Information between 25th April 2026 - 3rd August 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
27 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Smith of Finsbury voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 133 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 58 Noes - 138 |
|
27 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Smith of Finsbury voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 139 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 210 Noes - 145 |
|
27 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Smith of Finsbury voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 136 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 199 Noes - 144 |
|
27 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Smith of Finsbury voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 139 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 217 Noes - 145 |
|
27 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Smith of Finsbury voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 153 Labour No votes vs 5 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 316 Noes - 165 |
|
27 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Smith of Finsbury voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 125 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 197 Noes - 129 |
|
28 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Smith of Finsbury voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 160 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 91 Noes - 181 |
|
30 Jun 2026 - National Security (State Threats) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Smith of Finsbury voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 136 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 150 Noes - 216 |
|
22 Jul 2026 - Universal Credit, Personal Independence Payment, Jobseeker’s Allowance and Employment and Support Allowance (Decisions and Appeals) (Amendment) Regulations 2026 - View Vote Context Lord Smith of Finsbury voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 68 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 64 Noes - 95 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Lord Smith of Finsbury speeches from: Greater Cambridge Development Corporation (Establishment) Order 2026
Lord Smith of Finsbury contributed 1 speech (335 words) Wednesday 22nd July 2026 - Lords Chamber Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government |
|
Lord Smith of Finsbury speeches from: Jo Cox Civility Commission
Lord Smith of Finsbury contributed 1 speech (514 words) Thursday 18th June 2026 - Lords Chamber Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government |
|
Lord Smith of Finsbury speeches from: King’s Speech
Lord Smith of Finsbury contributed 1 speech (490 words) Tuesday 19th May 2026 - Lords Chamber Department for Energy Security & Net Zero |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
NHS: Staff
Asked by: Lord Smith of Finsbury (Labour - Life peer) Wednesday 10th June 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask His Majesty's Government what guidance they have given to parts of the NHS regarding allowing individual members of staff to attend LGBT+ Pride marches in uniform. Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) Policies regarding the wearing of uniforms outside of the workplace remain the responsibility of individual organisations in the NHS. National uniform guidance was published by the Department of Health in 2010 and set out specific requirements of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 to support effective hand hygiene. It was updated in 2020 by NHS England to include equality and diversity measures and stipulates that “it is good practice for staff to change at work or cover their uniforms as they travel to and from work”. The guidance identified shopping in uniform or engaging in other activities as examples of poor practice. The Mann review into antisemitism and other forms of racism was published on 4 June 2026 and includes recommendations for the NHS to review and strengthen uniform guidance to ensure that political identifiers do not deter patients from seeking and receiving NHS care. The new NHS England guidance on uniforms, which will be published shortly, will draw on staff and stakeholder input and existing best practice in the NHS, including existing guidance at Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust and University College London Hospitals. |
|
HIV/AIDS
Asked by: Lord Smith of Finsbury (Labour - Life peer) Tuesday 16th June 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to allow patients with HIV, where the virus is undetectable, to have access to medical trials for new cancer drugs and treatments. Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) The Department invests £1.8 billion each year on research through its research delivery arm, the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR). The Department is committed to ensuring that all patients, including those with HIV, have access to cutting-edge clinical trials, and innovative, lifesaving treatments through the NIHR. The NIHR does not set participant eligibility criteria for individual clinical trials. These are determined by study sponsors and investigators, subject to regulatory and ethics approval. In 2024, the Department made equity, diversity, and inclusion a condition of funding for all domestic research awards funded through the NIHR. This means applicants must demonstrate how their research will contribute towards the NIHR’s mission to reduce health and care inequalities, with a focus on participant inclusion from diverse populations of the United Kingdom. From March 2026, all NIHR applicants across all award types are required to design their research inclusively in order to receive NIHR funding. The NIHR funds a broad portfolio of research on HIV including research on a range of health and care issues conducted with people living with HIV but not specifically about HIV. Between April 2020 and March 2025, the NIHR committed over £74 million on new research projects on HIV, including research on addressing barriers to healthcare access for people with HIV. In addition, cancer is a major area of NIHR spending at £141.6 million in 2024/25, reflecting its high priority. The NIHR continues to welcome high quality applications for research into any aspect of human health and care, including HIV and cancer. These applications are subject to peer review and judged in open competition, with awards being made on the basis of the importance of the topic to the public and health and care services, value for money, and scientific quality.
|
|
HIV/AIDS
Asked by: Lord Smith of Finsbury (Labour - Life peer) Monday 13th July 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Merron on 16 June (HL761), what assessment they have made of the reasons why some HIV-positive patients have been told that they are ineligible for participation in cancer clinical trials. Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) The Department invests £1.8 billion each year on research through its research delivery arm, the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR). Whilst no assessment has been made of the reasons why HIV-patients have been told they are ineligible for participation in cancer trials, the Department is committed to ensuring that all patients, including those with HIV, have access to cutting-edge clinical trials, and innovative, lifesaving treatments through the NIHR. The NIHR does not set participant eligibility criteria for individual clinical trials. These are determined by study sponsors and investigators, subject to regulatory and ethics approval. The NIHR continues to welcome high quality applications for research into any aspect of human health and care, including HIV and cancer. These applications are subject to peer review and judged in open competition, with awards being made on the basis of the importance of the topic to the public and health and care services, value for money, and scientific quality. |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
19 May 2026, 9:51 p.m. - House of Lords "respect, and I absolutely share the noble Lord Smith of Finsbury, the " Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
22 Jul 2026, 6:05 p.m. - House of Lords "UK, but I think Lord Smith of Finsbury has done a far better job than I can and you know, it is an absolute critical part. If this " Lord Jamieson (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
22 Jul 2026, 6:22 p.m. - House of Lords "to the noble Lord Lord Smith of Finsbury, when he explains how well " Lord Lansley (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Greater Cambridge Development Corporation (Establishment) Order 2026
20 speeches (7,077 words) Wednesday 22nd July 2026 - Lords Chamber Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government Mentions: 1: Lord Jamieson (Con - Life peer) going to say how important Cambridge is to the economy of the UK, but I think the noble Lord, Lord Smith of Finsbury - Link to Speech 2: Lord Lansley (Con - Life peer) development corporation aligns with the unitary council when it comes.When the noble Lord, Lord Smith of Finsbury - Link to Speech |
|
King’s Speech
149 speeches (53,868 words) Tuesday 19th May 2026 - Lords Chamber Department for Energy Security & Net Zero Mentions: 1: Lord Clement-Jones (LD - Life peer) I absolutely share in the support of the noble Lords, Lord Smith of Finsbury and Lord Willetts, the noble - Link to Speech |