Information between 27th October 2025 - 26th November 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
28 Oct 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Mendoza voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 189 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 301 Noes - 153 |
|
28 Oct 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Mendoza voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 174 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 267 Noes - 153 |
|
28 Oct 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Mendoza voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 190 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 302 Noes - 159 |
|
27 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lord Mendoza voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 144 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 243 Noes - 157 |
|
3 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Mendoza voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 164 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 182 Noes - 227 |
|
3 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lord Mendoza voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 144 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 162 Noes - 178 |
|
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Mendoza voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 179 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 193 Noes - 236 |
|
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Mendoza voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 181 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 201 Noes - 238 |
|
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Mendoza voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 185 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 207 Noes - 240 |
|
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Mendoza voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 198 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 295 Noes - 150 |
|
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Mendoza voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 198 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 298 Noes - 157 |
|
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Mendoza voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 199 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 309 Noes - 150 |
|
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Mendoza voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 195 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 302 Noes - 135 |
|
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Mendoza voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 193 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 296 Noes - 147 |
|
24 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Mendoza voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 184 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 200 Noes - 244 |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Naloxone: Training
Asked by: Lord Mendoza (Conservative - Life peer) Monday 27th October 2025 Question to the Home Office: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the cost to police forces of training and equipping officers to carry naloxone, and whether doing so diverts resources from other operations. Answered by Lord Hanson of Flint - Minister of State (Home Office) Naloxone is an important lifesaving medicine to respond to suspected opioid overdoses, when used alongside other first aid measures. In May 2025, the Minister for Crime and Policing wrote to Chief Constables in England and Wales to highlight the findings of a Home Office commissioned independent evaluation into police administration of naloxone and reiterate Government support for all police forces to roll-out the voluntary provision of naloxone to operational officers. The Government expects individual police Chiefs’ to allocate resources appropriately with regard to the local area and need. The majority of police forces in England and Wales have received naloxone supplies and training from their local authority or its commissioned drug and alcohol treatment service. Some forces have funded naloxone projects from their own budgets, through their Police and Crime Commissioner’s Office, or, for forces in Wales, through the Welsh Government. |