Lord Sharpe of Epsom Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Lord Sharpe of Epsom

Information between 20th March 2026 - 30th March 2026

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Calendar
Thursday 23rd April 2026 11 a.m.
Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative - Life peer)

Oral questions - Main Chamber
Subject: Incentivising investment in and strengthen the long-term competitiveness of the steel sector
View calendar - Add to calendar


Division Votes
23 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Sharpe of Epsom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 128 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 188 Noes - 155
23 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Sharpe of Epsom voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 156 Conservative No votes vs 2 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 202 Noes - 225
23 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Sharpe of Epsom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 133 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 198 Noes - 159
23 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Sharpe of Epsom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 163 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 241 Noes - 175
24 Mar 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Sharpe of Epsom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 121 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 187 Noes - 157
24 Mar 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Sharpe of Epsom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 163 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 250 Noes - 158
24 Mar 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Sharpe of Epsom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 175 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 285 Noes - 156
24 Mar 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Sharpe of Epsom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 40 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 70 Noes - 132
25 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Sharpe of Epsom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 81 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 95 Noes - 137
25 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Sharpe of Epsom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 133 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 205 Noes - 147
25 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Sharpe of Epsom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 135 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 200 Noes - 150
25 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Sharpe of Epsom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 168 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 306 Noes - 145
25 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Sharpe of Epsom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 134 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 207 Noes - 148
25 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Sharpe of Epsom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 136 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 163 Noes - 195
25 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Sharpe of Epsom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 160 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 266 Noes - 141
26 Mar 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Sharpe of Epsom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 115 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 152 Noes - 128
26 Mar 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Sharpe of Epsom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 101 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 115 Noes - 197
26 Mar 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Sharpe of Epsom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 104 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 171 Noes - 146


Speeches
Lord Sharpe of Epsom speeches from: UK Steel Strategy
Lord Sharpe of Epsom contributed 1 speech (1,241 words)
Monday 23rd March 2026 - Lords Chamber
Department for Business and Trade


Written Answers
British Steel: Scunthorpe
Asked by: Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative - Life peer)
Tuesday 24th March 2026

Question to the Department for Business and Trade:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Lloyd of Effra on 9 March (HL14773), what assessment they have made of whether the blast furnaces at Scunthorpe steelworks are critical national security assets.

Answered by Baroness Lloyd of Effra - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

The Government has reviewed the role of the Scunthorpe steelworks in contributing to the UK's national security including critical national infrastructure. The Government maintains that securing the continued operation of British Steel's assets is a necessary investment in our national interests and wider economic resilience.

Funding for British Steel is subject to the usual government approval processes and ministerial decisions and the need for HMG support is kept under review. All efforts are being made to secure a viable future for the company. All support for British Steel has been drawn from existing HMG budgets.

British Steel remains in the ownership of Jingye and estimated costs should the blast furnaces need to be decommissioned is commercially sensitive information. We continue to work with Jingye to find a pragmatic, realistic solution for the future of British Steel.

The £104 million detailed for other operational expenses will be reflected in the Department for Business and Trade's accounts for 2025-26. The accounts will be prepared on a basis consistent with government financial reporting standards.

British Steel are responsible for ensuring all tax liabilities and obligations pursuant to the UK Emissions Trading Scheme are met. Under the Companies Act 2006, the responsibility to produce accounts belongs to company directors.

British Steel: Scunthorpe
Asked by: Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative - Life peer)
Tuesday 24th March 2026

Question to the Department for Business and Trade:

To ask His Majesty's Government what plans they have, if any, for decommissioning the blast furnaces at the Scunthorpe steelworks; and what estimate they have made of the cost of decommissioning.

Answered by Baroness Lloyd of Effra - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

The Government has reviewed the role of the Scunthorpe steelworks in contributing to the UK's national security including critical national infrastructure. The Government maintains that securing the continued operation of British Steel's assets is a necessary investment in our national interests and wider economic resilience.

Funding for British Steel is subject to the usual government approval processes and ministerial decisions and the need for HMG support is kept under review. All efforts are being made to secure a viable future for the company. All support for British Steel has been drawn from existing HMG budgets.

British Steel remains in the ownership of Jingye and estimated costs should the blast furnaces need to be decommissioned is commercially sensitive information. We continue to work with Jingye to find a pragmatic, realistic solution for the future of British Steel.

The £104 million detailed for other operational expenses will be reflected in the Department for Business and Trade's accounts for 2025-26. The accounts will be prepared on a basis consistent with government financial reporting standards.

British Steel are responsible for ensuring all tax liabilities and obligations pursuant to the UK Emissions Trading Scheme are met. Under the Companies Act 2006, the responsibility to produce accounts belongs to company directors.

British Steel: Scunthorpe
Asked by: Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative - Life peer)
Tuesday 24th March 2026

Question to the Department for Business and Trade:

To ask His Majesty's Government how long they plan to fund the operation of the Scunthorpe steelworks; and what is the maximum budget for funding those steelworks.

Answered by Baroness Lloyd of Effra - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

The Government has reviewed the role of the Scunthorpe steelworks in contributing to the UK's national security including critical national infrastructure. The Government maintains that securing the continued operation of British Steel's assets is a necessary investment in our national interests and wider economic resilience.

Funding for British Steel is subject to the usual government approval processes and ministerial decisions and the need for HMG support is kept under review. All efforts are being made to secure a viable future for the company. All support for British Steel has been drawn from existing HMG budgets.

British Steel remains in the ownership of Jingye and estimated costs should the blast furnaces need to be decommissioned is commercially sensitive information. We continue to work with Jingye to find a pragmatic, realistic solution for the future of British Steel.

The £104 million detailed for other operational expenses will be reflected in the Department for Business and Trade's accounts for 2025-26. The accounts will be prepared on a basis consistent with government financial reporting standards.

British Steel are responsible for ensuring all tax liabilities and obligations pursuant to the UK Emissions Trading Scheme are met. Under the Companies Act 2006, the responsibility to produce accounts belongs to company directors.

British Steel: Company Accounts
Asked by: Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative - Life peer)
Tuesday 24th March 2026

Question to the Department for Business and Trade:

To ask His Majesty's Government who is responsible for the publication of British Steel's statutory accounts for the year ending 31 December 2024.

Answered by Baroness Lloyd of Effra - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

The Government has reviewed the role of the Scunthorpe steelworks in contributing to the UK's national security including critical national infrastructure. The Government maintains that securing the continued operation of British Steel's assets is a necessary investment in our national interests and wider economic resilience.

Funding for British Steel is subject to the usual government approval processes and ministerial decisions and the need for HMG support is kept under review. All efforts are being made to secure a viable future for the company. All support for British Steel has been drawn from existing HMG budgets.

British Steel remains in the ownership of Jingye and estimated costs should the blast furnaces need to be decommissioned is commercially sensitive information. We continue to work with Jingye to find a pragmatic, realistic solution for the future of British Steel.

The £104 million detailed for other operational expenses will be reflected in the Department for Business and Trade's accounts for 2025-26. The accounts will be prepared on a basis consistent with government financial reporting standards.

British Steel are responsible for ensuring all tax liabilities and obligations pursuant to the UK Emissions Trading Scheme are met. Under the Companies Act 2006, the responsibility to produce accounts belongs to company directors.

British Steel: Scunthorpe
Asked by: Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative - Life peer)
Tuesday 24th March 2026

Question to the Department for Business and Trade:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Lloyd of Effra on 9 March (HL14773), whether they will publish a breakdown of the £104 million provided to British Steel for "other operational expenses".

Answered by Baroness Lloyd of Effra - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

The Government has reviewed the role of the Scunthorpe steelworks in contributing to the UK's national security including critical national infrastructure. The Government maintains that securing the continued operation of British Steel's assets is a necessary investment in our national interests and wider economic resilience.

Funding for British Steel is subject to the usual government approval processes and ministerial decisions and the need for HMG support is kept under review. All efforts are being made to secure a viable future for the company. All support for British Steel has been drawn from existing HMG budgets.

British Steel remains in the ownership of Jingye and estimated costs should the blast furnaces need to be decommissioned is commercially sensitive information. We continue to work with Jingye to find a pragmatic, realistic solution for the future of British Steel.

The £104 million detailed for other operational expenses will be reflected in the Department for Business and Trade's accounts for 2025-26. The accounts will be prepared on a basis consistent with government financial reporting standards.

British Steel are responsible for ensuring all tax liabilities and obligations pursuant to the UK Emissions Trading Scheme are met. Under the Companies Act 2006, the responsibility to produce accounts belongs to company directors.

British Steel: Expenditure
Asked by: Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative - Life peer)
Tuesday 24th March 2026

Question to the Department for Business and Trade:

To ask His Majesty's Government who is responsible for non-cash expenditure at British Steel, including carbon obligations under the EU Emissions Trading Scheme and UK tax liabilities such as landfill tax.

Answered by Baroness Lloyd of Effra - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

The Government has reviewed the role of the Scunthorpe steelworks in contributing to the UK's national security including critical national infrastructure. The Government maintains that securing the continued operation of British Steel's assets is a necessary investment in our national interests and wider economic resilience.

Funding for British Steel is subject to the usual government approval processes and ministerial decisions and the need for HMG support is kept under review. All efforts are being made to secure a viable future for the company. All support for British Steel has been drawn from existing HMG budgets.

British Steel remains in the ownership of Jingye and estimated costs should the blast furnaces need to be decommissioned is commercially sensitive information. We continue to work with Jingye to find a pragmatic, realistic solution for the future of British Steel.

The £104 million detailed for other operational expenses will be reflected in the Department for Business and Trade's accounts for 2025-26. The accounts will be prepared on a basis consistent with government financial reporting standards.

British Steel are responsible for ensuring all tax liabilities and obligations pursuant to the UK Emissions Trading Scheme are met. Under the Companies Act 2006, the responsibility to produce accounts belongs to company directors.




Lord Sharpe of Epsom mentioned

Live Transcript

Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm.

23 Mar 2026, 6:35 p.m. - House of Commons
"Lord Sharpe, of Epsom in the other place would have protected our beer gardens from being designated smoke free and would have allowed "
Jack Rankin MP (Windsor, Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript


Parliamentary Debates
Tobacco and Vapes Bill
51 speeches (11,551 words)
Consideration of Lords amendments
Monday 23rd March 2026 - Commons Chamber
Department of Health and Social Care
Mentions:
1: Jack Rankin (Con - Windsor) wonder that landlords are barring MPs from their pubs.Amendments tabled in the other place by Lord Sharpe of Epsom - Link to Speech