Information between 6th November 2025 - 26th November 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Mott voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 179 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 193 Noes - 236 |
|
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Mott voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 181 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 201 Noes - 238 |
|
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Mott voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 185 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 207 Noes - 240 |
|
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Mott voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 198 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 298 Noes - 157 |
|
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Mott voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 199 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 309 Noes - 150 |
|
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Mott voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 195 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 302 Noes - 135 |
|
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Mott voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 193 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 296 Noes - 147 |
|
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Mott voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 198 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 295 Noes - 150 |
|
24 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Mott voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 184 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 200 Noes - 244 |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Life Sciences: Investment
Asked by: Lord Mott (Conservative - Life peer) Friday 7th November 2025 Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology: To ask His Majesty's Government what is the total value of known life-sciences investments in the UK that have been cancelled or paused since 4 July 2024. Answered by Lord Vallance of Balham - Minister of State (Department for Energy Security and Net Zero) Through delivery of the Life Sciences Sector Plan, and the wider Industrial Strategy, this Government is taking targeted action to address the global challenges that life sciences companies face and unlock economic growth. Challenges include global competition and global commercial uncertainty. Our ambition is that the UK will be the leading Life Sciences economy in Europe by 2030 and the third most important globally, behind the US and China only, by 2035. We have already started delivering on key actions, investing up to £600 million in the Health Data Research Service alongside Wellcome, committing over £650 million in Genomics England and up to £354 million in Our Future Health, and launching the £50 million Life Sciences Transformational R&D Investment Fund pilot. Alongside these commitments, we have continued to see transformative investments into the UK made by Life Sciences companies. For example: in May 2025, BioNTech committed up to £1 billion as part of a ten-year investment on top of their existing strategic partnership with the Government; in August, Eli Lilly invested £35 million in the Obesity Pathway Innovation Programme; and in October, Convatec announced plans to invest £500 million in a new R&D facility in Manchester. |
|
Doctors: Strikes
Asked by: Lord Mott (Conservative - Life peer) Friday 21st November 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask His Majesty's Government what estimate they have made of the cost to the NHS of the resident doctors' strike between 25–30 July, including cover for absent staff, disruption and catch-up work. Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) The five-day resident doctor strike in July 2025 had an estimated cost to the National Health Service of around £240 million and this is a starting estimate for the planned November strike. The costs were lower than in July 2024 as a result of lower turnout. We continue to update estimates as new data becomes available, in line with receiving business as usual financial data from NHS systems.
The NHS has tried and tested plans in place to minimise disruption and will work with partners to ensure safe care for patients continues to be available and emergency services continue to operate. |
|
NHS England
Asked by: Lord Mott (Conservative - Life peer) Friday 21st November 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask His Majesty's Government by what date they expect the abolition of NHS England to be completed. Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) We will deliver on the planned timetable of bringing NHS England back into the Department within two years, a move that will put an end to the duplication of two organisations doing the same job. The abolition of NHS England requires primary legislation, and as such is subject to the will of Parliament. We are working with the Leader of the House and business managers to ensure an appropriate timetable that enables us to work towards the two-year delivery timetable already announced. |
|
Drugs: Shortages
Asked by: Lord Mott (Conservative - Life peer) Tuesday 25th November 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to prevent manufacturing issues causing medicines shortages and to mitigate their impact. Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) There are over 14,000 medicines and the majority are in good supply. While we can’t always prevent supply issues from occurring, we have a range of well-established processes and tools to manage them when they arise, to mitigate risks to patients. These include close and regular engagement with suppliers, use of alternative strengths or forms of a medicine to allow patients to remain on the same product, expediting regulatory procedures, sourcing unlicensed imports from abroad, adding products to the restricted exports and hoarding list, use of Serious Shortage Protocols, and issuing National Health Service communications to provide management advice and information on the issue to healthcare professionals including pharmacists, so they can advise and support their patients. Further information can be found in A guide to the systems and processes for managing medicines supply issues in England’. The resilience of United Kingdom supply chains is a key priority, and we are continually learning and seeking to improve the way we work to both manage and help prevent supply issues and avoid shortages. The Department, working closely with NHS England, is taking forward a range of actions to improve our ability to mitigate and manage shortages and strengthen our resilience. These actions were set out in a policy paper published in August 2025, Managing a robust and resilient supply of medicines. As part of that work, we continue to engage with industry, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, and other colleagues across the supply chain as we progress work to co-design and deliver solutions. However, medicine shortages are a complex and global issue and everyone in the supply chain has a role to play in addressing them, and therefore continued action requires a collaborative approach. |
|
Drugs: Shortages
Asked by: Lord Mott (Conservative - Life peer) Tuesday 25th November 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask His Majesty's Government how many fines they have issued in the past year for failure to report medicines shortages. Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) Suppliers are legally responsible for reporting disruptions and discontinuations through the Health Service Products (Provision and Disclosure of Information) Regulations 2018 (the ‘Information Regulations’), this includes a provision that allows the Department to fine a company if they fail to report. To date the Department has not issued any fines. Reporting of potential supply issues is critical, enabling the Department to complete a thorough risk assessment of the severity of the issue. Alongside legal requirements, the Department also has an online reporting tool, known as the Discontinuations and Shortages portal, launched in October 2020, which suppliers can use to notify the Department. When reporting issues are identified we work with companies to understand how we can help enable them to inform the Department of any future supply issues. While the majority of suppliers report disruption in a timely manner, not all do so, and this can impede our ability to mitigate patient risk. As part of our obligations under the ‘Information Regulations’, we regularly review and consider the need to amend provisions. We plan to consult on how to ensure we receive sufficient information to put in place effective mitigations for supply issues, and we will also be reviewing the penalties for not complying with legal reporting requirements to ensure that these support the timely reporting of supply issues. |
|
Glioblastoma: Immunotherapy
Asked by: Lord Mott (Conservative - Life peer) Tuesday 25th November 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask His Majesty's Government when they expect the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency to complete its assessment of DCVax-L. Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) The Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) is an executive agency of the Department and regulates medicine, medical devices, and blood components for transfusion in the United Kingdom, with responsibility for ensuring that medicines meet appropriate standards of safety, quality, and efficacy. Northwest Biotherapeutics has submitted a Marketing Authorization Application to the MHRA for DCVax®-L, an immunotherapy for glioblastoma. The MHRA is unable to comment on applications during the process of review, but the MHRA can confirm that this application is not affected by any historical backlogs, and the agency is assessing all applications rapidly for safety, quality, and efficacy. |
|
Cancer: Vaccination
Asked by: Lord Mott (Conservative - Life peer) Tuesday 25th November 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask His Majesty's Government what progress they are making in speeding up the approval and rollout of personalised cancer vaccines. Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency has completed a public consultation on its draft guideline on individualised mRNA cancer immunotherapies, a new type of personalised cancer treatment. These technologies use cutting-edge science such as artificial intelligence to design a medicine tailored to each patient’s unique tumour profile. We received positive responses from across the life sciences community, the National Health Service, patient groups, academics, and international regulators. Feedback recognised the United Kingdom’s leadership in this area, while calling for greater clarity in some aspects of the guideline. In response, we will refine the guideline to ensure regulatory expectations are clearly articulated, without hampering innovation. This will facilitate faster access to these promising new therapies, while upholding our standards of safety, quality, and efficacy. The final version of the guideline will be published in the coming months, with future updates anticipated as regulatory experience evolves in this rapidly developing field. |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
13 Nov 2025, 5:53 p.m. - House of Lords ">> Lord Mott. It's a it's a pleasure to follow the noble Lord, Lord Bilimoria and I declare my farming and land management " Lord Bilimoria (Crossbench) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
13 Nov 2025, 5:53 p.m. - House of Lords "Nature is our most precious asset. >> Lord Mott. It's a it's a " Lord Bilimoria (Crossbench) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Tobacco and Vapes Bill
90 speeches (22,061 words) Committee stage Thursday 13th November 2025 - Grand Committee Department of Health and Social Care Mentions: 1: Lord Udny-Lister (Con - Life peer) My Lords, my noble friend Lord Mott is unfortunately ill, so with the permission of the Committee I shall - Link to Speech 2: Lord Moylan (Con - Life peer) the argument made so eloquently by my noble friend Lord Udny-Lister on behalf of my noble friend Lord Mott - Link to Speech 3: Earl Russell (LD - Excepted Hereditary) Government to think again on it.Turning briefly to the other amendments, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Mott - Link to Speech 4: Earl Howe (Con - Excepted Hereditary) My Lords, I need to start with some apologies to my noble friends Lord Mott and Lord Udny-Lister because - Link to Speech 5: Baroness Merron (Lab - Life peer) thank all noble Lords for their contributions to the debate.I am sorry to hear that the noble Lord, Lord Mott - Link to Speech |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Wednesday 12th November 2025
Oral Evidence - Association of British Pharmaceuticals Industry, Medicines UK, and Bioindustry Association Medicines security - Public Services Committee Found: Morris of Yardley (The Chair); Lord Blencathra; Lord Carter of Coles; Baroness Cass; Lord Laming; Lord Mott |
|
Wednesday 12th November 2025
Oral Evidence - Orion Pharma (UK), Moderna, and Besins Healthcare UK Limited Medicines security - Public Services Committee Found: The Chair); Lord Blencathra; Lord Carter of Coles; Baroness Cass; Baroness Coffey; Lord Laming; Lord Mott |
|
Wednesday 5th November 2025
Oral Evidence - NHS England, Royal Pharmaceutical Society (RPS), and Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust Medicines security - Public Services Committee Found: (The Chair); Lord Blencathra; Lord Bradley; Lord Carter of Coles; Baroness Coffey; Lord Laming; Lord Mott |
|
Wednesday 5th November 2025
Oral Evidence - Company Chemists' Association (CCA), Healthcare Distribution Association (HDA), and Community Pharmacy England Medicines security - Public Services Committee Found: (The Chair); Lord Blencathra; Lord Bradley; Lord Carter of Coles; Baroness Coffey; Lord Laming; Lord Mott |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Wednesday 26th November 2025 11 a.m. Public Services Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 10th December 2025 11 a.m. Public Services Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Medicines security View calendar - Add to calendar |