Information between 3rd July 2023 - 23rd April 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
Division Votes |
---|
4 Jul 2023 - Strikes (Minimum Service Levels) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Selkirk of Douglas voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 184 Conservative No votes vs 1 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 223 Noes - 204 |
4 Jul 2023 - National Security Bill - View Vote Context Lord Selkirk of Douglas voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 182 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 201 Noes - 210 |
3 Jul 2023 - Illegal Migration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Selkirk of Douglas voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 131 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 187 Noes - 139 |
3 Jul 2023 - Illegal Migration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Selkirk of Douglas voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 145 Conservative No votes vs 1 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 214 Noes - 150 |
3 Jul 2023 - Illegal Migration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Selkirk of Douglas voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 148 Conservative No votes vs 1 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 202 Noes - 154 |
3 Jul 2023 - Illegal Migration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Selkirk of Douglas voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 149 Conservative No votes vs 1 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 218 Noes - 158 |
3 Jul 2023 - Illegal Migration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Selkirk of Douglas voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 122 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 153 Noes - 128 |
5 Jul 2023 - Illegal Migration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Selkirk of Douglas voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 166 Conservative No votes vs 1 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 235 Noes - 185 |
5 Jul 2023 - Illegal Migration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Selkirk of Douglas voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 163 Conservative No votes vs 1 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 232 Noes - 178 |
5 Jul 2023 - Illegal Migration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Selkirk of Douglas voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 147 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 188 Noes - 158 |
5 Jul 2023 - Illegal Migration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Selkirk of Douglas voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 155 Conservative No votes vs 7 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 232 Noes - 169 |
10 Jul 2023 - Online Safety Bill - View Vote Context Lord Selkirk of Douglas voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 161 Conservative No votes vs 5 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 240 Noes - 168 |
11 Jul 2023 - Levelling-up and Regeneration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Selkirk of Douglas voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 181 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 212 Noes - 208 |
11 Jul 2023 - Levelling-up and Regeneration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Selkirk of Douglas voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 180 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 217 Noes - 192 |
11 Jul 2023 - Levelling-up and Regeneration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Selkirk of Douglas voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 176 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 207 Noes - 189 |
11 Jul 2023 - Levelling-up and Regeneration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Selkirk of Douglas voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 159 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 169 Noes - 167 |
11 Jul 2023 - Levelling-up and Regeneration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Selkirk of Douglas voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 179 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 202 Noes - 194 |
12 Jul 2023 - Illegal Migration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Selkirk of Douglas voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 144 Conservative No votes vs 1 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 217 Noes - 151 |
12 Jul 2023 - Illegal Migration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Selkirk of Douglas voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 136 Conservative No votes vs 2 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 207 Noes - 140 |
12 Jul 2023 - Illegal Migration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Selkirk of Douglas voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 111 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 157 Noes - 114 |
12 Jul 2023 - Illegal Migration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Selkirk of Douglas voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 103 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 154 Noes - 107 |
12 Jul 2023 - Online Safety Bill - View Vote Context Lord Selkirk of Douglas voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 159 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 211 Noes - 171 |
12 Jul 2023 - Illegal Migration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Selkirk of Douglas voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 118 Conservative No votes vs 3 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 174 Noes - 122 |
12 Jul 2023 - Illegal Migration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Selkirk of Douglas voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 144 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 212 Noes - 151 |
12 Jul 2023 - Illegal Migration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Selkirk of Douglas voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 140 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 202 Noes - 144 |
12 Jul 2023 - Illegal Migration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Selkirk of Douglas voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 137 Conservative No votes vs 3 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 220 Noes - 141 |
12 Jul 2023 - Illegal Migration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Selkirk of Douglas voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 138 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 209 Noes - 143 |
17 Jul 2023 - Illegal Migration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Selkirk of Douglas voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 202 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 200 Noes - 217 |
17 Jul 2023 - Illegal Migration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Selkirk of Douglas voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 204 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 193 Noes - 213 |
17 Jul 2023 - Illegal Migration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Selkirk of Douglas voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 198 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 200 Noes - 207 |
17 Jul 2023 - Illegal Migration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Selkirk of Douglas voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 199 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 166 Noes - 201 |
17 Jul 2023 - Illegal Migration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Selkirk of Douglas voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 197 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 193 Noes - 205 |
13 Jul 2023 - Levelling-up and Regeneration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Selkirk of Douglas voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 146 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 162 Noes - 157 |
13 Jul 2023 - Levelling-up and Regeneration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Selkirk of Douglas voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 144 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 162 Noes - 157 |
13 Jul 2023 - Levelling-up and Regeneration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Selkirk of Douglas voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 146 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 164 Noes - 155 |
13 Jul 2023 - Levelling-up and Regeneration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Selkirk of Douglas voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 145 Conservative No votes vs 1 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 169 Noes - 156 |
18 Jul 2023 - Levelling-up and Regeneration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Selkirk of Douglas voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 195 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 195 Noes - 216 |
18 Jul 2023 - Levelling-up and Regeneration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Selkirk of Douglas voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 199 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 185 Noes - 221 |
Speeches |
---|
Lord Selkirk of Douglas speeches from: Prison: Support for Dependent Children
Lord Selkirk of Douglas contributed 1 speech (31 words) Tuesday 18th July 2023 - Lords Chamber Department for Education |
Written Answers |
---|
Vladimir Putin
Asked by: Lord Selkirk of Douglas (Conservative - Life peer) Monday 3rd July 2023 Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office: To ask His Majesty's Government what consideration they have given to whether they would grant permission for Vladimir Putin to enter the UK. Answered by Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon The UK has made clear, for the avoidance of any doubt, that President Putin would not be welcome in the UK. FCDO officials re-emphasised this to senior officials at the Russian Embassy in the UK at a face-to-face meeting in early April. The UK sanctioned President Putin and applied an asset freeze shortly after Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022. |
Russia: Crimes against Humanity
Asked by: Lord Selkirk of Douglas (Conservative - Life peer) Tuesday 4th July 2023 Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office: To ask His Majesty's Government, in the light of reports that Russian soldiers are castrating Ukrainian prisoners in prisoner of war camps, what assessment they have made of whether Russian soldiers are repeatedly committing crimes against humanity. Answered by Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon Russia's illegal invasion of Ukraine is marked by increasing evidence of war crimes and crimes against humanity against Ukrainian service personnel and civilians, including executions, torture and sexual violence. We are fully committed to holding Russian forces to account for any atrocities that have been committed in Ukraine. Established accountability mechanisms, including the International Criminal Court's investigations and Ukrainian domestic judicial processes are investigating all allegations of war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide. The UK continues to support these independent investigations, including by establishing the Atrocity Crimes Advisory Group with the US and EU to provide practical and financial support to assist the War Crimes Unit of the Office of the Prosecutor General of Ukraine. |
Cystic Fibrosis
Asked by: Lord Selkirk of Douglas (Conservative - Life peer) Tuesday 4th July 2023 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask His Majesty's Government when patient organisations such as Cystic Fibrosis Trust, whose Clinical Trials Accelerator Platform informed the design of Clinical Trial Acceleration Networks, will be able to share lessons to feed into the implementation update for the O'Shaughnessy Review. Answered by Lord Markham - Shadow Minister (Science, Innovation and Technology) The Government appointed Lord James O’Shaughnessy to carry out an independent review into United Kingdom commercial clinical trials. Following publication of the review on May 26, the Government made five headline commitments to improve the commercial clinical trials system backed by £121 million. This included £20 million to establish two or three new Clinical Trial Acceleration Networks which will bring together several existing mechanisms to create a joined-up approach to clinical trials, focusing on accelerating priority areas of research and delivering best practice. An update on implementation will be provided in Autumn, which will outline progress against these commitments as well as responding in full to the review recommendations. Implementation of the five headline commitments and the full review response will be informed by consultation with the UK clinical trials community including individual medical research charities and the Association of Medical Research Charities, of which the Cystic Fibrosis Trust is a member. |
Cystic Fibrosis
Asked by: Lord Selkirk of Douglas (Conservative - Life peer) Tuesday 4th July 2023 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask His Majesty's Government what consideration they have given to support for people living with long-term conditions such as cystic fibrosis, following the publication of the report Your life and CF by the Cystic Fibrosis Trust on 6 June, which found that one in five people affected by that condition missed a hospital appointment in the past 12 months due to cost. Answered by Lord Markham - Shadow Minister (Science, Innovation and Technology) People with long term conditions such as cystic fibrosis who are eligible for financial assistance through the Healthcare Travel Costs Scheme can claim a refund of reasonable travel costs. Travel expenses should be calculated by reference to the cheapest means of transport that is reasonable for the patient. This can include journeys made in a private vehicle. To help alleviate cost pressures associated with travel for appointments, NHS England is supporting NHS providers to embed, spread and use video consultations innovatively across their services. The decision on whether an appointment needs to take place face-to-face, on video or by telephone will be made by an expert clinician based on patients’ individual care needs and preferences. |
Parliamentary Debates |
---|
Death of a Former Member: Lord Selkirk of Douglas
2 speeches (39 words) Wednesday 29th November 2023 - Lords Chamber |
Retirements of Members: Lord Hylton and Lord Selkirk of Douglas
2 speeches (59 words) Monday 4th September 2023 - Lords Chamber Mentions: 1: Lord McFall of Alcluith (Lord Speaker - Life peer) the House of the retirement with effect from 27 July of the noble Lords, Lord Hylton and Lord Selkirk of Douglas - Link to Speech |