Debates between Lord Livermore and Lord Altrincham during the 2024 Parliament

National Insurance: GDP

Debate between Lord Livermore and Lord Altrincham
Thursday 19th December 2024

(4 days, 17 hours ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Altrincham Portrait Lord Altrincham
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

To ask His Majesty’s Government what assessment they have made of the impact of the increase in National Insurance contributions for employers on gross domestic product growth.

Lord Livermore Portrait The Financial Secretary to the Treasury (Lord Livermore) (Lab)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

My Lords, the £22 billion black hole left by the—

--- Later in debate ---
Lord Livermore Portrait Lord Livermore (Lab)
- Hansard - -

The £22 billion black hole left by the previous Government meant we had to make very difficult decisions to repair the public finances, rebuild public services and restore economic stability. Following the Budget, the Office for Budget Responsibility has revised up its growth forecasts for the next two years, as has the Bank of England. The OECD now expects the UK to be the fastest-growing European G7 economy. The OBR has also said that there will be significant increase in growth as a result of the Budget over the longer term.

Lord Altrincham Portrait Lord Altrincham (Con)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

I wish the Minister a happy Christmas, even with the reminder of the schwarzes Loch.

Memories of Christmas past and the story of A Christmas Carol remind us that extracting the most amount of money from a business can have surprising consequences. In this case, can the Minister comment on whether increasing employment costs will lead to an increase in prices or a reduction in jobs, and can he specifically comment for us on the impact on the hospice sector?

Lord Livermore Portrait Lord Livermore (Lab)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

I wish the noble Lord a merry Christmas and a happy New Year in return. As I said, we did have to clear up the mess that we inherited, and that did mean taking some very difficult decisions. I of course understand and respect the legitimate concerns that have been raised, and we have consistently acknowledged that there will be wider impacts as a result of the decisions that we have taken. But I do genuinely say that not to act and not to repair the public finances and restore economic stability was simply not an option. As I have said, let us be clear: following the Budget, the OBR, the Bank of England and the OECD have all revised up their growth forecasts.

School Fees: VAT

Debate between Lord Livermore and Lord Altrincham
Thursday 10th October 2024

(2 months, 1 week ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Livermore Portrait Lord Livermore (Lab)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

The answer to the noble Baroness’s first question is no and the answer to her second question is that that is a matter for the spending review. I disagree fundamentally with her characterisation of this policy. I want to see excellence in education for children in places like where I grew up, whose parents will never be able to afford to pay for their education. They are every bit as ambitious for their children as any other parent.

Lord Altrincham Portrait Lord Altrincham (Con)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

Will the Minister confirm that any gains from this policy will accrue to the education budget and that any shortfall will be met by the education budget? Will he commit to sharing with this House the OBR’s impact assessment of the number of pupils moving from the private sector to the state sector and the number where the overall policy would be at a fiscal cost to the Exchequer?

Lord Livermore Portrait Lord Livermore (Lab)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

There were several questions there. Yes, this money will go to the state sector; I do not accept that there will be any loss from this policy; and yes, the OBR will publish the impact assessment alongside the Budget.