Cyclists: Road Traffic Laws Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Home Office

Cyclists: Road Traffic Laws

Lord Scott of Foscote Excerpts
Monday 18th April 2016

(8 years, 8 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Berkeley Portrait Lord Berkeley
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, could the Minister confirm that in one sense cyclists are treated unfairly?

Baroness Stowell of Beeston Portrait The Lord Privy Seal (Baroness Stowell of Beeston) (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, I am sorry to interrupt, but I want to make the point that it is the turn of the noble Lord, Lord Berkeley. It was actually the turn of the Labour Benches before but I thought it was right that we kept going in order to save time. Let us go to the Labour Benches now, and if we have time we will go to the Cross Benches.

--- Later in debate ---
Lord Scott of Foscote Portrait Lord Scott of Foscote
- Hansard - -

My Lords, I must declare an interest because I cycle regularly in London. The overriding obligation of cyclists in London is to try to ride their bicycle so as to keep it from contact with other vehicles and particularly from contact with pedestrians. If a cyclist does that, the proposition that he should be prosecuted for some breach of one of the many rules of the road seems to be a little overstretched. Still, if that overriding duty is observed, there should not be any problems with cyclists, and the need to prosecute them for minor infringements is clearly not present.

Lord Keen of Elie Portrait Lord Keen of Elie
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

With regard to the question that has just been posed to the House, I observe that prosecutions in respect of cycling offences are limited to about 1,000 a year at present.