All 1 Debates between Lord Marland and Baroness McIntosh of Hudnall

Energy: Voltage Optimisation

Debate between Lord Marland and Baroness McIntosh of Hudnall
Monday 12th March 2012

(12 years, 9 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lord Marland Portrait Lord Marland
- Hansard - -

This is the first question I have been asked. The overall reduction in energy consumption and carbon reduction in No. 10 was 10 per cent. That was in line with government demand. I can tell the noble Lord that we achieved 13.8 per cent over government, but I am afraid I cannot answer his question about specific costs. I shall be happy to write to him on that subject.

Baroness McIntosh of Hudnall Portrait Baroness McIntosh of Hudnall
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, the Minister said that he was no scientist and I have to say that I share that with him; I am certainly no scientist. However, I fail to understand his answer to the noble Baroness, Lady Worthington. Is or is not the voltage optimisation scheme that she is recommending part of the energy reduction that the Government are trying to promote?

Lord Marland Portrait Lord Marland
- Hansard - -

The Government are not here to take on all sorts of design that come in, although we are obviously keen to promote any reduction in electricity demand or supply, particularly in demand—and voltage optimisation is one such thing. It is already in existence. We have led by example, as I have indicated, in our department and No. 10. We encourage all people to look at it on a commercial basis because it saves on electricity demand. I hope that that answers the noble Baroness’s question. I repeat for her benefit that I am not entirely clear whether it is of benefit in domestic situations. I have asked my department to organise a workshop on the Green Deal in the next month to study it carefully.