Arrangement of Business Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Lord Shutt of Greetland

Main Page: Lord Shutt of Greetland (Liberal Democrat - Life peer)

Arrangement of Business

Lord Shutt of Greetland Excerpts
Tuesday 29th June 2010

(14 years, 4 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lord Shutt of Greetland Portrait Lord Shutt of Greetland
- Hansard - -

My Lords, there are 67 speakers signed up for today’s debate. If Back-Bench contributions are kept to seven minutes, the House should be able to rise at around midnight.

Earl of Onslow Portrait The Earl of Onslow
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, is it really satisfactory to ask people whose average age is about 1,006 to stay up till 12 o’clock, and to have 67 speakers all on one day on one Motion? I would hope that the usual channels could look into this and come up with something which was slightly more satisfactory.

None Portrait Noble Lords
- Hansard -

Hear, hear!

Lord Shutt of Greetland Portrait Lord Shutt of Greetland
- Hansard - -

My Lords, when the Motion was set down, no one had any idea how many speakers there would be. It so happens that 10 per cent of your Lordships are desirous of speaking. In those circumstances, seven minutes is about right for a midnight rising time. Of course, if noble Lords spoke for five minutes, they could be ready to go at 10 pm.

Lord Corbett of Castle Vale Portrait Lord Corbett of Castle Vale
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Given that we now know the number of noble Lords who wish to take part in this debate, what on earth is the problem about finishing it at the more reasonable time of 10 o’clock and going into a second day? If the Government do not want to hear the views of noble Lords all around the Chamber, they should say so. This is nonsense; it is just waffling.