Asked by: Lord McColl of Dulwich (Conservative - Life peer)
Question to the Home Office:
To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Murray of Blidworth on 6 February (HL4984), when they will publish the guidance on providing 12 months' support to modern slavery victims who hold a positive conclusive grounds decision.
Answered by Lord Sharpe of Epsom - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Home Office)
We carefully reviewed the commitment made regarding the provision of 12 months’ support to modern slavery victims with a positive Conclusive Grounds decision and concluded that the Recovery Needs Assessment ensures that necessary support is available to victims with a positive Conclusive Grounds decision for the necessary length of time, including if this is 12 months, or longer. There is therefore no need to specify 12-month support for all individuals in guidance and no current plans to do so.
A total of 10,704 consenting adults in England and Wales received support through the Modern Slavery Victim Care contract during the year ending June 2023, the largest number support for any year since the contract began, and the Government remains committed to supporting victims based on need.
Through Section 65 of the Nationality and Borders Act 2022, the Government also set out, for the first time in primary legislation, that confirmed victims of modern slavery are eligible for temporary permission to stay in the UK. Depending on the individual circumstances, Temporary Permission to Stay can be granted for 12 months, or more, to confirmed victims of Modern Slavery. This delivers a fair and effective permission to stay process in relation to confirmed victims of modern slavery, allowing those who are cooperating with public authorities in the investigation and/or prosecution of their exploiters to stay in the UK for that purpose.
We do not publish the other data requested.
Asked by: Lord McColl of Dulwich (Conservative - Life peer)
Question to the Home Office:
To ask His Majesty's Government, in the past three years, how many victims of modern slavery have qualified for leave to remain to pursue a compensation claim or a criminal case against their traffickers.
Answered by Lord Sharpe of Epsom - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Home Office)
We carefully reviewed the commitment made regarding the provision of 12 months’ support to modern slavery victims with a positive Conclusive Grounds decision and concluded that the Recovery Needs Assessment ensures that necessary support is available to victims with a positive Conclusive Grounds decision for the necessary length of time, including if this is 12 months, or longer. There is therefore no need to specify 12-month support for all individuals in guidance and no current plans to do so.
A total of 10,704 consenting adults in England and Wales received support through the Modern Slavery Victim Care contract during the year ending June 2023, the largest number support for any year since the contract began, and the Government remains committed to supporting victims based on need.
Through Section 65 of the Nationality and Borders Act 2022, the Government also set out, for the first time in primary legislation, that confirmed victims of modern slavery are eligible for temporary permission to stay in the UK. Depending on the individual circumstances, Temporary Permission to Stay can be granted for 12 months, or more, to confirmed victims of Modern Slavery. This delivers a fair and effective permission to stay process in relation to confirmed victims of modern slavery, allowing those who are cooperating with public authorities in the investigation and/or prosecution of their exploiters to stay in the UK for that purpose.
We do not publish the other data requested.
Asked by: Lord McColl of Dulwich (Conservative - Life peer)
Question to the Home Office:
To ask His Majesty's Government, in the past three years, how many victims of modern slavery have (1) received support following a recovery needs assessment, (2) received all the support they asked for, and (3) received support for 12 months or more.
Answered by Lord Sharpe of Epsom - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Home Office)
We carefully reviewed the commitment made regarding the provision of 12 months’ support to modern slavery victims with a positive Conclusive Grounds decision and concluded that the Recovery Needs Assessment ensures that necessary support is available to victims with a positive Conclusive Grounds decision for the necessary length of time, including if this is 12 months, or longer. There is therefore no need to specify 12-month support for all individuals in guidance and no current plans to do so.
A total of 10,704 consenting adults in England and Wales received support through the Modern Slavery Victim Care contract during the year ending June 2023, the largest number support for any year since the contract began, and the Government remains committed to supporting victims based on need.
Through Section 65 of the Nationality and Borders Act 2022, the Government also set out, for the first time in primary legislation, that confirmed victims of modern slavery are eligible for temporary permission to stay in the UK. Depending on the individual circumstances, Temporary Permission to Stay can be granted for 12 months, or more, to confirmed victims of Modern Slavery. This delivers a fair and effective permission to stay process in relation to confirmed victims of modern slavery, allowing those who are cooperating with public authorities in the investigation and/or prosecution of their exploiters to stay in the UK for that purpose.
We do not publish the other data requested.
Asked by: Lord McColl of Dulwich (Conservative - Life peer)
Question to the Home Office:
To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the final report of the Independent Review of the Modern Slavery Act 2015, published on 22 May 2019, and the Interim Guidance for Independent Child Trafficking Guardians, updated on 18 November 2021, how many children and young people who had someone with parental responsibility were supported with one-to-one support from the Independent Child Trafficking Guardians service between January and September; how many young people had support from the Independent Child Trafficking Guardians service continued after their 18th birthday, between January and September; and when they intend to publish evaluations of the tests of those models.
Answered by Lord Sharpe of Epsom - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Home Office)
Independent Child Trafficking Guardians (ICTGs) operate in two thirds of local authorities across England and Wales, in addition to the statutory support provided to children by local authorities.
ICTGs provide an additional source of advice and support for potentially trafficked children, irrespective of nationality, and somebody to advocate on their behalf to ensure their best interests are reflected in the decision-making of the public authorities involved in their care.
The ICTG service model provides one-to-one support for children with no parental responsibility for them in the UK via an ICTG Direct Worker and an expert ICTG Regional Practice Co-ordinator for children where there is someone with parental responsibility for them in the UK.
The data requested regarding ICTGs for the timeframe specified has not previously been published and has not yet been verified. We are therefore unable to release the information at this time.
Data tables published in November 2021 in the UK Annual Report on Modern Slavery: 2021 UK Annual Report on Modern Slavery (accessible version) - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)(opens in a new tab) show the numbers of children referred to Direct Workers and Regional Practice Coordinators, broken down by region, in 2019 and 2020.
To date, two evaluations on the ICTG service have been published: An evaluation of Independent Child Trafficking Guardians - early adopter sites: Final report - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk) and An assessment of Independent Child Trafficking Guardians - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)
There are currently no plans to publish the evaluation report of changes to the ICTG service from the Independent Review of the Modern Slavery Act 2015.
Asked by: Lord McColl of Dulwich (Conservative - Life peer)
Question to the Home Office:
To ask His Majesty's Government how many children and young people who were supported by the Independent Child Trafficking Guardian service between January and September had experienced (1) sexual exploitation, (2) criminal exploitation, (3) labour exploitation, and (4) domestic servitude.
Answered by Lord Sharpe of Epsom - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Home Office)
Independent Child Trafficking Guardians (ICTGs) operate in two thirds of local authorities across England and Wales, in addition to the statutory support provided to children by local authorities.
ICTGs provide an additional source of advice and support for potentially trafficked children, irrespective of nationality, and somebody to advocate on their behalf to ensure their best interests are reflected in the decision-making of the public authorities involved in their care.
The ICTG service model provides one-to-one support for children with no parental responsibility for them in the UK via an ICTG Direct Worker and an expert ICTG Regional Practice Co-ordinator for children where there is someone with parental responsibility for them in the UK.
The data requested regarding ICTGs for the timeframe specified has not previously been published and has not yet been verified. We are therefore unable to release the information at this time.
Data tables published in November 2021 in the UK Annual Report on Modern Slavery: 2021 UK Annual Report on Modern Slavery (accessible version) - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)(opens in a new tab) show the numbers of children referred to Direct Workers and Regional Practice Coordinators, broken down by region, in 2019 and 2020.
To date, two evaluations on the ICTG service have been published: An evaluation of Independent Child Trafficking Guardians - early adopter sites: Final report - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk) and An assessment of Independent Child Trafficking Guardians - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)
There are currently no plans to publish the evaluation report of changes to the ICTG service from the Independent Review of the Modern Slavery Act 2015.
Asked by: Lord McColl of Dulwich (Conservative - Life peer)
Question to the Home Office:
To ask His Majesty's Government how many children and young people were supported by the Independent Child Trafficking Guardian service between January and September; and, of those, how many (1) were supported by a direct worker, and (2) were under the oversight of a Regional Practice Coordinator.
Answered by Lord Sharpe of Epsom - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Home Office)
Independent Child Trafficking Guardians (ICTGs) operate in two thirds of local authorities across England and Wales, in addition to the statutory support provided to children by local authorities.
ICTGs provide an additional source of advice and support for potentially trafficked children, irrespective of nationality, and somebody to advocate on their behalf to ensure their best interests are reflected in the decision-making of the public authorities involved in their care.
The ICTG service model provides one-to-one support for children with no parental responsibility for them in the UK via an ICTG Direct Worker and an expert ICTG Regional Practice Co-ordinator for children where there is someone with parental responsibility for them in the UK.
The data requested regarding ICTGs for the timeframe specified has not previously been published and has not yet been verified. We are therefore unable to release the information at this time.
Data tables published in November 2021 in the UK Annual Report on Modern Slavery: 2021 UK Annual Report on Modern Slavery (accessible version) - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)(opens in a new tab) show the numbers of children referred to Direct Workers and Regional Practice Coordinators, broken down by region, in 2019 and 2020.
To date, two evaluations on the ICTG service have been published: An evaluation of Independent Child Trafficking Guardians - early adopter sites: Final report - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk) and An assessment of Independent Child Trafficking Guardians - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)
There are currently no plans to publish the evaluation report of changes to the ICTG service from the Independent Review of the Modern Slavery Act 2015.
Asked by: Lord McColl of Dulwich (Conservative - Life peer)
Question to the Home Office:
To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Safeguarding on 13 September (HC197778), how specifically the £37 million Modern Slavery Fund has been spent.
Answered by Lord Sharpe of Epsom - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Home Office)
It has not proved possible to respond to this question in the time available before Prorogation. Ministers will correspond directly with the Member.
Asked by: Lord McColl of Dulwich (Conservative - Life peer)
Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:
To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Markham on 17 February (HL5559), whether individuals who do not have (1) a BMI of less than 18.5 kilograms/m2, (2) unintentional weight loss greater than 10 per cent within the last three to six months, or (3) a BMI of less than 20 kilograms/m2 and unintentional weight loss greater than five per cent within the last three to six months, are therefore not defined as malnourished or undernourished; and whether there are any other scientific measurements or criteria that would justify obese individuals not being defined as malnourished or undernourished.
Answered by Lord Markham - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)
There is no agreed scientific nor universal definition of overnutrition, however the National Health Service refers to overnutrition as getting more nutrients than needed. Excess intake of macronutrients will mean an excess intake of energy, leading to weight gain and obesity. Excess intake of individual micronutrients may be associated with specific adverse health outcomes depending on the vitamin or mineral. Population prevalence of obesity is monitored by the Health Survey for England and data on population average energy and nutrient intakes are collected by the National Diet and Nutrition Survey. However, at an individual level, healthcare professionals may assess and monitor a patient’s weight and/or nutritional status depending on clinical need.
Although there is no formal assessment of malnutrition at a population-level, NHS Digital collects data on finished hospital admission episodes of malnutrition in England, based on International Classification of Disease (ICD-10) codes. The cause of malnutrition is not presented in the Hospital Episode Statistics.
The criteria referred to are from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) clinical guidelines CG32 ‘Nutrition support for adults: oral nutrition support, enteral tube feeding and parenteral nutrition’ and are recommended as indications for when nutrition support should be considered. This NICE guideline also states that nutrition support should be considered in people at risk of malnutrition, defined as those who have eaten little or nothing for more than 5 days and/or are likely to eat little or nothing for 5 days or longer; a poor absorptive capacity and/or high nutrient losses; and/or increased nutritional needs from causes such as catabolism. Healthcare professionals might use other screening or assessment tools, or their own clinical judgement regarding additional signs and symptoms, to assess whether someone is at risk of malnutrition.
In the NICE guideline CG32, the term malnutrition is not used to cover excess nutrient provision (overnutrition). However, someone can be a healthy weight or have a body mass index in the overweight or obese categories but be identified through the NICE definition as potentially requiring nutrition support. Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) are also reported for scurvy and rickets, conditions which result from nutrient deficiencies, but these are reported separately to the HES for malnutrition.
Asked by: Lord McColl of Dulwich (Conservative - Life peer)
Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:
To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Markham on 17 February (HL5559), how many people in England are deemed to be malnourished; and what proportion of those are caused by (1) undernutrition, and (2) overnutrition.
Answered by Lord Markham - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)
There is no agreed scientific nor universal definition of overnutrition, however the National Health Service refers to overnutrition as getting more nutrients than needed. Excess intake of macronutrients will mean an excess intake of energy, leading to weight gain and obesity. Excess intake of individual micronutrients may be associated with specific adverse health outcomes depending on the vitamin or mineral. Population prevalence of obesity is monitored by the Health Survey for England and data on population average energy and nutrient intakes are collected by the National Diet and Nutrition Survey. However, at an individual level, healthcare professionals may assess and monitor a patient’s weight and/or nutritional status depending on clinical need.
Although there is no formal assessment of malnutrition at a population-level, NHS Digital collects data on finished hospital admission episodes of malnutrition in England, based on International Classification of Disease (ICD-10) codes. The cause of malnutrition is not presented in the Hospital Episode Statistics.
The criteria referred to are from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) clinical guidelines CG32 ‘Nutrition support for adults: oral nutrition support, enteral tube feeding and parenteral nutrition’ and are recommended as indications for when nutrition support should be considered. This NICE guideline also states that nutrition support should be considered in people at risk of malnutrition, defined as those who have eaten little or nothing for more than 5 days and/or are likely to eat little or nothing for 5 days or longer; a poor absorptive capacity and/or high nutrient losses; and/or increased nutritional needs from causes such as catabolism. Healthcare professionals might use other screening or assessment tools, or their own clinical judgement regarding additional signs and symptoms, to assess whether someone is at risk of malnutrition.
In the NICE guideline CG32, the term malnutrition is not used to cover excess nutrient provision (overnutrition). However, someone can be a healthy weight or have a body mass index in the overweight or obese categories but be identified through the NICE definition as potentially requiring nutrition support. Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) are also reported for scurvy and rickets, conditions which result from nutrient deficiencies, but these are reported separately to the HES for malnutrition.
Asked by: Lord McColl of Dulwich (Conservative - Life peer)
Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:
To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Markham on 17 February (HL5559), what is the scientific definition of overnutrition; and how this is measured and monitored in obese individuals.
Answered by Lord Markham - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)
There is no agreed scientific nor universal definition of overnutrition, however the National Health Service refers to overnutrition as getting more nutrients than needed. Excess intake of macronutrients will mean an excess intake of energy, leading to weight gain and obesity. Excess intake of individual micronutrients may be associated with specific adverse health outcomes depending on the vitamin or mineral. Population prevalence of obesity is monitored by the Health Survey for England and data on population average energy and nutrient intakes are collected by the National Diet and Nutrition Survey. However, at an individual level, healthcare professionals may assess and monitor a patient’s weight and/or nutritional status depending on clinical need.
Although there is no formal assessment of malnutrition at a population-level, NHS Digital collects data on finished hospital admission episodes of malnutrition in England, based on International Classification of Disease (ICD-10) codes. The cause of malnutrition is not presented in the Hospital Episode Statistics.
The criteria referred to are from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) clinical guidelines CG32 ‘Nutrition support for adults: oral nutrition support, enteral tube feeding and parenteral nutrition’ and are recommended as indications for when nutrition support should be considered. This NICE guideline also states that nutrition support should be considered in people at risk of malnutrition, defined as those who have eaten little or nothing for more than 5 days and/or are likely to eat little or nothing for 5 days or longer; a poor absorptive capacity and/or high nutrient losses; and/or increased nutritional needs from causes such as catabolism. Healthcare professionals might use other screening or assessment tools, or their own clinical judgement regarding additional signs and symptoms, to assess whether someone is at risk of malnutrition.
In the NICE guideline CG32, the term malnutrition is not used to cover excess nutrient provision (overnutrition). However, someone can be a healthy weight or have a body mass index in the overweight or obese categories but be identified through the NICE definition as potentially requiring nutrition support. Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) are also reported for scurvy and rickets, conditions which result from nutrient deficiencies, but these are reported separately to the HES for malnutrition.