 - Lords Chamber Home Office Mentions: 1: Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green - Life peer) Our Minister, the noble Lord, Lord Vallance of Balham, said last November:“Now, new advances in technology—particularly - Link to Speech

Parliamentary Debates

Public Order Act 2023 (Interference With Use or Operation of Key National Infrastructure) Regulations 2025
35 speeches (11,344 words)
Wednesday 4th February 2026 - Lords Chamber
Home Office

Mentions:
1: Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green - Life peer) Our Minister, the noble Lord, Lord Vallance of Balham, said last November:“Now, new advances in technology—particularly - Link to Speech

Select Committee Documents
Wednesday 4th February 2026 Correspondence - Correspondence from Minister of State for Science, Innovation, Research and Nuclear, re: UK-US life sciences deal, 30 January 2026 Science, Innovation and Technology Committee Found: Yours sincerely, Lord Vallance of Balham KCB Minister for Science, Innovation, Research and

Written Answers
MBR Acres Asked by: Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb (Green Party - Life peer) Monday 9th February 2026 Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology: To ask His Majesty's Government whether they will publish the letter sent by Lord Vallance of Balham to the Home Secretary following his meeting with the CEO of MBR Acres on 17 September 2025. Answered by Lord Vallance of Balham - Minister of State (Department for Energy Security and Net Zero) The Department for Science, Innovation and Technology will not be publishing this letter. Releasing internal correspondence at this stage would prematurely expose discussions that relate to the ongoing development of the government’s position on a sensitive policy area. The issues involve complex regulatory, scientific, and public safety considerations, and ministerial discussions include exploratory thinking, provisional advice, and options that have not yet been finalised.

Written Answers

MBR Acres
Asked by: Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb (Green Party - Life peer)
Monday 9th February 2026

Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology:

To ask His Majesty's Government whether they will publish the letter sent by Lord Vallance of Balham to the Home Secretary following his meeting with the CEO of MBR Acres on 17 September 2025.

Answered by Lord Vallance of Balham - Minister of State (Department for Energy Security and Net Zero)

The Department for Science, Innovation and Technology will not be publishing this letter. Releasing internal correspondence at this stage would prematurely expose discussions that relate to the ongoing development of the government’s position on a sensitive policy area. The issues involve complex regulatory, scientific, and public safety considerations, and ministerial discussions include exploratory thinking, provisional advice, and options that have not yet been finalised.