Lord Timpson - Alert Sample

Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Lord Timpson

Information between 15th April 2026 - 25th April 2026

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.

Division Votes
15 Apr 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Lord Timpson voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 169 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 270 Noes - 200
15 Apr 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Lord Timpson voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 165 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 209 Noes - 260
16 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Timpson voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 131 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 135 Noes - 154
16 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Timpson voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 132 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 142 Noes - 192
16 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Timpson voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 130 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 225 Noes - 144
16 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Timpson voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 130 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 186 Noes - 144
16 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Timpson voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 127 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 216 Noes - 141
16 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Timpson voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 117 Labour No votes vs 2 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 115 Noes - 121
16 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Timpson voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 133 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 192 Noes - 142
20 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Timpson voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 138 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 219 Noes - 144
20 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Timpson voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 147 Labour No votes vs 4 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 284 Noes - 158
20 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Timpson voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 153 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 259 Noes - 180
20 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Timpson voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 139 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 162 Noes - 151
20 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Timpson voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 142 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 211 Noes - 150
20 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Timpson voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 141 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 216 Noes - 148
20 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Timpson voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 156 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 276 Noes - 169
23 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Timpson voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 128 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 152 Noes - 207
23 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Timpson voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 125 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 220 Noes - 143
23 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Timpson voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 126 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 208 Noes - 138
23 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Timpson voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 128 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 207 Noes - 141
23 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Timpson voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 130 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 209 Noes - 145
23 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Timpson voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 128 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 199 Noes - 146
23 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Timpson voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 128 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 197 Noes - 144

Lord Timpson mentioned

Select Committee Documents
Tuesday 21st April 2026 Correspondence - Correspondence from Lord Timpson, Minister for Prisons, Probation and Reducing Reoffending, dated 17 April 2026: HMPPS Fire Safety Improvement programme Justice Committee Found: Correspondence from Lord Timpson, Minister for Prisons, Probation and Reducing Reoffending, dated 17
Tuesday 21st April 2026 Correspondence - Correspondence from Lord Timpson, Minister for Prisons, Probation and Reducing Reoffending, dated 15 April 2026: Urgent Notification - HMP Woodhill Justice Committee Found: Correspondence from Lord Timpson, Minister for Prisons, Probation and Reducing Reoffending, dated 15
Tuesday 21st April 2026 Correspondence - Letter dated 26 March 2026 from Lord Timpson to the Chair regarding the government’s response to the prison service pay review body’s recommendations for 2026/27 Justice and Home Affairs Committee Found: Letter dated 26 March 2026 from Lord Timpson to the Chair regarding the government’s response to the
Tuesday 21st April 2026 Correspondence - Letter dated 26 March 2026 from Lord Timpson to the Chair regarding an update on the prison, probation, youth justice and court custody scrutiny bodies landscape Justice and Home Affairs Committee Found: Letter dated 26 March 2026 from Lord Timpson to the Chair regarding an update on the prison, probation
Monday 20th April 2026 Correspondence - Letter from Minister of State for Prisons, Probation and Reducing Reoffending to the Chair of the Public Accounts Committee relating to the Fire Safety Improvement programme, 20 March 2026 Public Accounts Committee Found: Lord Timpson Minister of State for Justice MoJ ref: SUB132831 Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown Chair
Friday 17th April 2026 Written Evidence - Privacy International RAI0081 - Human Rights and the Regulation of AI Human Rights and the Regulation of AI - Human Rights (Joint Committee) Found: Institute, https://www.aisi.gov.uk/ 60 Ministry of Justice, The Rt Hon Shabana Mahmood MP and Lord Timpson

Written Answers
Prisoner Escorts Asked by: Mary Glindon (Labour - Newcastle upon Tyne East and Wallsend) Wednesday 15th April 2026 Question to the Ministry of Justice: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what recent discussions his Department has had with Prisoner Escort and Custody Services contractors who have escorted prisoners to court late and were attributable to trials being delayed. Answered by Jake Richards - Assistant Whip HMPPS holds regular contract management boards and strategic partnership boards with Prisoner Escort and Custody Services (PECS) suppliers to review performance, including any instances where late arrival at court has been attributed to supplier actions. These discussions are informed by assured Court Exception Report data from courts and focus on identifying root causes, agreeing corrective actions and applying contractual levers where appropriate. To strengthen system wide oversight, a Prisoner Delivery Oversight Board has been established, chaired by Lord Timpson and Minister Sackman, with representation from key Criminal Justice System partners, and will meet quarterly. Evidence from recent performance reporting shows consistent levels of PECS Supplier delivery to court, with supplier attributable delays remaining low relative to overall court production volumes. In 2025, overall criminal justice system delivery to court was on time in 98.19% of cases; PECS suppliers met contractual expectations by delivering prisoners to court on time in 99.91% of cases. PECS supplier attributable delays represent a small proportion of overall court delays, which are approximately 8% as a whole. The Department continually assesses the effectiveness of service credits within PECS contracts as part of its performance management framework. Service credits are applied where outcomes fall below contractual standards and act as an incentive to maintain high levels of punctuality and operational performance. Where performance concerns arise, service credits are accompanied by improvement plans and closer operational scrutiny to drive sustained improvement rather than relying on financial levers alone.
Prisoner Escorts: Contracts Asked by: Mary Glindon (Labour - Newcastle upon Tyne East and Wallsend) Wednesday 15th April 2026 Question to the Ministry of Justice: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what assessment he has made of the potential impact of service credits in contractual arrangements with Prisoner Escort and Custody Services suppliers on the punctuality of prisoner arrivals in court. Answered by Jake Richards - Assistant Whip HMPPS holds regular contract management boards and strategic partnership boards with Prisoner Escort and Custody Services (PECS) suppliers to review performance, including any instances where late arrival at court has been attributed to supplier actions. These discussions are informed by assured Court Exception Report data from courts and focus on identifying root causes, agreeing corrective actions and applying contractual levers where appropriate. To strengthen system wide oversight, a Prisoner Delivery Oversight Board has been established, chaired by Lord Timpson and Minister Sackman, with representation from key Criminal Justice System partners, and will meet quarterly. Evidence from recent performance reporting shows consistent levels of PECS Supplier delivery to court, with supplier attributable delays remaining low relative to overall court production volumes. In 2025, overall criminal justice system delivery to court was on time in 98.19% of cases; PECS suppliers met contractual expectations by delivering prisoners to court on time in 99.91% of cases. PECS supplier attributable delays represent a small proportion of overall court delays, which are approximately 8% as a whole. The Department continually assesses the effectiveness of service credits within PECS contracts as part of its performance management framework. Service credits are applied where outcomes fall below contractual standards and act as an incentive to maintain high levels of punctuality and operational performance. Where performance concerns arise, service credits are accompanied by improvement plans and closer operational scrutiny to drive sustained improvement rather than relying on financial levers alone.

Written Answers

Prisoner Escorts
Asked by: Mary Glindon (Labour - Newcastle upon Tyne East and Wallsend)
Wednesday 15th April 2026

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what recent discussions his Department has had with Prisoner Escort and Custody Services contractors who have escorted prisoners to court late and were attributable to trials being delayed.

Answered by Jake Richards - Assistant Whip

HMPPS holds regular contract management boards and strategic partnership boards with Prisoner Escort and Custody Services (PECS) suppliers to review performance, including any instances where late arrival at court has been attributed to supplier actions. These discussions are informed by assured Court Exception Report data from courts and focus on identifying root causes, agreeing corrective actions and applying contractual levers where appropriate. To strengthen system wide oversight, a Prisoner Delivery Oversight Board has been established, chaired by Lord Timpson and Minister Sackman, with representation from key Criminal Justice System partners, and will meet quarterly.

Evidence from recent performance reporting shows consistent levels of PECS Supplier delivery to court, with supplier attributable delays remaining low relative to overall court production volumes. In 2025, overall criminal justice system delivery to court was on time in 98.19% of cases; PECS suppliers met contractual expectations by delivering prisoners to court on time in 99.91% of cases. PECS supplier attributable delays represent a small proportion of overall court delays, which are approximately 8% as a whole.

The Department continually assesses the effectiveness of service credits within PECS contracts as part of its performance management framework. Service credits are applied where outcomes fall below contractual standards and act as an incentive to maintain high levels of punctuality and operational performance. Where performance concerns arise, service credits are accompanied by improvement plans and closer operational scrutiny to drive sustained improvement rather than relying on financial levers alone.

Prisoner Escorts: Contracts
Asked by: Mary Glindon (Labour - Newcastle upon Tyne East and Wallsend)
Wednesday 15th April 2026

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what assessment he has made of the potential impact of service credits in contractual arrangements with Prisoner Escort and Custody Services suppliers on the punctuality of prisoner arrivals in court.

Answered by Jake Richards - Assistant Whip