Information between 6th March 2026 - 16th March 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
10 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Lord Markham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 128 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 189 Noes - 157 |
|
10 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Lord Markham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 148 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 216 Noes - 170 |
|
10 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Lord Markham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 160 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 252 Noes - 171 |
|
10 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Lord Markham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 165 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 257 Noes - 174 |
|
10 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Lord Markham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 172 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 273 Noes - 180 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Markham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 162 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 200 Noes - 162 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Markham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 69 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 76 Noes - 185 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Markham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 70 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 82 Noes - 151 |
|
11 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Markham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 149 Conservative Aye votes vs 1 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 163 Noes - 153 |
|
11 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Markham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 178 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 227 Noes - 221 |
|
11 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Markham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 181 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 215 Noes - 180 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Lord Markham speeches from: Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill
Lord Markham contributed 5 speeches (391 words) Committee stage Friday 13th March 2026 - Lords Chamber Ministry of Justice |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Fluoride: Water Supply
Asked by: Lord Markham (Conservative - Life peer) Tuesday 10th March 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Merron on 16 February (HL14539), whether they will ensure that any new water regulations include a clear requirement for water companies to support, maintain and, where appropriate, expand fluoridation schemes in their areas. Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) The maintenance and expansion of water fluoridation schemes are set out in the Water Industry Act 1991 and associated regulations. These provide the requirements that apply to water companies where my Rt Hon. Friend, the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, proposes to enter, vary, or terminate arrangements for fluoridation of water. There are no current plans to change these requirements through new regulations. However, the White Paper A New Vision for Water published in January 2026 confirms that, as long term reforms to the water industry are delivered, the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs will work in partnership with the Department of Health and Social Care to support delivery of 10-Year Health Plan, which includes assessing further expansion of water fluoridation where oral health outcomes are poorest. |
|
Fluoride: Water Supply
Asked by: Lord Markham (Conservative - Life peer) Monday 16th March 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask His Majesty's Government further to the Written Answer by Baroness Merron on 16 February (HL14539), whether water companies are required to make an active contribution to the protection and improvement of public health. Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) Water companies have statutory and regulatory duties to protect and improve public health and actively take steps to meet them. These include completion of risk assessments and the sampling of drinking water supplies that may cause the supply not to be wholesome. “Wholesomeness” is defined in the Water Supply (Water Quality) Regulations 2016 as water which does not contain any microorganism, parasite, or substance at a concentration or value which would constitute a potential danger to public health. Where a water company is also legally required to add fluoride to water supplies to improve public health, it must do so in a way that complies with the Drinking Water Inspectorate’s Code of Practice on Technical Aspects of Fluoridation of Water Supplies 2021. Protecting and improving public health is also a priority in the Government’s planned reforms for the water sector. A new taskforce, led by the Chief Medical Officer for England, will support the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, providing independent and technical advice on public health risks from water and opportunities to improve water treatment and protection. |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill
195 speeches (43,033 words) Committee stage Friday 13th March 2026 - Lords Chamber Ministry of Justice Mentions: 1: Lord Harper (Con - Life peer) reconcile in this legislation.The other very important issue—I am pleased to see my noble friend Lord Markham - Link to Speech |