Information between 29th June 2025 - 19th July 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
30 Jun 2025 - UK-Mauritius Agreement on the Chagos Archipelago - View Vote Context Lord Polak voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 162 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 185 Noes - 205 |
|
2 Jul 2025 - House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Polak voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 249 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 280 Noes - 243 |
|
9 Jul 2025 - House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Polak voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 251 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 284 Noes - 239 |
|
9 Jul 2025 - House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Polak voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 246 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 265 Noes - 247 |
|
15 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Polak voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 171 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 282 Noes - 158 |
|
15 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Polak voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 191 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 215 Noes - 240 |
|
15 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Polak voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 188 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 237 Noes - 223 |
|
14 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Polak voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 173 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 267 Noes - 153 |
|
14 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Polak voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 171 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 264 Noes - 158 |
|
16 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Polak voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 61 Conservative Aye votes vs 1 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 124 Noes - 131 |
|
16 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Polak voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 136 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 148 Noes - 155 |
|
16 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Polak voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 135 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 184 Noes - 123 |
|
16 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Polak voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 140 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 202 Noes - 138 |
|
16 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Polak voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 134 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 180 Noes - 123 |
|
16 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Polak voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 197 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 304 Noes - 160 |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Radicalism
Asked by: Lord Polak (Conservative - Life peer) Thursday 3rd July 2025 Question to the Home Office: To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they have taken to consult communities and experts on developing a long-term counter-extremism strategy aimed at building democratic and societal resilience, strengthening cohesion and reducing extremism and other societal threats. Answered by Lord Hanson of Flint - Minister of State (Home Office) The Home Office keeps all polices relating to national security and public safety under regular review, in consultation with a wide range of experts and stakeholders. |
|
Revenue and Customs: Fujitsu
Asked by: Lord Polak (Conservative - Life peer) Thursday 17th July 2025 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask His Majesty's Government which Fujitsu contracts have been extended by HM Revenue and Customs in the past 12 months; and whether ministerial approval was sought. Answered by Lord Livermore - Financial Secretary (HM Treasury) Seven Fujitsu contracts have been extended by HMRC in the past 12 months to ensure continuity of essential services. These are: the Call-Off Contract for COTS Software (Oracle), Crown Hosting Run, Data Services, Data Project Services, Endpoint Detection & Response (EDR) and Vulnerability Managed Service, Pre-Production Environment (PPE) Web Solutions, and the Trader Support Service. As a public contracting authority, HMRC adheres to the procurement rules and spend controls set by the Cabinet Office and HM Treasury, obtaining appropriate ministerial approval where required. Of the seven contracts, six had extension values below the Cabinet Office Spend Control threshold of £20 million and were approved internally by HMRC in line with established processes and governance controls. Only one contract—the Trader Support Service—exceeded the threshold (£66.8 million) and therefore required both Cabinet Office Spend Control and Ministerial Approval.
|