To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Written Question
Cultural Heritage: Tax Allowances
Tuesday 3rd December 2024

Asked by: Lord Mann (Labour - Life peer)

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask His Majesty's Government how many landowners claim annually through the tax-exempt heritage assets scheme; and how much they claim each year.

Answered by Lord Livermore - Financial Secretary (HM Treasury)

Conditional exemption from Inheritance Tax is available for transfers during lifetime or on death of land of outstanding scenic, historic, or scientific interest, buildings of outstanding historic or architectural interest and land protecting the setting of an outstanding building together with objects and collections of national, artistic, historic or scientific interest.

Information on how many landowners claim annually through the tax-exempt heritage assets scheme, and how much they claim each year, is not centrally collated. However, HMRC publishes annual official statistics on Inheritance Tax liabilities at https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/inheritance-tax-liabilities-statistics. Table 12.2 has information on the number of estates claiming reliefs and exemptions.


Speech in General Committees - Tue 12 Feb 2019
Draft Small Charitable Donations Act (Amendment) Order 2019

"I will not be abstaining on the instrument; I will be supporting it on behalf of the charities in my constituency, where there are a lot of small charities. This is a minor but eminently sensible proposal by the Government, which will be welcomed by the many small charities in …..."
Lord Mann - View Speech

View all Lord Mann (Lab - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Draft Small Charitable Donations Act (Amendment) Order 2019

Written Question
Tax Avoidance
Thursday 13th December 2018

Asked by: Lord Mann (Labour - Life peer)

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what estimate he has made of the number of people who will be affected by the new 2019 loan charge (a) in total and (b) who are public sector workers.

Answered by Mel Stride - Shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer

The charge on disguised remuneration (DR) loans is targeted at artificial tax avoidance schemes where earnings were paid via a third party in the form of ‘loans’. These loans were paid in place of ordinary remuneration, with the sole purpose of avoiding income tax and National Insurance contributions. In reality these loans were never repaid. When taking into account the loan they received, loan scheme users have on average twice as much income as the average UK taxpayer.

The Government estimates that up to 50,000 individuals will be affected by the 2019 loan charge. HMRC has published a breakdown of individuals affected by industry. HMRC data indicates that fewer than 3% of those affected work in medical services (doctors and nurses) and teaching. No estimate of the number of individuals affected within the public sector overall is available. Further information can be found at the following link: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/loan-schemes-and-the-loan-charge-an-overview/tax-avoidance-loan-schemes-and-the-loan-charge#who-affected

HMRC has simplified the process for those who choose to settle their use of avoidance schemes before the charge arises, so that those earning less than £50,000 a year and no longer engaging in tax avoidance can agree a payment plan of up to five years without the need for detailed supporting information. There is no maximum period within which an overall settlement can be agreed, and HMRC will deal with individual cases appropriately and sympathetically.


Speech in Commons Chamber - Tue 17 Apr 2018
Oral Answers to Questions

"13. What comparative assessment he has made of the size of the national debt (a) today and (b) 12 months ago. ..."
Lord Mann - View Speech

View all Lord Mann (Lab - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Oral Answers to Questions

Speech in Commons Chamber - Tue 17 Apr 2018
Oral Answers to Questions

"The national debt is going up by £5,000 a second. Can I be helpful? Will the Minister join me in stopping hospitals that are outsourcing staffing to avoid VAT, with an estimated 6% savings on wages lost to the Treasury, from doing so?..."
Lord Mann - View Speech

View all Lord Mann (Lab - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Oral Answers to Questions

Written Question
Fire Extinguishers: Non-domestic Rates
Thursday 7th September 2017

Asked by: Lord Mann (Labour - Life peer)

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, how much is levied each year in additional business rates due to (a) sprinklers and (b) other fire protection systems being classified as plant and machinery or being otherwise subject to higher rates.

Answered by Mel Stride - Shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer

Sprinkler and fire protection systems are named items within the relevant business rates legislation relating to plant and machinery and as such are rateable. The value of such systems are usually reflected in the overall rateable value of the building, although more specialist systems may be separately valued as an individual plant and machinery item.

The VOA does not routinely record the proportion of a property's assessment that is attributable to the sprinkler or fire protection systems. Therefore it is not possible to determine how much is levied each year in business rates in respect of sprinklers and fire protections systems.


Written Question
CCTV: Non-domestic Rates
Thursday 7th September 2017

Asked by: Lord Mann (Labour - Life peer)

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, how much is levied in additional business rates as a result of the installation of CCTV attracting a higher level of such rates.

Answered by Mel Stride - Shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer

CCTV systems are named items within the relevant business rates legislation relating to plant and machinery and as such are rateable. The value of such systems are usually reflected in the overall value of the building, although more specialist systems may be separately valued as an individual plant and machinery item.

The VOA does not routinely record the proportion of a property's assessment that is attributable to a CCTV system. Therefore it is not possible to determine how much is levied each year in business rates in respect of CCTV systems.


Written Question
Fire Extinguishers: Non-domestic Rates
Thursday 7th September 2017

Asked by: Lord Mann (Labour - Life peer)

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, how much is levied in additional business rates on landlords of residential properties as a result of the classification of sprinkler systems as plant and machinery or otherwise so as to attract a higher level of such rates.

Answered by Mel Stride - Shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer

Most residential properties are liable for council tax, not business rates. In the main, it is the occupier of a residential property that is liable for council tax, rather than the landlord.

The value of any sprinkler system would usually be included in the council tax banding assessment.

The VOA does not routinely record the proportion of a property's assessment that is attributable to a sprinkler system.


Speech in Commons Chamber - Wed 05 Jul 2017
Public Sector Pay Cap

"As a public sector worker, how much has the right hon. Lady’s own pay increased since 2010 and how much has her productivity increased since 2010? Can the country afford her pay increase, and if so, does she agree with me that Britain deserves a pay increase?..."
Lord Mann - View Speech

View all Lord Mann (Lab - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Public Sector Pay Cap

Speech in Commons Chamber - Thu 29 Jun 2017
Economy and Jobs

"Will the Chancellor give way?..."
Lord Mann - View Speech

View all Lord Mann (Lab - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Economy and Jobs