Debates between Lord Trefgarne and Lord Lucas during the 2010-2015 Parliament

Equality (Titles) Bill [HL]

Debate between Lord Trefgarne and Lord Lucas
Friday 6th December 2013

(10 years, 11 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Lucas Portrait Lord Lucas
- Hansard - - - Excerpts



That the House do now resolve itself into Committee.

Lord Trefgarne Portrait Lord Trefgarne (Con)
- Hansard - -

My Lords, with your Lordships’ permission I would like to say a word about the Motion that my noble friend has just moved. I had understood from my conversations with my noble friend that he had intended to table amendments to make significant changes to the Bill. I am not sure whether they appear on the Order Paper at this stage. If it is the case that I have not understood them fully—and no doubt my noble friend will explain them in due course—I am happy that we should proceed as he proposes.

Lord Lucas Portrait Lord Lucas (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, it may be that my amendments do not come up to the noble Lord’s standards but I hope that he will find that those I have introduced have the effect of giving certainty to the Bill, in that it will happen to everybody in time and allow those Peers who wish to accelerate the process to do so, rather than it being left as an uncertain process for ever.

--- Later in debate ---
Lord Trefgarne Portrait Lord Trefgarne
- Hansard - -

I am far from an expert in these matters but, as I understand them, these things can be determined by analysis these days. It is therefore perfectly straightforward to satisfy or solve a dispute as to who was the mother or father. The amendment tabled by my noble friend Lord Jopling goes the right way and I support it.

Lord Lucas Portrait Lord Lucas
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, I, too, support my noble friend’s amendment. It would have been very useful to the Lord Bengwill of his day—in 1745 he was on the wrong side, or perhaps the right side, and his title was extinguished for a while before being reignited in Victorian times—if he had been able to save a few frozen Stuart embryos, which the society for the restoration of the Stuarts could pop out into this world at regular intervals as proven children of that line. It might cause some confusion. Perhaps things are not quite as simple, particularly for succession to privileges and powers, as they are in ordinary human reproduction, so we ought to take a little care.