Information between 19th April 2024 - 4th April 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
Division Votes |
---|
22 Apr 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Smith of Finsbury voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House One of 4 Non-affiliated Aye votes vs 7 Non-affiliated No votes Tally: Ayes - 240 Noes - 211 |
5 Nov 2024 - Crown Estate Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Smith of Finsbury voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 127 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 74 Noes - 147 |
5 Nov 2024 - Crown Estate Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Smith of Finsbury voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 131 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 220 Noes - 139 |
5 Nov 2024 - Crown Estate Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Smith of Finsbury voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 134 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 193 Noes - 226 |
5 Feb 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Smith of Finsbury voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 121 Labour No votes vs 4 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 318 Noes - 130 |
5 Feb 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Smith of Finsbury voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 128 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 302 Noes - 132 |
24 Mar 2025 - Local Authorities (Changes to Years of Ordinary Elections) (England) Order 2025 - View Vote Context Lord Smith of Finsbury voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 145 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 139 Noes - 152 |
24 Mar 2025 - Local Authorities (Changes to Years of Ordinary Elections) (England) Order 2025 - View Vote Context Lord Smith of Finsbury voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 147 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 63 Noes - 163 |
24 Mar 2025 - National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Smith of Finsbury voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 154 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 273 Noes - 172 |
13 Jan 2025 - Great British Energy Bill - View Vote Context Lord Smith of Finsbury voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 102 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 122 Noes - 120 |
5 Mar 2025 - Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Smith of Finsbury voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 139 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 228 |
5 Mar 2025 - Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Smith of Finsbury voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 143 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 86 Noes - 159 |
5 Mar 2025 - Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Smith of Finsbury voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 131 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 146 Noes - 189 |
5 Mar 2025 - Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Smith of Finsbury voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 137 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 174 Noes - 207 |
Written Answers |
---|
Manuel Guerrero
Asked by: Lord Smith of Finsbury (Labour - Life peer) Thursday 23rd May 2024 Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office: To ask His Majesty's Government what representations they are making to the government of Qatar to ensure that Manuel Guerrero, a UK citizen, is either released or provided with the HIV medication that he needs. Answered by Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon Supporting the welfare of British nationals detained overseas is a priority for the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO). The FCDO cannot interfere in the judicial affairs of other countries, however where there are concerns that an individual's welfare needs are not being met, with their consent, we will raise this with the relevant authorities. We are unable to provide comment on the detail of individual consular cases in line with relevant UK data protection legislation. [https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/foreign-commonwealth-development-office/about/personal-information-charter] |
Parliamentary Debates |
---|
Finance Bill
35 speeches (18,789 words) 2nd reading Wednesday 19th March 2025 - Lords Chamber HM Treasury Mentions: 1: Baroness Caine of Kentish Town (Lab - Life peer) That trail was first laid by my noble friend Lord Smith of Finsbury when he was Secretary of State for - Link to Speech |
Museums and Galleries: Admission Charges for Non-UK Residents
21 speeches (1,491 words) Thursday 6th March 2025 - Lords Chamber Mentions: 1: Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con - Life peer) But there are many downsides to reversing the legacy of the noble Lord, Lord Smith of Finsbury. - Link to Speech |