Information between 18th April 2026 - 28th May 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Tuesday 28th April 2026 Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative - Life peer) Oral questions - Main Chamber Subject: Impact on businesses of the recent RMT strikes on London Underground services and plans to mitigate such impact during future strikes View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 20th May 2026 Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative - Life peer) Private Notice Question - Main Chamber Subject: Supermarket pricing View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
20 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Sharpe of Epsom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 169 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 284 Noes - 158 |
|
20 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Sharpe of Epsom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 143 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 162 Noes - 151 |
|
20 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Sharpe of Epsom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 143 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 211 Noes - 150 |
|
20 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Sharpe of Epsom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 145 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 216 Noes - 148 |
|
20 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Sharpe of Epsom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 142 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 219 Noes - 144 |
|
20 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Sharpe of Epsom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 173 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 276 Noes - 169 |
|
20 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Sharpe of Epsom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 174 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 259 Noes - 180 |
|
23 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Sharpe of Epsom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 129 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 207 Noes - 141 |
|
23 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Sharpe of Epsom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 131 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 199 Noes - 146 |
|
23 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Sharpe of Epsom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 125 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 197 Noes - 144 |
|
23 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Sharpe of Epsom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 138 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 220 Noes - 143 |
|
23 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Sharpe of Epsom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 126 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 208 Noes - 138 |
|
23 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Sharpe of Epsom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 130 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 209 Noes - 145 |
|
23 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Sharpe of Epsom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 138 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 152 Noes - 207 |
|
27 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Sharpe of Epsom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 148 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 199 Noes - 144 |
|
27 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Sharpe of Epsom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 152 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 210 Noes - 145 |
|
27 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Sharpe of Epsom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 155 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 217 Noes - 145 |
|
27 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Sharpe of Epsom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 183 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 316 Noes - 165 |
|
27 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Sharpe of Epsom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 143 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 197 Noes - 129 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Lord Sharpe of Epsom speeches from: 2026 FIFA World Cup: Replica Kit Pricing
Lord Sharpe of Epsom contributed 1 speech (78 words) Wednesday 20th May 2026 - Lords Chamber Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport |
|
Lord Sharpe of Epsom speeches from: Supermarkets: Voluntary Price Caps
Lord Sharpe of Epsom contributed 2 speeches (167 words) Wednesday 20th May 2026 - Lords Chamber HM Treasury |
|
Lord Sharpe of Epsom speeches from: King’s Speech
Lord Sharpe of Epsom contributed 1 speech (1,160 words) Thursday 14th May 2026 - Lords Chamber Cabinet Office |
|
Lord Sharpe of Epsom speeches from: RMT Strikes: Impact on Businesses
Lord Sharpe of Epsom contributed 2 speeches (117 words) Tuesday 28th April 2026 - Lords Chamber Home Office |
|
Lord Sharpe of Epsom speeches from: Steel Sector
Lord Sharpe of Epsom contributed 2 speeches (78 words) Thursday 23rd April 2026 - Lords Chamber Department for Business and Trade |
|
Lord Sharpe of Epsom speeches from: British Industrial Competitiveness Scheme
Lord Sharpe of Epsom contributed 1 speech (965 words) Wednesday 22nd April 2026 - Lords Chamber Department for Business and Trade |
|
Lord Sharpe of Epsom speeches from: Package Travel and Linked Travel Arrangements (Amendment) Regulations 2026
Lord Sharpe of Epsom contributed 2 speeches (1,158 words) Tuesday 21st April 2026 - Lords Chamber Department for Business and Trade |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
British Steel: Company Accounts
Asked by: Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative - Life peer) Wednesday 29th April 2026 Question to the Department for Business and Trade: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the reasons why British Steel has not filed statutory accounts for the year ending 31 December 2024; what discussions they have had with (1) the company, (2) its directors, (3) Companies House, or (4) the Financial Reporting Council, about the delay; and when they expect those accounts to be filed. Answered by Baroness Lloyd of Effra - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) To date, funding of £484m has been provided to British Steel Limited under the provisions of the Steel Industry (Special Measures) Act, and the full amount is recoverable as a debt due to the Crown, as set out in section 3(6) of the Act. There are no conditions attached save the requirement for the funds to be used in accordance with the purpose set out in legislation. All funding released to British Steel is reviewed and approved in advance. Recoverability of this debt is currently being assessed, and the resulting treatment will be reflected and published in the Department for Business and Trade's accounts for 2025-26. HMG has set out its policy and operational intent to British Steel’s auditors under the Steel Industry (Special Measures) Act 2025. This does not constitute a financial guarantee, indemnity or underwriting of liabilities and reflects material already in the public domain. British Steel remains owned by Jingye and HMG’s powers to intervene under the Steel Industry (Special Measures) Act 2025 are designed to maintain steelmaking and avoid a disorderly closure of the blast furnaces. We continue to work with Jingye to find a pragmatic and realistic solution for the future of British Steel. The preparation and filing of statutory accounts are a matter for the company and its directors. The arrangements for preparing and approving company accounts are a matter for British Steel and its directors, in line with their statutory responsibilities. |
|
British Steel: Company Accounts
Asked by: Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative - Life peer) Wednesday 29th April 2026 Question to the Department for Business and Trade: To ask His Majesty's Government what arrangements are in place to enable the directors of British Steel to prepare and approve company accounts. Answered by Baroness Lloyd of Effra - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) To date, funding of £484m has been provided to British Steel Limited under the provisions of the Steel Industry (Special Measures) Act, and the full amount is recoverable as a debt due to the Crown, as set out in section 3(6) of the Act. There are no conditions attached save the requirement for the funds to be used in accordance with the purpose set out in legislation. All funding released to British Steel is reviewed and approved in advance. Recoverability of this debt is currently being assessed, and the resulting treatment will be reflected and published in the Department for Business and Trade's accounts for 2025-26. HMG has set out its policy and operational intent to British Steel’s auditors under the Steel Industry (Special Measures) Act 2025. This does not constitute a financial guarantee, indemnity or underwriting of liabilities and reflects material already in the public domain. British Steel remains owned by Jingye and HMG’s powers to intervene under the Steel Industry (Special Measures) Act 2025 are designed to maintain steelmaking and avoid a disorderly closure of the blast furnaces. We continue to work with Jingye to find a pragmatic and realistic solution for the future of British Steel. The preparation and filing of statutory accounts are a matter for the company and its directors. The arrangements for preparing and approving company accounts are a matter for British Steel and its directors, in line with their statutory responsibilities. |
|
British Steel: Finance
Asked by: Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative - Life peer) Wednesday 29th April 2026 Question to the Department for Business and Trade: To ask His Majesty's Government whether they have provided British Steel, its directors, auditors or creditors with any formal or informal assurance, comfort letter, guarantee, indemnity, undertaking or other indication of continuing financial support for the company; and if so, what is the (1) nature, (2) duration, and (3) legal basis, of that support. Answered by Baroness Lloyd of Effra - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) To date, funding of £484m has been provided to British Steel Limited under the provisions of the Steel Industry (Special Measures) Act, and the full amount is recoverable as a debt due to the Crown, as set out in section 3(6) of the Act. There are no conditions attached save the requirement for the funds to be used in accordance with the purpose set out in legislation. All funding released to British Steel is reviewed and approved in advance. Recoverability of this debt is currently being assessed, and the resulting treatment will be reflected and published in the Department for Business and Trade's accounts for 2025-26. HMG has set out its policy and operational intent to British Steel’s auditors under the Steel Industry (Special Measures) Act 2025. This does not constitute a financial guarantee, indemnity or underwriting of liabilities and reflects material already in the public domain. British Steel remains owned by Jingye and HMG’s powers to intervene under the Steel Industry (Special Measures) Act 2025 are designed to maintain steelmaking and avoid a disorderly closure of the blast furnaces. We continue to work with Jingye to find a pragmatic and realistic solution for the future of British Steel. The preparation and filing of statutory accounts are a matter for the company and its directors. The arrangements for preparing and approving company accounts are a matter for British Steel and its directors, in line with their statutory responsibilities. |
|
British Steel: Finance
Asked by: Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative - Life peer) Wednesday 29th April 2026 Question to the Department for Business and Trade: To ask His Majesty's Government what is the total amount of funding provided to British Steel since 12 April 2025; what proportion of that funding is classified as debt to the Crown; and whether any formal loan agreement, interest rate, repayment scheme, security or repayment trigger has been agreed. Answered by Baroness Lloyd of Effra - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) To date, funding of £484m has been provided to British Steel Limited under the provisions of the Steel Industry (Special Measures) Act, and the full amount is recoverable as a debt due to the Crown, as set out in section 3(6) of the Act. There are no conditions attached save the requirement for the funds to be used in accordance with the purpose set out in legislation. All funding released to British Steel is reviewed and approved in advance. Recoverability of this debt is currently being assessed, and the resulting treatment will be reflected and published in the Department for Business and Trade's accounts for 2025-26. HMG has set out its policy and operational intent to British Steel’s auditors under the Steel Industry (Special Measures) Act 2025. This does not constitute a financial guarantee, indemnity or underwriting of liabilities and reflects material already in the public domain. British Steel remains owned by Jingye and HMG’s powers to intervene under the Steel Industry (Special Measures) Act 2025 are designed to maintain steelmaking and avoid a disorderly closure of the blast furnaces. We continue to work with Jingye to find a pragmatic and realistic solution for the future of British Steel. The preparation and filing of statutory accounts are a matter for the company and its directors. The arrangements for preparing and approving company accounts are a matter for British Steel and its directors, in line with their statutory responsibilities. |
|
British Steel: Finance
Asked by: Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative - Life peer) Wednesday 29th April 2026 Question to the Department for Business and Trade: To ask His Majesty's Government whether British Steel is currently trading on a going concern basis; and if so, whether trading on that basis relies on financial support from (1) HM Government, (2) Jingye, (3) another third party, or (4) a combination of those sources. Answered by Baroness Lloyd of Effra - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) To date, funding of £484m has been provided to British Steel Limited under the provisions of the Steel Industry (Special Measures) Act, and the full amount is recoverable as a debt due to the Crown, as set out in section 3(6) of the Act. There are no conditions attached save the requirement for the funds to be used in accordance with the purpose set out in legislation. All funding released to British Steel is reviewed and approved in advance. Recoverability of this debt is currently being assessed, and the resulting treatment will be reflected and published in the Department for Business and Trade's accounts for 2025-26. HMG has set out its policy and operational intent to British Steel’s auditors under the Steel Industry (Special Measures) Act 2025. This does not constitute a financial guarantee, indemnity or underwriting of liabilities and reflects material already in the public domain. British Steel remains owned by Jingye and HMG’s powers to intervene under the Steel Industry (Special Measures) Act 2025 are designed to maintain steelmaking and avoid a disorderly closure of the blast furnaces. We continue to work with Jingye to find a pragmatic and realistic solution for the future of British Steel. The preparation and filing of statutory accounts are a matter for the company and its directors. The arrangements for preparing and approving company accounts are a matter for British Steel and its directors, in line with their statutory responsibilities. |
|
British Steel: Finance
Asked by: Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative - Life peer) Wednesday 29th April 2026 Question to the Department for Business and Trade: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the likelihood that British Steel will repay the government funding provided since 12 April 2025; and whether any impairment, write-off or provision has been (1) made, or (2) considered, in relation to that funding. Answered by Baroness Lloyd of Effra - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) To date, funding of £484m has been provided to British Steel Limited under the provisions of the Steel Industry (Special Measures) Act, and the full amount is recoverable as a debt due to the Crown, as set out in section 3(6) of the Act. There are no conditions attached save the requirement for the funds to be used in accordance with the purpose set out in legislation. All funding released to British Steel is reviewed and approved in advance. Recoverability of this debt is currently being assessed, and the resulting treatment will be reflected and published in the Department for Business and Trade's accounts for 2025-26. HMG has set out its policy and operational intent to British Steel’s auditors under the Steel Industry (Special Measures) Act 2025. This does not constitute a financial guarantee, indemnity or underwriting of liabilities and reflects material already in the public domain. British Steel remains owned by Jingye and HMG’s powers to intervene under the Steel Industry (Special Measures) Act 2025 are designed to maintain steelmaking and avoid a disorderly closure of the blast furnaces. We continue to work with Jingye to find a pragmatic and realistic solution for the future of British Steel. The preparation and filing of statutory accounts are a matter for the company and its directors. The arrangements for preparing and approving company accounts are a matter for British Steel and its directors, in line with their statutory responsibilities. |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
23 Apr 2026, 11:08 a.m. - House of Lords " >> First Oral Question Lord Sharpe of Epsom. My Lords, I beg leave to ask the question. Standing in my name on the Order Paper. " Lord Stockwood, Minister of State (Department for Business and Trade) (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
28 Apr 2026, 3:11 p.m. - House of Lords "passengers that use the railways. >> Both oral question Lord Sharpe of Epsom beg leave. >> To ask the question standing in " Baroness Blake of Leeds (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
14 May 2026, 5:09 p.m. - House of Lords "friend Lord Sharpe of Epsom highlighted how little the Gracious Speech does for SMEs already facing " Baroness Neville-Rolfe (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
14 May 2026, 5:19 p.m. - House of Lords "are regularly reviewed. The Lord Sharpe of Epsom noble Lord Lord Sharpe of Epsom asked about " Lord Livermore (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
14 May 2026, 5:20 p.m. - House of Lords "of 38 UK businesses every day. This was mentioned, too, by the noble Lord Lord Sharpe of Epsom, who also " Lord Livermore (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
20 May 2026, 3:51 p.m. - House of Lords " Private notice question on supermarket pricing. Lord Sharpe of Epsom. >> My Lords, I beg leave to ask a question of which I have given " Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
19 May 2026, 9:55 p.m. - House of Lords "where it was trained. The noble Lord Lord Sharpe of Epsom raised the same concern from the " Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
King’s Speech
149 speeches (53,868 words) Tuesday 19th May 2026 - Lords Chamber Department for Energy Security & Net Zero Mentions: 1: Lord Clement-Jones (LD - Life peer) The noble Lord, Lord Sharpe of Epsom, raised the same concern from the Conservative Benches last week - Link to Speech |
|
King’s Speech
87 speeches (53,409 words) Thursday 14th May 2026 - Lords Chamber Cabinet Office Mentions: 1: Baroness Neville-Rolfe (Con - Life peer) together having a devastating effect on the cost of goods, especially vehicles.My noble friend Lord Sharpe of Epsom - Link to Speech 2: Lord Livermore (Lab - Life peer) The noble Lord, Lord Sharpe of Epsom, asked about safeguards to ensure that decisions remain independent - Link to Speech |
| Non-Departmental Publications - Transparency |
|---|
|
Nov. 06 2024
Independent Adviser on Ministerial Standards Source Page: Previous lists of ministers' interests Document: (PDF) Transparency Found: Lord Sharpe of Epsom, Government Whip 5. |
| Deposited Papers |
|---|
|
Thursday 30th April 2026
Department for Business and Trade Source Page: Letter dated 28/04/2026 from Baroness Lloyd of Effra to Lord Sharpe regarding a debate on the British Industrial Competitiveness Scheme: correction to a statement concerning electricity prices. 1p. Document: B_Lloyd_to_L_Sharpe_BICS_28_04_2026.pdf (PDF) Found: Place Whitehall London SW1A 2DY Lord Sharpe of Epsom |