Lord Shamash Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Lord Shamash

Information between 15th July 2026 - 13th September 2026

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
22 Jul 2026 - Universal Credit, Personal Independence Payment, Jobseeker’s Allowance and Employment and Support Allowance (Decisions and Appeals) (Amendment) Regulations 2026 - View Vote Context
Lord Shamash voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 68 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 64 Noes - 95
21 Jul 2026 - Business of the House - View Vote Context
Lord Shamash voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 150 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 173 Noes - 234
15 Jul 2026 - Sporting Events Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Lord Shamash voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 153 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 212 Noes - 171
15 Jul 2026 - Sporting Events Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Lord Shamash voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 142 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 57 Noes - 154
15 Jul 2026 - Sporting Events Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Lord Shamash voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 141 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 129 Noes - 188
9 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Lord Shamash voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 131 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 196 Noes - 138
9 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Lord Shamash voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 127 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 194 Noes - 138
9 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Lord Shamash voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 142 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 226 Noes - 162
9 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Lord Shamash voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 120 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 188 Noes - 125
7 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Lord Shamash voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 149 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 247 Noes - 165
7 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Lord Shamash voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 144 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 76 Noes - 164
7 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Lord Shamash voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 115 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 26 Noes - 119
7 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Lord Shamash voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 133 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 59 Noes - 144
7 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Lord Shamash voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 151 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 69 Noes - 171
8 Sep 2026 - Plant Health, Seeds, Seed Potatoes and Plant Propagating Material (Amendment) (Northern Ireland) Regulations 2026 - View Vote Context
Lord Shamash voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 58 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 26 Noes - 63



Lord Shamash mentioned

Deposited Papers
Monday 27th July 2026
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Source Page: Letter dated 21/07/2026 from Lord Lemos to Peers regarding the debate on political party finance and the role of the Electoral Commission: further detail on issues raised concerning: the government's response to the Rycroft review, cryptoassets, overseas electors, company donations rules - revenue vs. profit tests, Electoral Commission enforcement powers, campaign spending limits, donations to candidates, public funding of political parties, electoral law consolidation, voter ID, a Private Members' Bill on lobbying transparency, citizen/eligibility, and election petitions. 6p.
Document: Letter_Lord_Lemos_PoliticalPartyFinanceandRoleElectoralCommission.pdf (PDF)

Found: Election Petition The noble Lord Shamash suggested the Government should review the existing arrangements