Debates between Lord Trefgarne and Baroness Jolly during the 2010-2015 Parliament

NHS: GP Salaries

Debate between Lord Trefgarne and Baroness Jolly
Monday 26th January 2015

(9 years, 10 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lord Trefgarne Portrait Lord Trefgarne
- Hansard - -



To ask Her Majesty’s Government what is the average salary paid to general practitioners working within the National Health Service.

Baroness Jolly Portrait Baroness Jolly (LD)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, in England, in 2012-13, the average income for a contractor GP was £105,100 and for a salaried GP £56,600—both before tax. A contractor GP is a practitioner who entered into a contract with the NHS as a single-hander or as part of a partnership. Eighty per cent of GPs are contractors.

Lord Trefgarne Portrait Lord Trefgarne (Con)
- Hansard - -

I am grateful to my noble friend for that reply. In view of these quite respectable salaries, might it not be reasonable to expect a little bit of work in the evenings and on Saturdays?

General Practitioners: Hippocratic Oath

Debate between Lord Trefgarne and Baroness Jolly
Thursday 11th December 2014

(9 years, 11 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lord Trefgarne Portrait Lord Trefgarne
- Hansard - -



To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether general practitioners working within the National Health Service are bound by the Hippocratic Oath, and if so, whether they will place a copy of the said oath in the Library of the House.

Baroness Jolly Portrait Baroness Jolly (LD)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, there is no requirement for doctors to take an oath in the UK. Some medical schools may choose to include an oath in their graduation ceremonies, but that is not a requirement. When a doctor requests registration with the General Medical Council, before they can submit payment, and therefore as the final mandatory step, they must sign a declaration, part of which reads:

“I have read Good Medical Practice and understand my actions may be judged against the standards and principles it contains”.

Lord Trefgarne Portrait Lord Trefgarne (Con)
- Hansard - -

My Lords, I am most grateful to my noble friend for that reply. Is it not the case that the GP contract, with or without the Hippocratic oath, is now not fit for purpose, despite its 208-page length? Does my noble friend not therefore agree that it is time the contract was considered from top to bottom, particularly as regards the provision of out-of-hours and evening services?

Baroness Jolly Portrait Baroness Jolly
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, the 2004 contract has been reviewed and renewed on an annual basis, and has proven to be a fairly robust document. The Government are not at the moment minded to change its basis. As for out-of-hours services—the nub of the Question—GPs can decide whether they opt out. Where they do opt out, the providers are inspected by the CQC and the local CCG.