Right to Die Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Ministry of Justice

Right to Die

Lord Singh of Wimbledon Excerpts
Thursday 14th July 2016

(8 years, 4 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Faulks Portrait Lord Faulks
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The Government recognise that strong views are held on this subject on both sides. It remains the Government’s view that any change in the law is an area for individual conscience and a matter for Parliament to decide rather than for government policy. The noble Baroness and the House will remember the lengthy, thorough and extremely illuminating debates we had last year or the year before in relation to the Private Member’s Bill proposed by the noble and learned Lord, Lord Falconer. Since then, there has been a Bill in the House of Commons which was defeated at Second Reading.

Lord Singh of Wimbledon Portrait Lord Singh of Wimbledon (CB)
- Hansard - -

My Lords, social as well as medical factors can influence a decision to live, and greedy or uncaring relatives can easily influence that decision—we hear about that every day in the press and in care homes. Does the Minister agree that greater efforts should be made to show that we value all people, whatever their degree of sickness or disability, and that society must work towards better palliative care?

Lord Faulks Portrait Lord Faulks
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am sure that all noble Lords would agree with what the noble Lord said, whatever their views about the issue.