Strikes: Cover by Agency Workers Debate
Full Debate: Read Full DebateLord Snape
Main Page: Lord Snape (Labour - Life peer)Department Debates - View all Lord Snape's debates with the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
(2 years, 4 months ago)
Lords ChamberI meant yes in terms of believing in the right to strike; let me clarify that for the benefit of the House. Nothing in these regulations inhibits the right of workers to go on strike. It is worth pointing out that employers can currently employ people directly to take the place of striking workers. All these regulations would do would be to allow for them to bring in agency workers—although, of course, they still have to meet all the appropriate safety provisions my noble friend mentioned earlier.
My Lords, is it any coincidence that these proposals are being made during the course of a dispute in the railway industry? Is the country supposed to believe that there are agencies out there that can recruit signallers, train drivers or booking clerks to take over the jobs of those who are on strike? Is this not yet another example of an overpromoted Secretary of State seeking a newspaper headline?