Leveson Inquiry Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Ministry of Justice
Wednesday 25th April 2012

(12 years, 6 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Puttnam Portrait Lord Puttnam
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords—

Lord Prescott Portrait Lord Prescott
- Hansard - -

My Lords—

Lord McNally Portrait The Minister of State, Ministry of Justice (Lord McNally)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Perhaps we may hear from the noble Lord, Lord Puttnam, first.

Lord Prescott Portrait Lord Prescott
- Hansard - -

Why is that?

Lord Puttnam Portrait Lord Puttnam
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, while entirely agreeing with the noble Lord, Lord Fowler, that the situation must change, many of us worked in this Chamber for two years on the Enterprise Act 2002 and the Communications Act 2003 to ensure that no Secretary of State was ever placed in the position in which Jeremy Hunt placed himself. We thought that we had achieved that. I agree with the noble Lord, Lord Fowler, that we need to find another way forward.

However, I have a greater concern that I will put to the noble Baroness. On 9 July 2009, David Cameron, who was then the Leader of the Opposition, made a speech that became known as the “bonfire of the quangos” speech. He mentioned only two quangos but picked out Ofcom as one that needed to be trimmed back and to have its powers curtailed. I do not think that there is anyone in this Chamber or in the other place at the moment who would suggest that this is a moment for Ofcom’s powers to be curtailed. Three months later, the Sun came out in support of the Conservative Party. Was this a coincidence, and could politicians of all parties think twice before they start talking about reducing the power of regulators and regulation?