Lord Touhig Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Lord Touhig

Information between 21st March 2026 - 30th May 2026

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Calendar
Thursday 25th June 2026
Lord Touhig (Labour - Life peer)

Oral questions - Main Chamber
Subject: Reducing the level of unemployment of people with autism
View calendar - Add to calendar


Division Votes
24 Mar 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Touhig voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 126 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 70 Noes - 132
24 Mar 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Touhig voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 146 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 285 Noes - 156
24 Mar 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Touhig voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 146 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 250 Noes - 158
24 Mar 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Touhig voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 147 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 187 Noes - 157
24 Mar 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Touhig voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 147 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 80 Noes - 166
25 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Touhig voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 143 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 163 Noes - 195
25 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Touhig voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 136 Labour No votes vs 6 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 266 Noes - 141
25 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Touhig voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 133 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 95 Noes - 137
25 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Touhig voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 143 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 205 Noes - 147
25 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Touhig voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 143 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 207 Noes - 148
15 Apr 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Touhig voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 169 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 270 Noes - 200
15 Apr 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Touhig voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 165 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 209 Noes - 260
27 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Touhig voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 136 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 199 Noes - 144
27 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Touhig voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 139 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 210 Noes - 145
27 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Touhig voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 133 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 58 Noes - 138
27 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Touhig voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 139 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 217 Noes - 145
27 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Touhig voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 153 Labour No votes vs 5 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 316 Noes - 165
28 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Touhig voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 160 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 91 Noes - 181


Speeches
Lord Touhig speeches from: King’s Speech
Lord Touhig contributed 1 speech (578 words)
Tuesday 19th May 2026 - Lords Chamber
Department for Energy Security & Net Zero


Written Answers
Special Educational Needs: Private Education
Asked by: Lord Touhig (Labour - Life peer)
Friday 29th May 2026

Question to the Department for Education:

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of local authority attempts to introduce banding frameworks for children and young people with special educational needs and disabilities.

Answered by Baroness Smith of Malvern - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions)

Many local authorities have systems which indicate the range of top-up funding that might be provided for children and young people with a particular type and complexity of need, sometimes referred to as ‘banding frameworks’. These can help determine levels of high needs top-up funding for children and young people with special educational needs and disabilities. A system which agrees likely levels of top-up funding in advance can also be an efficient, clear and transparent way of allocating funding.

The department has published guidance on how local authorities should allocate this funding. Section 7.4 of the high needs funding operational guidance sets out that top-up funding can reflect the costs of provision for a cohort of pupils at or within a school or college. The operational guidance is available on GOV.UK.

Funding does not need to be tied to the detailed provision that may be required or which is specified in education, health and care (EHC) plans, since schools and colleges have flexibility in deploying resources.

The local authority must be satisfied, however, that the final allocation of funding (both the top-up funding and other elements of funding) is sufficient to secure suitable provision for example, as outlined in an EHC plan.

Special Educational Needs
Asked by: Lord Touhig (Labour - Life peer)
Friday 29th May 2026

Question to the Department for Education:

To ask His Majesty's Government what plans they have to ensure families are involved in the assessment of their children's needs and in the development of the children's individual support plans.

Answered by Baroness Smith of Malvern - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions)

The department recognises that families play a vital role in identifying and understanding their children’s needs, and we expect education settings to work in partnership with parents and carers as part of early identification, ongoing assessment and the timely provision of support.

We will place a duty on settings to produce an Individual Support Plan (ISP) for any child or young person with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND). The ISP will be developed by settings together with parents and young people, giving every child or young person with SEND a clear and consistent record of their needs and the help they receive, so that support is joined‑up, timely and genuinely centred on what will help them to thrive. ISPs will be used to communicate provision to parents and actions taken between parents and settings, supporting the relationship between home and setting. ISPs must be reviewed at least annually and may be reviewed more frequently as a child’s needs develop.

Special Educational Needs: Staff
Asked by: Lord Touhig (Labour - Life peer)
Friday 29th May 2026

Question to the Department for Education:

To ask His Majesty's Government whether they have assessed the (1) number, and (2) availability, of trained professionals needed to meet the plan for Experts at Hand included in the schools white paper Every child achieving and thriving, published on 23 February.

Answered by Baroness Smith of Malvern - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions)

The government is providing substantial, targeted investment to help local areas grow and strengthen their specialist workforce. Over the next three years, £1.8 billion will be made available to local area partnerships to develop and rollout of the Experts at Hand offer.

Local area partnerships will design and implement their own Experts at Hand models, tailored to local needs and workforce capacity, supported by strong national oversight. The department will set the overall framework, provide guidance and tools, and work closely with local areas to ensure consistent quality. We have also announced £15 million for new speech and language therapy advanced practitioner roles, as well as continuing our investment in the educational psychology workforce with £26 million to train at least 200 educational psychologists per year from 2026 and 2027, building on previous investment.

The department knows that continuing to build the specialist workforce is essential. It is working with the Department of Health and Social Care and NHS England, as part of wider long-term workforce priorities such as the 10 Year Workforce Plan, to improve access to community health services, including speech and language therapy, for children and young people with special educational needs and disabilities.

Special Educational Needs
Asked by: Lord Touhig (Labour - Life peer)
Friday 29th May 2026

Question to the Department for Education:

To ask His Majesty's Government what plans they have to ensure that there are legal mechanisms for parents to hold education providers accountable for implementing individual support plans effectively and appropriately.

Answered by Baroness Smith of Malvern - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions)

Individual Support Plans (ISPs) will provide a record of need and provision for any child or young person receiving targeted, targeted plus or specialist support in school or college. They will allow settings to work alongside parents, providing a single, consistent record of what support has been tried, what has worked and what needs to change.

Under the proposals, settings will have a legal duty to produce an ISP for every child with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND), including those who also have an education health and care plan. Where there are concerns about provision within an ISP, parents and young people would be able to raise these directly with the setting. The department’s proposals include strengthening the complaints process through having an independent SEND expert on panels to hear complaints concerning provision for a child with SEND.




Lord Touhig mentioned

Live Transcript

Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm.

19 May 2026, 7:23 p.m. - House of Lords
"Act. But my noble friend Lord Touhig, of course, earlier in this "
Baroness Browning (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript
19 May 2026, 9:49 p.m. - House of Lords
"Isaac the noble Lord Touhig, and "
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat) - View Video - View Transcript


Parliamentary Debates
King’s Speech
149 speeches (53,868 words)
Tuesday 19th May 2026 - Lords Chamber
Department for Energy Security & Net Zero
Mentions:
1: Baroness Browning (Con - Life peer) My noble friend Lord Touhig flagged up many issues of concern in the legislation as far as autism is - Link to Speech
2: Lord Clement-Jones (LD - Life peer) I look forward to many future speeches from them.The noble Lords, Lord Hobby, Lord Isaac and Lord Touhig - Link to Speech