To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Written Question
Convictions: Appeals
Wednesday 25th September 2024

Asked by: Lord Northbrook (Conservative - Excepted Hereditary)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask His Majesty's Government how many cases submitted to the Criminal Cases Review Commission have remained pending and incomplete in each of the previous five calendar years, respectively.

Answered by Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede - Lord in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

On 1 September 2024, the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) had 1,088 cases open, of those, 921 were under review (including triage), 167 were waiting to be allocated to a case review manager.

The table below provides the data for 2024 and the previous five calendar years:

Year

Applications Closed

Referrals

2019

1,539

22

2020

1,063

76

2021

1,216

21

2022

1,174

33

2023

1,487

20

1 January 2024 to 1 September 2024

969

19

The number of open cases as of 31 December of each year is below:

Year

Open cases as of 31 December

2019

700 (530 under review, 170 waiting)

2020

725 (600 under review, 125 waiting)

2021

755 (646 under review, 109 waiting)

2022

890 (763 under review, 127 waiting)

2023

1,010 (855 under review, 155 waiting)

The number of cases completed by the CCRC in each financial year is reported in their Annual Reports, which can be found on their website.


Written Question
Convictions: Appeals
Wednesday 25th September 2024

Asked by: Lord Northbrook (Conservative - Excepted Hereditary)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask His Majesty's Government how many cases submitted to the Criminal Cases Review Commission have been concluded and reported on in (1) 2024 and (2) each of the previous five calendar years.

Answered by Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede - Lord in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

On 1 September 2024, the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) had 1,088 cases open, of those, 921 were under review (including triage), 167 were waiting to be allocated to a case review manager.

The table below provides the data for 2024 and the previous five calendar years:

Year

Applications Closed

Referrals

2019

1,539

22

2020

1,063

76

2021

1,216

21

2022

1,174

33

2023

1,487

20

1 January 2024 to 1 September 2024

969

19

The number of open cases as of 31 December of each year is below:

Year

Open cases as of 31 December

2019

700 (530 under review, 170 waiting)

2020

725 (600 under review, 125 waiting)

2021

755 (646 under review, 109 waiting)

2022

890 (763 under review, 127 waiting)

2023

1,010 (855 under review, 155 waiting)

The number of cases completed by the CCRC in each financial year is reported in their Annual Reports, which can be found on their website.


Written Question
Convictions: Appeals
Wednesday 25th September 2024

Asked by: Lord Northbrook (Conservative - Excepted Hereditary)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask His Majesty's Government how many cases submitted to the Criminal Cases Review Commission were outstanding on 1 September 2024.

Answered by Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede - Lord in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

On 1 September 2024, the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) had 1,088 cases open, of those, 921 were under review (including triage), 167 were waiting to be allocated to a case review manager.

The table below provides the data for 2024 and the previous five calendar years:

Year

Applications Closed

Referrals

2019

1,539

22

2020

1,063

76

2021

1,216

21

2022

1,174

33

2023

1,487

20

1 January 2024 to 1 September 2024

969

19

The number of open cases as of 31 December of each year is below:

Year

Open cases as of 31 December

2019

700 (530 under review, 170 waiting)

2020

725 (600 under review, 125 waiting)

2021

755 (646 under review, 109 waiting)

2022

890 (763 under review, 127 waiting)

2023

1,010 (855 under review, 155 waiting)

The number of cases completed by the CCRC in each financial year is reported in their Annual Reports, which can be found on their website.


Written Question
Criminal Cases Review Commission
Thursday 23rd May 2024

Asked by: Lord Northbrook (Conservative - Excepted Hereditary)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask His Majesty's Government in each of the last five years (1) how many applications have been made to the Criminal Cases Review Commission, (2) in how many cases a review has been completed and a decision been made and, (3) what is the average length of time that the Commission has taken to examine and complete a review.

Answered by Lord Bellamy

Information on the number of cases received and completed, and the average duration of a review, is available on the Criminal Cases Review Commission’s (CCRC) website and in their annual report. The table below provides data for the last five complete business years:

Applications Received

Cases Completed

Average Duration of a Review (from allocation to initial decision)

2019-20

1334

1453

31.7 weeks

2020-21

1142

1109

35.1 weeks

2021-22

1198

1183

34.4 weeks

2022-23

1424

1275

38.7 weeks

2023-24

1629

1441

35.1 weeks

The average number of Case Review Managers over the past five years is as follows:

Year ending 31 March

Case Review Manager Average Headcount

2019 – 2020

30

2020 – 2021

30

2021 – 2022

29

2022 – 2023

29

2023 - 2024

31

Section three of the CCRC’s published Case Review Process policy (CW-POL-04-Case-Review-Process-v3.0.pdf (cloud-platform-e218f50a4812967ba1215eaecede923f.s3.amazonaws.com)) outlines that cases are generally allocated in date order of receipt. However, there are several exceptional factors which determine the degree of priority once a case is under review. These assessments are fluid and relative to the needs of other cases. There are several factors for a case to be given higher priority, these include old age (75 years or older) and/or ill health, supported by medical evidence, where there is concern that the applicant may die before the case is dealt with. In addition, evidence that the applicant’s serious ill health (or that of any close family member of the applicant) is directly and significantly aggravated by any delay will also result in the case being given higher priority. The full list of factors for a case to be given a higher priority can be found in the Case Review Process policy.


Written Question
Criminal Cases Review Commission
Thursday 23rd May 2024

Asked by: Lord Northbrook (Conservative - Excepted Hereditary)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask His Majesty's Government what procedure, if any, exists within the Criminal Cases Review Commission for ensuring priority is given to those cases where an applicant has a limited life expectancy, due to age or infirmity.

Answered by Lord Bellamy

Information on the number of cases received and completed, and the average duration of a review, is available on the Criminal Cases Review Commission’s (CCRC) website and in their annual report. The table below provides data for the last five complete business years:

Applications Received

Cases Completed

Average Duration of a Review (from allocation to initial decision)

2019-20

1334

1453

31.7 weeks

2020-21

1142

1109

35.1 weeks

2021-22

1198

1183

34.4 weeks

2022-23

1424

1275

38.7 weeks

2023-24

1629

1441

35.1 weeks

The average number of Case Review Managers over the past five years is as follows:

Year ending 31 March

Case Review Manager Average Headcount

2019 – 2020

30

2020 – 2021

30

2021 – 2022

29

2022 – 2023

29

2023 - 2024

31

Section three of the CCRC’s published Case Review Process policy (CW-POL-04-Case-Review-Process-v3.0.pdf (cloud-platform-e218f50a4812967ba1215eaecede923f.s3.amazonaws.com)) outlines that cases are generally allocated in date order of receipt. However, there are several exceptional factors which determine the degree of priority once a case is under review. These assessments are fluid and relative to the needs of other cases. There are several factors for a case to be given higher priority, these include old age (75 years or older) and/or ill health, supported by medical evidence, where there is concern that the applicant may die before the case is dealt with. In addition, evidence that the applicant’s serious ill health (or that of any close family member of the applicant) is directly and significantly aggravated by any delay will also result in the case being given higher priority. The full list of factors for a case to be given a higher priority can be found in the Case Review Process policy.


Written Question
Criminal Cases Review Commission
Thursday 23rd May 2024

Asked by: Lord Northbrook (Conservative - Excepted Hereditary)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask His Majesty's Government how many case review managers have been employed by the Criminal Cases Review Commission during each of the past five years.

Answered by Lord Bellamy

Information on the number of cases received and completed, and the average duration of a review, is available on the Criminal Cases Review Commission’s (CCRC) website and in their annual report. The table below provides data for the last five complete business years:

Applications Received

Cases Completed

Average Duration of a Review (from allocation to initial decision)

2019-20

1334

1453

31.7 weeks

2020-21

1142

1109

35.1 weeks

2021-22

1198

1183

34.4 weeks

2022-23

1424

1275

38.7 weeks

2023-24

1629

1441

35.1 weeks

The average number of Case Review Managers over the past five years is as follows:

Year ending 31 March

Case Review Manager Average Headcount

2019 – 2020

30

2020 – 2021

30

2021 – 2022

29

2022 – 2023

29

2023 - 2024

31

Section three of the CCRC’s published Case Review Process policy (CW-POL-04-Case-Review-Process-v3.0.pdf (cloud-platform-e218f50a4812967ba1215eaecede923f.s3.amazonaws.com)) outlines that cases are generally allocated in date order of receipt. However, there are several exceptional factors which determine the degree of priority once a case is under review. These assessments are fluid and relative to the needs of other cases. There are several factors for a case to be given higher priority, these include old age (75 years or older) and/or ill health, supported by medical evidence, where there is concern that the applicant may die before the case is dealt with. In addition, evidence that the applicant’s serious ill health (or that of any close family member of the applicant) is directly and significantly aggravated by any delay will also result in the case being given higher priority. The full list of factors for a case to be given a higher priority can be found in the Case Review Process policy.


Written Question
Cyprus: Military Bases
Tuesday 8th May 2018

Asked by: Lord Northbrook (Conservative - Excepted Hereditary)

Question to the Ministry of Defence:

To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they intend to use current pension rights as a baseline for the new arrangements following the privatisation of the Sovereign Base Area's Defence Fire Risk Management Organisation, or to apply the provisions of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations to the Sovereign Base Area as they apply in the UK.

Answered by Earl Howe - Shadow Deputy Leader of the House of Lords

The Defence Fire Risk Management Organisation (DFRMO) is not being privatised. Elements of the Defence Fire and Rescue capability are already delivered by contractors at a number of Defence's fire stations. The Defence Fire and Rescue Project is examining the provision of this capability worldwide to assess whether there are alternative ways to deliver the capability at improved value for money, including the extension of contractor involvement, whilst ensuring continued protection of key military activities. The process is currently at the stage where final approvals to award a contract are being sought.

Details of the Bidders' proposals for Cyprus are commercially sensitive but all employees' rights and employer responsibilities, including pension provision for the DFRMO Locally Employed Civilians in Cyprus, have been considered throughout the competition. Members of the Defence Fire and Rescue Service and their trade union representatives have been consulted at all stages of the project.


Written Question
Cyprus: Military Bases
Tuesday 8th May 2018

Asked by: Lord Northbrook (Conservative - Excepted Hereditary)

Question to the Ministry of Defence:

To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the impact on the pension rights of those employed at the Sovereign Base Area's Defence Fire Risk Management Organisation of the proposed privatisation of that organisation; and whether there are any precedents for the proposed privatisation.

Answered by Earl Howe - Shadow Deputy Leader of the House of Lords

The Defence Fire Risk Management Organisation (DFRMO) is not being privatised. Elements of the Defence Fire and Rescue capability are already delivered by contractors at a number of Defence's fire stations. The Defence Fire and Rescue Project is examining the provision of this capability worldwide to assess whether there are alternative ways to deliver the capability at improved value for money, including the extension of contractor involvement, whilst ensuring continued protection of key military activities. The process is currently at the stage where final approvals to award a contract are being sought.

Details of the Bidders' proposals for Cyprus are commercially sensitive but all employees' rights and employer responsibilities, including pension provision for the DFRMO Locally Employed Civilians in Cyprus, have been considered throughout the competition. Members of the Defence Fire and Rescue Service and their trade union representatives have been consulted at all stages of the project.


Written Question
Air Traffic Control
Tuesday 24th April 2018

Asked by: Lord Northbrook (Conservative - Excepted Hereditary)

Question to the Department for Transport:

To ask Her Majesty's Government what is the process for downgrading airspace from controlled to uncontrolled.

Answered by Baroness Sugg

The independent Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) is responsible for overseeing the design of UK airspace.

The process to request the CAA to approve a proposal for an airspace change is set out in its relevant guidance document, CAP 1616, which came into effect on 2nd January 2018.


Written Question
Oman: Foreign Relations
Thursday 29th March 2018

Asked by: Lord Northbrook (Conservative - Excepted Hereditary)

Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office:

To ask Her Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to increase domestic and foreign policy cooperation between the UK and the Sultanate of Oman.

Answered by Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon

The UK and Oman enjoy a broad and exceptionally close relationship. Oman is a longstanding friend and ally in the Gulf, with shared interests across diplomatic, economic , defence and security matters. We are working more closely than ever across a number of fields including on economic, defence and counter-terrorism matters. Later this year, Exercise Saif Sareea 3 will take place in Oman – the largest UK-Omani military exercise for 16 years. Oman is also an important partner in regional affairs. My Rt Hon. Friend the Foreign Secretary (the Member for Uxbridge and South Ruislip, Mr Johnson) has visited Oman twice in the last four months to underline our commitment to the bilateral relationship and to take forward our regional cooperation.