Debates between Lord McLoughlin and Tracey Crouch during the 2010-2015 Parliament

Wed 5th Sep 2012

Rail Franchising

Debate between Lord McLoughlin and Tracey Crouch
Tuesday 26th March 2013

(11 years, 8 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord McLoughlin Portrait Mr McLoughlin
- Hansard - -

I can assure the hon. Lady that there will be investment during those periods. In anything where I negotiate directly in awarding contracts, I look at the way services can be improved, and I hope to be able to make a statement shortly on some of those particular services.

Tracey Crouch Portrait Tracey Crouch (Chatham and Aylesford) (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The Secretary of State will be aware that Southeastern is consistently one of the worst performing and most expensive train operating companies in the country. Can he therefore explain why it has been given the longest extension—50 months? Can he assure my constituents that the extension is not a reward for failure? What opportunity will passengers have to engage in the process of direct awards as it is finalised?

Lord McLoughlin Portrait Mr McLoughlin
- Hansard - -

None of these direct awards will be made without getting the maximum we can out of the companies, talking to them and getting improvements in services. Where there have been let-downs, I will certainly want the companies concerned to address those problems.

Rail Fares

Debate between Lord McLoughlin and Tracey Crouch
Wednesday 5th September 2012

(12 years, 2 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord McLoughlin Portrait Mr McLoughlin
- Hansard - -

I look forward to working closely with my hon. Friend and to discussing that issue with him.

Tracey Crouch Portrait Tracey Crouch (Chatham and Aylesford) (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am sure that I shall like my right hon. Friend better in his new role than in his last.

The shadow Secretary of State was kind enough to quote accurately comments that I made to my local newspaper reflecting my constituents’ concern about rail fare increases. I said that I would continue to make representations on the matter. Rather than succumbing to the political opportunism displayed by the Opposition, who imposed RPI plus 3% uniquely on Southeastern commuters, will my right hon. Friend meet me, and fellow Kent Members, to engage in a substantive conversation about rail fares and services for our constituents?

Lord McLoughlin Portrait Mr McLoughlin
- Hansard - -

I should be delighted to meet my hon. Friend and the colleagues whom she wishes to bring to see me. As I have said, a huge number of people rely on commuting, particularly in areas such as Kent, and that is very expensive for them. I shall be more than happy to arrange a meeting in the not-too-distant future.