Information between 30th June 2025 - 20th July 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
Division Votes |
---|
30 Jun 2025 - UK-Mauritius Agreement on the Chagos Archipelago - View Vote Context Lord Rooker voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 140 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 185 Noes - 205 |
1 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Rooker voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 139 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 253 Noes - 150 |
1 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Rooker voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 131 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 230 Noes - 137 |
1 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Rooker voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 133 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 221 Noes - 196 |
3 Jul 2025 - Terrorism Act 2000 (Proscribed Organisations) (Amendment) Order 2025 - View Vote Context Lord Rooker voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 74 Labour No votes vs 3 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 16 Noes - 144 |
2 Jul 2025 - House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Rooker voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 144 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 280 Noes - 243 |
2 Jul 2025 - House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Rooker voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 137 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 84 Noes - 263 |
2 Jul 2025 - House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Rooker voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 122 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 55 Noes - 234 |
7 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Rooker voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 140 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 213 Noes - 209 |
7 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Rooker voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 131 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 206 Noes - 198 |
7 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Rooker voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 144 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 274 Noes - 154 |
9 Jul 2025 - House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Rooker voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 140 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 284 Noes - 239 |
9 Jul 2025 - House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Rooker voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 147 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 265 Noes - 247 |
9 Jul 2025 - House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Rooker voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 114 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 11 Noes - 126 |
9 Jul 2025 - House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Rooker voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 134 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 139 Noes - 158 |
15 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Rooker voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 148 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 215 Noes - 240 |
15 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Rooker voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 143 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 237 Noes - 223 |
14 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Rooker voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 144 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 65 Noes - 170 |
14 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Rooker voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 142 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 267 Noes - 153 |
16 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Rooker voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 119 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 47 Noes - 121 |
16 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Rooker voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 127 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 124 Noes - 131 |
16 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Rooker voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 122 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 180 Noes - 123 |
16 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Rooker voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 120 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 148 Noes - 155 |
16 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Rooker voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 121 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 184 Noes - 123 |
16 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Rooker voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 132 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 202 Noes - 138 |
16 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Rooker voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 152 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 304 Noes - 160 |
16 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Rooker voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 145 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 248 Noes - 150 |
Speeches |
---|
Lord Rooker speeches from: House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill
Lord Rooker contributed 1 speech (85 words) Report stage part one Wednesday 9th July 2025 - Lords Chamber Leader of the House |
Lord Rooker speeches from: House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill
Lord Rooker contributed 1 speech (97 words) Report stage part two Wednesday 9th July 2025 - Lords Chamber Leader of the House |
Lord Rooker speeches from: House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill
Lord Rooker contributed 2 speeches (412 words) Report stage part one Wednesday 2nd July 2025 - Lords Chamber Leader of the House |
Lord Rooker speeches from: Renters’ Rights Bill
Lord Rooker contributed 1 speech (54 words) Tuesday 1st July 2025 - Lords Chamber Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government |
Live Transcript |
---|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
2 Jul 2025, 7 p.m. - House of Lords "the power that it has. And the Lord Rooker, and Lord Hunt of Kings Heath " Lord Strathclyde (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
2 Jul 2025, 7:20 p.m. - House of Lords "consider the implications and points that the noble Lord Lord Rooker and " Lord True (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
9 Jul 2025, 10:45 p.m. - House of Lords "and I'm sure if Lord Rooker had sat on the committee of privileges he " Lord Moynihan (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
9 Jul 2025, 10:44 p.m. - House of Lords "committee. Lord Rooker would no " Lord Moynihan (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
Parliamentary Debates |
---|
House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill
95 speeches (19,803 words) Report stage part two Wednesday 9th July 2025 - Lords Chamber Leader of the House Mentions: 1: Lord Moynihan (Con - Excepted Hereditary) ultimately choose to accept, reject or modify any recommendation made by the committee.The noble Lord, Lord Rooker - Link to Speech |
House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill
118 speeches (25,726 words) Report stage part two Wednesday 2nd July 2025 - Lords Chamber Leader of the House Mentions: 1: Baroness Smith of Basildon (Lab - Life peer) However, as my noble friend Lord Rooker said earlier—I have used this line, having heard him use it in - Link to Speech |
House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill
135 speeches (25,182 words) Report stage part one Wednesday 2nd July 2025 - Lords Chamber Leader of the House Mentions: 1: Lord Strathclyde (Con - Excepted Hereditary) The noble Lords, Lord Rooker and Lord Hunt of Kings Heath, are entirely correct in saying that we are - Link to Speech 2: None the case that we should consider the implications and nature of the points that the noble Lord, Lord Rooker - Link to Speech |
Renters’ Rights Bill
101 speeches (23,781 words) Tuesday 1st July 2025 - Lords Chamber Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government Mentions: 1: Baroness Taylor of Stevenage (Lab - Life peer) I was about to say, before the noble Lord, Lord Rooker, intervened, that I am always happy to discuss - Link to Speech |
Humanist Weddings
20 speeches (1,444 words) Monday 30th June 2025 - Lords Chamber Ministry of Justice Mentions: 1: Baroness Thornton (Lab - Life peer) I am channelling my noble friend Lord Rooker on folic acid, and I just hope it is not going to take - Link to Speech |
Calendar |
---|
Wednesday 16th July 2025 10 a.m. Environment and Climate Change Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
Wednesday 3rd September 2025 10 a.m. Environment and Climate Change Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Waste Crime View calendar - Add to calendar |
Select Committee Inquiry |
---|
29 Jul 2025
Waste Crime Environment and Climate Change Committee (Select) Not accepting submissions This short inquiry will consider waste crime, with a focus on serious and organised waste crime such as illegal waste sites and illegal dumping that pose a serious environmental risk. The inquiry will seek to understand the avenues for and prevalent forms of waste crime and their impacts. It will also aim to assess the efficacy of current regulatory, monitoring and enforcement regimes and consider the Government's plans to address the problem. |