Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill

Debate between Lord Markham and Lord Hamilton of Epsom

Committee stage
Friday 27th February 2026 Lords Chamber

[Lord Markham (Con)]

I let my noble friend finish but I just want to give a bit of my own experience as a former Health Minister. I think we would all agree that clinicians always look at what is the best outcome for their patients, regardless of cost. I want to put very clearly here today that, although I am sure it is not anyone’s intention to suggest that clinicians will somehow be incentivised to push one course of treatment, be it assisted dying or another, for reasons of cost, all our experiences of the health service are that clinicians will always put the welfare of their patient first and that financial considerations do not come into it.

[Lord Hamilton of Epsom (Con)]

I wish I could agree with my noble friend Lord Markham, but at the end of the day we have a National Health Service and it has to make choices, and we know that the National Health Service is desperately short of money. If it can save money by making sure that people go for assisted dying, I am sure it will do that, on the basis that then it could keep other people alive. Those are the invidious choices that the National Health Service has to make. I always assumed—I will give way in a minute—that, for the proposers of the Bill, one of their reasons was that they wanted to save money. I agree that the money concerned would not be very big, but at the end of the day there is an incentive to save money by ensuring that people opt for assisted dying, thereby saving the National Health Service money. I give way to the noble Baroness.