Information between 26th February 2026 - 8th March 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
4 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Pack voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 41 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 52 Noes - 146 |
|
4 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Pack voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 44 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 213 Noes - 145 |
|
5 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Pack voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 42 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 193 Noes - 143 |
|
5 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Pack voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 42 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 198 Noes - 139 |
|
5 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Pack voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 43 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 208 Noes - 142 |
|
5 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Pack voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 42 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 194 Noes - 140 |
|
5 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Pack voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 40 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 214 Noes - 142 |
|
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Pack voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 29 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 202 Noes - 155 |
|
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Pack voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 27 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 192 Noes - 155 |
|
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Pack voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 48 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 1 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 61 Noes - 178 |
|
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Pack voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 49 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 71 Noes - 177 |
|
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Pack voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 47 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 121 Noes - 145 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Lord Pack speeches from: English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill
Lord Pack contributed 4 speeches (1,372 words) Committee stage Thursday 5th March 2026 - Grand Committee Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Government: Communication
Asked by: Lord Pack (Liberal Democrat - Life peer) Tuesday 3rd March 2026 Question to the Cabinet Office: To ask His Majesty's Government, with regard to paragraph 38 of the guidance Using non-corporate communication channels (e.g. WhatsApp, private email, SMS) for government business, published on 30 March 2023, whether they completed the review of that guidance by 31 December 2025; and when they plan to publish any revisions to that guidance. Answered by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) This government has a robust set of security policies and guidance to ensure our information is processed securely, which is kept under constant consideration. As part of this government’s recent commitment to raise information security standards, we plan to examine whether the current codes of conduct and guidance relating to the use of non-corporate communication channels remain effective, given the changing ways in which we use modern technology in government.
|
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill
118 speeches (27,339 words) Committee stage Thursday 5th March 2026 - Grand Committee Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government Mentions: 1: Baroness Taylor of Stevenage (Lab - Life peer) My Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Pack, for Amendment 241A, which would require local authorities - Link to Speech 2: Lord Norton of Louth (Con - Life peer) what I have termed “law but not law” and is covered in Amendment 256 in the name of the noble Lord, Lord Pack - Link to Speech 3: Baroness Scott of Bybrook (Con - Life peer) geographical configuration of these new authorities.Amendment 256 in the name of the noble Lord, Lord Pack - Link to Speech 4: Baroness Taylor of Stevenage (Lab - Life peer) My Lords, I thank the noble Lords, Lord Pack, Lord Norton and Lord Wallace, for their amendments in this - Link to Speech |