Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd

Information between 24th March 2026 - 23rd April 2026

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
24 Mar 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd voted Aye and in line with the House
One of 31 Crossbench Aye votes vs 7 Crossbench No votes
Tally: Ayes - 285 Noes - 156
24 Mar 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd voted No and in line with the House
One of 16 Crossbench No votes vs 14 Crossbench Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 80 Noes - 166
25 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd voted Aye and in line with the House
One of 53 Crossbench Aye votes vs 4 Crossbench No votes
Tally: Ayes - 306 Noes - 145
26 Mar 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd voted Aye and in line with the House
One of 8 Crossbench Aye votes vs 4 Crossbench No votes
Tally: Ayes - 152 Noes - 128
13 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd voted No and in line with the House
One of 15 Crossbench No votes vs 12 Crossbench Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 178 Noes - 231
13 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd voted No and in line with the House
One of 16 Crossbench No votes vs 9 Crossbench Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 69 Noes - 332
13 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd voted Aye and in line with the House
One of 21 Crossbench Aye votes vs 17 Crossbench No votes
Tally: Ayes - 257 Noes - 180
13 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd voted Aye and in line with the House
One of 15 Crossbench Aye votes vs 27 Crossbench No votes
Tally: Ayes - 247 Noes - 187
15 Apr 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd voted No and against the House
One of 28 Crossbench No votes vs 6 Crossbench Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 270 Noes - 200
15 Apr 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd voted No and in line with the House
One of 32 Crossbench No votes vs 12 Crossbench Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 209 Noes - 260
20 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd voted Aye and in line with the House
One of 31 Crossbench Aye votes vs 9 Crossbench No votes
Tally: Ayes - 276 Noes - 169
20 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd voted Aye and in line with the House
One of 39 Crossbench Aye votes vs 5 Crossbench No votes
Tally: Ayes - 284 Noes - 158
20 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd voted No and against the House
One of 7 Crossbench No votes vs 7 Crossbench Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 162 Noes - 151
20 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd voted Aye and in line with the House
One of 12 Crossbench Aye votes vs 2 Crossbench No votes
Tally: Ayes - 211 Noes - 150
20 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd voted Aye and in line with the House
One of 12 Crossbench Aye votes vs 3 Crossbench No votes
Tally: Ayes - 216 Noes - 148
20 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd voted Aye and in line with the House
One of 16 Crossbench Aye votes vs 2 Crossbench No votes
Tally: Ayes - 219 Noes - 144


Speeches
Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd speeches from: Victims and Courts Bill
Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd contributed 1 speech (68 words)
Consideration of Commons amendments and / or reasons
Wednesday 15th April 2026 - Lords Chamber
Ministry of Justice
Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd speeches from: Crime and Policing Bill
Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd contributed 1 speech (70 words)
3rd reading
Wednesday 25th March 2026 - Lords Chamber
Home Office


Written Answers
Crown Court
Asked by: Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd (Crossbench - Life peer)
Monday 13th April 2026

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask His Majesty's Government how many hours per day the Crown Courts at (1) Liverpool, (2) Crown Square, and (3) Minshull Street, sat on average between (a) September and December 2024, and (b) September and December 2025; what was the average time taken at these courts from receipt of a case to its conclusion in (1) December 2024, and (2) December 2025; and what assessment they have made of the earliest date at which a trial of (1) 2 days, (2) 10 days, and (3) 6 weeks, would be heard at these courts as of March 2026.

Answered by Baroness Levitt - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Justice)

Criminal Court data is published at a Local Criminal Justice Board (LCJB) area level and not by individual court. This reduces volatility and fluctuations associated with low volumes of cases at some court centres. The Criminal Courts Accredited Official Statistics are published quarterly and data is reported by quarter. The information requested is provided at LCJB area level. Listing is a judicial responsibility and function. The purpose is to ensure that all cases are brought to a hearing or trial in accordance with the interests of justice, that the resources available for criminal justice are deployed as effectively as possible, and that cases are heard by an appropriate judge or bench with the minimum of delay. (CRIMINAL PRACTICE DIRECTIONS 2015 DIVISION XIII ). Data on how far a court is listing certain lengths of trial concerning the listing of trials of particular duration is held locally by individual court centres and not centrally held. It is influenced by the listing policy of the Resident Judge in question and the local open caseload. It is subject to continual change and adapts to reflect the open caseload volume and case mix at any point in time. Normally cases are listed in order of priority according to a number of factors (e.g. counsel availability and courtroom availability) as well as the time estimate. Earlier listing dates may become available where other trials are vacated, or if the Resident Judge decides to prioritise one trial over another (for example those involving young defendants or child witnesses). Both LCJB areas are listing custody cases within the required Custody Time Limits. The listing data provided below relates to general bail cases and reflects the position as at 27 March 2026.

Data Source

Time period

Merseyside LCJB Area*

Greater Manchester LCJB Area*

Average (mean) Hours per day sat

HMCTS Internal Management Information

Sept-Dec 2024

3.8

4.0

Average (mean) Hours per day sat

HMCTS Internal Management Information

Sept-Dec 2025

3.8

4.0

Average (median) time taken receipt at the Crown Court to conclusion (days)

Criminal court statistics - GOV.UK.

Oct – Dec 2024

76

169

Average (median) time taken receipt at the Crown Court to conclusion (days)

Criminal court statistics - GOV.UK.

Oct-Dec 2025

103

168

Earliest date for listing a 2-day bail trial

HMCTS Local Court Information

As at 27/03/26

22/02/2027

01/07/2027

Earliest date for listing a 10-day bail trial

HMCTS Local Court Information

As at 27/03/26

03/05/2027

31/07/2028

Earliest date for listing a 6-week bail trial

HMCTS Local Court Information

As at 27/03/26

07/06/2027

11/09/2028

*The respective LCJBs cover courts including (a) Liverpool Crown and (b) the two Manchester Crown centres.



Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd mentioned

Select Committee Documents
Friday 17th April 2026
Written Evidence - Bates Wells LLP
RAI0035 - Human Rights and the Regulation of AI

Human Rights and the Regulation of AI - Human Rights (Joint Committee)

Found: Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd addressed the problems of overly complex legal frameworks in the debate on the

Friday 17th April 2026
Written Evidence - Bates Wells LLP
RAI0035 - Human Rights and the Regulation of AI

Human Rights and the Regulation of AI - Human Rights (Joint Committee)

Found: Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd addressed the problems of overly complex legal frameworks in the debate on the




Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd mentioned in Welsh results


Welsh Government Publications
Friday 27th March 2026

Source Page: Incorporation of UN Treaties into Welsh Law: report by Legislative Options Working Group
Document: Incorporation of UN Treaties into Welsh Law: report by Legislative Options Working Group (PDF)

Found: In Wales, the number of 84 Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd, ‘Thinking Policy through before Legislating: