Supermarkets: Voluntary Price Caps
Debate between Lord Livermore and Lord Sharpe of Epsom(3 weeks, 4 days ago)
Lords ChamberRead Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Sharpe of Epsom
To ask His Majesty’s Government what plans they have to ask supermarkets to introduce voluntary price caps or freezes on essential food items; and what assessment they have made of the impact of such measures on food prices, supply, competition and investment.
The Financial Secretary to the Treasury (Lord Livermore) (Lab)
My Lords, the Chancellor has held a round table with supermarkets to discuss the role that retailers can play in bearing down on food prices and the additional steps that the Government can take. This comes on top of the action that the Government have already taken to reduce the cost of living, which has helped drive today’s larger than expected fall in inflation.
Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Con)
My Lords, I am grateful to the Minister for his Answer. The Government should understand and know that price controls do not work and do not reduce prices. They instead suppress supply, create shortages, and ultimately leave consumers worse off and more exposed to food insecurity. I must say that, when we first heard these stories, we feared that the ghost of Stalin was roaming the corridors of the Treasury. For the avoidance of doubt, will the Minister today give an unequivocal commitment that the Government will rule out price caps, voluntary or otherwise, entirely? Can I suggest that he confers with noble Lords in this House, including on his own Benches, who will confirm that the supermarket industry is fiercely competitive?
Lord Livermore (Lab)
I am grateful to the noble Lord for his questions. I agree with his last point, if not all of what he said. I understand exactly what he set out, which is why we are not doing what he suggests we are doing. We are of course having discussions with supermarkets—that is the right thing to do—as we have with all sectors. The Chancellor has held round tables with fuel retailers, supermarkets and high street banks, among other industries. It is right that we discuss ways we can work together to ease the cost of living for households. This is not about price caps, as some speculation has suggested. We will never advocate for that, as it is not for the Government to tell supermarkets how to do their jobs. We are taking action across the board, with rail fare freezes, prescription fee freezes and £150 off energy bills. These are the driving factors behind today’s bigger than expected fall in inflation. Further, today, the Chancellor extended the 5p cut on fuel duty and introduced further new fuel duty support for HGVs and farmers.
Denial of Banking Services: UK Defence Sector
Debate between Lord Livermore and Lord Sharpe of Epsom(1 year ago)
Lords ChamberRead Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Sharpe of Epsom
To ask His Majesty’s Government what progress they have made in reforming environmental, social, and governance rules to ensure that they are not used by financial institutions to deny banking services, including loans, to the UK defence sector.
The Financial Secretary to the Treasury (Lord Livermore) (Lab)
My Lords, the Government have been clear that there is nothing contradictory between ESG considerations and defence. No company should ever be denied access to financial services solely on the basis that they work in the defence sector. The Government are working closely with the defence sector and financial services to identify the extent of this issue, to reduce barriers to essential banking services and to support a resilient defence industry.
Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Con)
My Lords, I am grateful to the Minister for that Answer, and somewhat reassured. However, there is still evidence—plenty, in fact—of the threat of debanking faced by SMEs in this sector because of an absurdly overzealous interpretation of ESG considerations. The Government’s defence commitments are welcome, but private capital will of course be necessary to deliver those. Can the Government commit now to bringing ESG rating agencies within the regulatory perimeter, which will force greater transparency? Will they also take a leading role in underlining the desirability of investment in defence and national security, such as by using the National Wealth Fund and encouraging local government pension funds and other public investment vehicles to allocate funds to the sector? While they are at it, can they perhaps also remind the banks that defending the nation is profoundly ethical?
Lord Livermore (Lab)
I am grateful to the noble Lord for his Question, and I am happy to say that to all three of his supplementary questions the answer is yes. I agree with a lot of what he says. Access to finance is a significant issue for defence SMEs, and as a result it will be one of the key considerations for the forthcoming defence industrial strategy. It is not entirely clear-cut that all those access to finance issues are a result of ESG considerations; there are many more, and it is quite a complex picture. As for the noble Lord’s three questions, we recognise that the ESG market has developed quickly and without formal oversight, leading to some stakeholders raising significant concerns. To address those concerns, the Government will lay secondary legislation later this year to bring ESG ratings providers into regulation so that they are subject to rules set by the FCA. We have also set defence as one of the priority sectors that we want the National Wealth Fund to invest in—I think that was the noble Lord’s second question. Finally, we are working closely with the banking sector to make sure that it understands the importance of the defence sector to the economy.
Exports to the European Union
Debate between Lord Livermore and Lord Sharpe of Epsom(1 year, 6 months ago)
Lords ChamberRead Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Livermore (Lab)
I completely agree with the noble Earl. The creative industries, along with many others in our country, have been hit particularly hard by Brexit. We have identified the creative industries as part of the EU reset, identifying touring visas in particular as one of the priorities. The Prime Minister met with the President of the European Commission in Brussels on 2 October, and they have agreed to strengthen the relationship between the EU and the UK, putting it on a more solid and stable footing. We will now work with the EU to identify areas where we can strengthen co-operation for mutual benefit. Obviously, we recognise that delivering new agreements will take time, but we are ambitious, have clear priorities and want to move forward at pace.
Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Con)
My Lords, what precise steps are the Government taking to increase the number of trade agreements with non-EU countries, such as those that the previous Government negotiated including of course with the CPTPP, which noble Lords will be aware represents the fastest-growing economic region in the world?
Lord Livermore (Lab)
As the noble Lord knows, we have acceded to that partnership already. At the G20 this week, the Prime Minister spoke about reopening negotiations with India. In the spring, the Government will publish a trade strategy, in part to reset our relationship with the EU, but also to support more small businesses to export and remove barriers to trade right around the world.