Lord Smith of Finsbury Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Lord Smith of Finsbury

Information between 1st March 2026 - 11th March 2026

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Smith of Finsbury voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 136 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 142 Noes - 140
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Smith of Finsbury voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 147 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 192 Noes - 155
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Smith of Finsbury voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 136 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 143 Noes - 140
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Smith of Finsbury voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 137 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 144 Noes - 143
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Smith of Finsbury voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 135 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 144 Noes - 140
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Smith of Finsbury voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 147 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 202 Noes - 155
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Smith of Finsbury voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 156 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 61 Noes - 178
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Smith of Finsbury voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 154 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 71 Noes - 177
9 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Smith of Finsbury voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 139 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 68 Noes - 183
9 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Smith of Finsbury voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 150 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 75 Noes - 190
9 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Smith of Finsbury voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 139 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 76 Noes - 185
9 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Smith of Finsbury voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 140 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 82 Noes - 151
9 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Smith of Finsbury voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 151 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 200 Noes - 162
9 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Smith of Finsbury voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 152 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 88 Noes - 172
9 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Smith of Finsbury voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 117 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 40 Noes - 123


Written Answers
Immigration: English Language
Asked by: Lord Smith of Finsbury (Labour - Life peer)
Friday 6th March 2026

Question to the Home Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the potential (1) risks, and (2) benefits, of adopting an entirely remote delivery model for the proposed Home Office English Language Testing service.

Answered by Lord Hanson of Flint - Minister of State (Home Office)

The Home Office has carefully considered both the risks and benefits of an entirely remote delivery model as part of the procurement to replace current Secure English Language Testing arrangements.

The key risks centre on maintaining the integrity and security of the immigration system, including identity assurance, protection against impersonation, and confidence in the reliability of test results. The Home Office has engaged the market to understand what capability is available to maintain high standards of security and integrity and has developed a robust security schedule and solution requirements to ensure this remains at the heart of the digital by default solution. Following rounds of pre-market engagement, the ongoing procurement is explicitly designed to test bidders' ability to meet these standards, and the Department will adopt only those solutions that demonstrably maintain the high level of assurance required.

The expected benefits include improved accessibility and customer service by removing physical barriers for applicants, stronger protections against fraud through enhanced security measures, and better value for money for applicants and the taxpayer.

NHS: Insurance
Asked by: Lord Smith of Finsbury (Labour - Life peer)
Wednesday 11th March 2026

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask His Majesty's Government what consideration they have given to ensuring that NHS collective insurance cover can be extended to provide cover for when clinical services are commissioned by local authorities.

Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)

When local authorities commission clinical services through the National Health Service, any liability arising from clinical negligence is covered by the Clinical Negligence Scheme for Trusts (CNST), where the service is provided by an NHS trust, and the Clinical Negligence Scheme for General Practice (CNSGP), where the service is delivered by general practices under NHS contracts, namely the Personal Medical Services contract, the Additional Medical Services contract, and/or the General Medical Services contract. CNST and CNSGP are state indemnity schemes administered by NHS Resolution.

There are currently no plans to extend the scope of CNST or CNSGP to cover other clinical services commissioned by local authorities.