Information between 3rd September 2026 - 23rd October 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Thursday 22nd October 2026 Lord Nagaraju (Labour - Life peer) Oral questions - Main Chamber Subject: Procedural flexibility in the House of Lords when developments occur after a Written Question, Oral Question or debate has been tabled View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
3 Sep 2026 - Nature Restoration Levy Regulations 2026 - View Vote Context Lord Nagaraju voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 26 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 41 Noes - 29 |
|
9 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Nagaraju voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 131 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 196 Noes - 138 |
|
9 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Nagaraju voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 127 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 194 Noes - 138 |
|
9 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Nagaraju voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 142 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 226 Noes - 162 |
|
9 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Nagaraju voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 150 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 248 Noes - 163 |
|
9 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Nagaraju voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 120 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 188 Noes - 125 |
|
7 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Nagaraju voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 144 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 76 Noes - 164 |
|
7 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Nagaraju voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 149 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 247 Noes - 165 |
|
7 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Nagaraju voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 115 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 26 Noes - 119 |
|
7 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Nagaraju voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 151 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 69 Noes - 171 |
|
7 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Nagaraju voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 133 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 59 Noes - 144 |
|
8 Sep 2026 - Plant Health, Seeds, Seed Potatoes and Plant Propagating Material (Amendment) (Northern Ireland) Regulations 2026 - View Vote Context Lord Nagaraju voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 58 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 26 Noes - 63 |
|
14 Oct 2026 - ACAS Code of Practice on Time Off for Trade Union Duties and Activities - View Vote Context Lord Nagaraju voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 66 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 56 Noes - 82 |
|
20 Oct 2026 - Armed Forces Bill - View Vote Context Lord Nagaraju voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 137 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 67 Noes - 168 |
|
20 Oct 2026 - Armed Forces Bill - View Vote Context Lord Nagaraju voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 160 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 259 Noes - 173 |
|
20 Oct 2026 - Armed Forces Bill - View Vote Context Lord Nagaraju voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 157 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 243 Noes - 168 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Lord Nagaraju speeches from: Skills, Vocational Training, and Further and Higher Education
Lord Nagaraju contributed 1 speech (436 words) Thursday 3rd September 2026 - Lords Chamber Department for International Development |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
House of Lords: Security
Asked by: Lord Nagaraju (Labour - Life peer) Tuesday 15th September 2026 Question To ask The Senior Deputy Speaker what assessment has been made of the security, privacy and confidentiality implications of camera-, microphone- and AI-enabled smart glasses in areas of the Parliamentary Estate for which the House of Lords Administration is responsible; whether their use is currently permitted in the Chamber, division lobbies, committee rooms and other sensitive areas; and whether specific restrictions or guidance will be introduced. Answered by Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede New guidance on filming and photography in the House of Lords has recently been published and was communicated to Members this month. This guidance covers camera, microphone and AI-enabled smart glasses as well as other technologies. Recording is not permitted without appropriate authorisation. In addition, a specific review of Parliament’s policy on the use of camera, microphone and AI-enabled smart glasses on the Parliamentary Estate is currently underway. The review is considering the implications of these emerging technologies and whether additional guidance is required. This work will bring together expertise from those responsible for filming and photography policy, physical and information security, privacy and data protection compliance and accessibility and reasonable-adjustment requirements, ensuring that any future approach appropriately balances security, privacy, operational needs and accessibility considerations. This review will engage with the Member governance bodies of both Houses as appropriate. |
|
AI Security Institute: Anthropic
Asked by: Lord Nagaraju (Labour - Life peer) Monday 12th October 2026 Question to the Cabinet Office: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of Anthropic’s decision not to provide its Claude Mythos 5.1 model to the UK AI Security Institute for pre-release testing; whether the Institute has subsequently been provided with access to that model; and what steps they are taking to ensure that the Institute has timely access to frontier AI models for independent safety evaluation. Answered by Baroness Twycross - Parliamentary Secretary (Cabinet Office) AISI maintains strong relationships with all frontier AI developers, that whilst voluntary, are bound by memoranda of understanding, and continues to test the world’s most capable models prior to their deployment. Only this month, we tested OpenAI’s most powerful model, GPT-6 Astra, before it was released to the public. AISI has tested dozens of models from leading AI companies, including OpenAI, Google DeepMind and Anthropic. |
|
Artificial Intelligence: Parliamentary Scrutiny
Asked by: Lord Nagaraju (Labour - Life peer) Wednesday 14th October 2026 Question To ask The Senior Deputy Speaker what consideration the Procedure and Privileges Committee has given to whether the House procedures are sufficiently responsive to the speed at which artificial intelligence is developing; and whether the Procedure and Privileges Committee intends to consider piloting a regular dedicated topical question or other recurring scrutiny opportunity on artificial intelligence. Answered by Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede Existing procedures already provide flexibility for Noble Lords to scrutinise fast-moving issues, including by means of topical oral questions, Private Notice Questions, and Questions for Written Answer. The Government also makes regular statements, and Urgent Questions asked in the House of Commons may be repeated. The Procedure and Privileges Committee has no plans to pilot a regular dedicated topical question or other recurring scrutiny opportunity focused on artificial intelligence, but the Committee is always open to considering proposals from Noble Lords to refine and improve the House's procedures. |
|
Artificial Intelligence: Safety
Asked by: Lord Nagaraju (Labour - Life peer) Monday 19th October 2026 Question to the Ministry of Defence: To ask His Majesty's Government how standards for artificial intelligence safety, assurance and interoperability developed through the United Kingdom–United States AI and Autonomy partnership will relate to their work on global artificial intelligence principles and standards. Answered by Lord Coaker - Minister of State (Ministry of Defence) Building on our existing UK-US defence cooperation, this partnership will focus on AI and autonomy collaboration, to help protect critical national infrastructure, from sea lanes to airspace. It will accelerate the delivery of trusted, interoperable capabilities that strengthen deterrence and maintain both nations' technological edge.
The UK is demonstrating leadership in the efficient, responsible and safe deployment of AI.
|
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
3 Sep 2026, 2:16 p.m. - House of Lords "My noble friend Lord Nagaraju quite rightly talked about the need for reskilling and the emphasis on AI, " Baroness Smith of Malvern, The Minister of State, Department for Work and Pensions (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
22 Oct 2026, 3 p.m. - House of Lords "the noble Lord, Lord Lord Nagaraju Lord Nagaraju earlier this. Excuse " Baroness Lloyd of Effra, Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport) (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
22 Oct 2026, 2:38 p.m. - House of Lords "and the noble Lord Lord Nagaraju set some of those out, targeting harmful features rather than " Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
22 Oct 2026, 11:20 a.m. - House of Lords ">> First Oral Question Lord Nagaraju. >> My Lords, I beg leave to ask the " Introduction(s): Lord Petterson and Baroness Garnham - View Video - View Transcript |
|
22 Oct 2026, 11:26 a.m. - House of Lords " Noble Lord Nagaraju. >> Noble Lord Nagaraju. >> Question talked about procedural flexibility. And of course, the House is using one of those shortly, " Lord Harper (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
22 Oct 2026, 11:24 a.m. - House of Lords " Yes, I that's an easy proposition to agree with. In fact, proposition to agree with. In fact, I would say the noble Lord, Lord Lord Nagaraju, brings his own " Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede (Non-affiliated) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Skills, Vocational Training, and Further and Higher Education
62 speeches (19,532 words) Thursday 3rd September 2026 - Lords Chamber Department for International Development Mentions: 1: Baroness Smith of Malvern (Lab - Life peer) My noble friend Lord Nagaraju, quite rightly, talked about the need for reskilling and the emphasis on - Link to Speech |