Information between 3rd August 2026 - 12th September 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
9 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Pack voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 49 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 196 Noes - 138 |
|
9 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Pack voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 48 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 194 Noes - 138 |
|
9 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Pack voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 54 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 226 Noes - 162 |
|
9 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Pack voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 54 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 248 Noes - 163 |
|
9 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Pack voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 46 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 188 Noes - 125 |
|
7 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Pack voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 54 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 76 Noes - 164 |
|
7 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Pack voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 53 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 247 Noes - 165 |
|
7 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Pack voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 51 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 59 Noes - 144 |
|
7 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Pack voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 52 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 69 Noes - 171 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Lord Pack speeches from: Parcel Delivery Services
Lord Pack contributed 2 speeches (1,296 words) Thursday 3rd September 2026 - Lords Chamber Department for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade |
|
Lord Pack speeches from: Electoral Commission Investigations
Lord Pack contributed 1 speech (112 words) Wednesday 2nd September 2026 - Lords Chamber Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Home Office: X Corp
Asked by: Lord Pack (Liberal Democrat - Life peer) Friday 7th August 2026 Question to the Home Office: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Hanson of Flint on 20 July (HL2218), why the logo on the UK Home Office account on X is in the square format which identifies it as a Premium paid-for account, rather than the round format which is used to identify free verified government accounts, even though the Home Office has stated that is has neither paid for such an account nor received one for free from X. Answered by Lord Hanson of Flint - Minister of State (Home Office) At the time of previous responses, the Home Office Social Media Team understood that it held a standard verified government account and did not subscribe to, or pay for, X Premium. Subsequent checks of the account's billing and subscription history have established that the Home Office does not pay for Premium services, but that the account has been provided with complimentary Premium status by X at no cost to the department because it is a government Department. |
|
Road Works
Asked by: Lord Pack (Liberal Democrat - Life peer) Tuesday 8th September 2026 Question to the Department for Transport: To ask His Majesty's Government what proportion of roadwork permit applications submitted through Street Manager in each of the last five years were for collaborative working involving two or more organisations working at the same site. Answered by Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill - Minister of State (Department for Transport) In Street Manager, permit applications can be marked as involving collaborative working where two or more organisations undertake works at the same site. The proportion of permit applications recorded as collaborative working in each of the last five years was:
|
|
Cabinet Office: X Corp
Asked by: Lord Pack (Liberal Democrat - Life peer) Tuesday 8th September 2026 Question to the Cabinet Office: To ask His Majesty's Government how many X Premium accounts the Cabinet Office has (1) paid for, or (2) been granted for free by X, in the past year; and whether they intend to renew them. Answered by Baroness Twycross - Parliamentary Secretary (Cabinet Office) Please refer to the answer given to HL1356 and HL1357. Decisions regarding subscriptions and the use of platform features are taken by individual teams within departments, and are not centrally managed.
|
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
3 Sep 2026, 2:19 p.m. - House of Lords ">> Question for short debate the quality and reliability of parcel delivery services. Lord Pack. " Baroness Morgan of Huyton (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
3 Sep 2026, 2:27 p.m. - House of Lords ">> I would like to start by thanking the noble Lord Lord Pack for securing this debate today. And " Lord Pack (Liberal Democrat) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
3 Sep 2026, 2:31 p.m. - House of Lords "regulator enforcement powers and improvement plans. As Lord Pack " Lord Mott (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
3 Sep 2026, 2:38 p.m. - House of Lords "Lord Pack. >> For securing. >> This important debate. >> And I look forward with great " Lord Redwood (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
3 Sep 2026, 2:42 p.m. - House of Lords "noble Lord Lord Pack for ensuring that we debate the whole question " Lord Hunt of Wirral (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
3 Sep 2026, 2:42 p.m. - House of Lords "service. As the noble Lord Lord Pack said, it's a vital lifeline " Lord Hunt of Wirral (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
2 Sep 2026, 6:24 p.m. - House of Lords "regulation. As my noble friend Lord Pack had indicated, just a " Lord Purvis of Tweed (Liberal Democrat) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Government Political Priorities and Legislative Agenda
61 speeches (21,087 words) Thursday 3rd September 2026 - Lords Chamber Northern Ireland Office Mentions: 1: Lord Purvis of Tweed (LD - Life peer) But, as my noble friend Lord Pack said yesterday and today, we have not yet seen that the Government - Link to Speech |
|
Parcel Delivery Services
17 speeches (6,040 words) Thursday 3rd September 2026 - Lords Chamber Department for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade Mentions: 1: Lord Mott (Con - Life peer) My Lords, I start by thanking the noble Lord, Lord Pack, for securing this debate. - Link to Speech 2: Earl of Effingham (Con - Life peer) My Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Pack, for securing this important debate and I look forward with - Link to Speech 3: Lord Hunt of Wirral (Con - Life peer) I wish the noble Lord well in his role.I thank the noble Lord, Lord Pack, for this great opportunity - Link to Speech |
|
Direction of Government
56 speeches (9,899 words) Wednesday 2nd September 2026 - Lords Chamber Leader of the House Mentions: 1: Lord Purvis of Tweed (LD - Life peer) political system on donations, on clarity, on transparency and on regulation, as my noble friend Lord Pack - Link to Speech |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Tuesday 27th October 2026 3:45 p.m. Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |