Lord Lipsey Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Lord Lipsey

Information between 3rd March 2024 - 12th April 2024

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
4 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Lipsey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 126 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 277 Noes - 167
4 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Lipsey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 123 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 274 Noes - 172
4 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Lipsey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 127 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 282 Noes - 180
6 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Lipsey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 121 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 228 Noes - 184
6 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Lipsey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 119 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 244 Noes - 160
6 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Lipsey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 125 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 278 Noes - 189
6 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Lipsey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 126 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 265 Noes - 181
6 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Lipsey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 119 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 246 Noes - 171
20 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Lipsey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 126 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 249 Noes - 219
20 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Lipsey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 129 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 263 Noes - 233
20 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Lipsey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 125 Labour Aye votes vs 2 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 248 Noes - 209
20 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Lipsey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 126 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 276 Noes - 226
20 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Lipsey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 129 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 285 Noes - 230
20 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Lipsey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 128 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 271 Noes - 228
20 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Lipsey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 124 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 251 Noes - 214


Speeches
Lord Lipsey speeches from: Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill
Lord Lipsey contributed 1 speech (449 words)
Consideration of Commons amendments
Wednesday 20th March 2024 - Lords Chamber
Home Office


Written Answers
Taxation: Electronic Government
Asked by: Lord Lipsey (Labour - Life peer)
Wednesday 13th March 2024

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask His Majesty's Government why they do not include a postal address option on tax code notices to enable digitally excluded people to contact HMRC more easily.

Answered by Baroness Vere of Norbiton - Parliamentary Secretary (HM Treasury)

HMRC removed postal address from notices to encourage customers to use their digital services and interact with them online through their Personal Tax Account. Customers can submit queries electronically via HMRC’s iForm, which is handled by a dedicated team similar post correspondence.

For those unable to engage online, HMRC continues to provide support through telephone, including the Extra Support Service. This service is for customers who cannot contact HMRC due to health or personal issues. They can request phone, video, or in-person appointments when calling the helplines, and HMRC’s advisers will assess their circumstances to offer the best option for them.

More information can be found on the Extra Support Service at:

Get help from HMRC if you need extra support: Help you can get - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)

Revenue and Customs: Telephone Services
Asked by: Lord Lipsey (Labour - Life peer)
Thursday 21st March 2024

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask His Majesty's Government what is the (1) median, and (2) upper decile, wait time for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs to answer telephone calls.

Answered by Baroness Vere of Norbiton - Parliamentary Secretary (HM Treasury)

HMRC does not report on the median or upper decile wait times for telephone calls. However, HMRC publishes data on the average speed of answer for customer calls and the percentage of calls where the customer waited more than 10 minutes.


This information can be found at the following link:

https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/hmrc-monthly-performance-reports#reporting-year-2023-to-2024

Taxation: Electronic Government
Asked by: Lord Lipsey (Labour - Life peer)
Monday 8th April 2024

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask His Majesty's Government what consideration they gave to the Report from the Communications and Digital Committee Digital exclusion (3rd Report, Session 2022–23, HL Paper 219) when removing the postal address for HMRC from tax code notices.

Answered by Baroness Vere of Norbiton - Parliamentary Secretary (HM Treasury)

HMRC could not have considered the 2022-23 Communications and Digital Committee Report on Digital Exclusion when removing the postal address from tax code notices, as this change occurred over 5 years ago. In keeping with the HMRC Charter principles, the Department aims to balance digital initiatives with accessibility for those facing digital exclusion.




Lord Lipsey mentioned

Parliamentary Debates
Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill
88 speeches (16,617 words)
Consideration of Commons amendments
Wednesday 20th March 2024 - Lords Chamber
Home Office
Mentions:
1: Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb (Green - Life peer) My Lords, what a pleasure to follow the noble Lord, Lord Lipsey, with whom I agree. - Link to Speech
2: Baroness Fox of Buckley (Non-affiliated - Life peer) Lipsey, who asked if it is always right that the elected House must prevail. - Link to Speech
3: None The noble Lord, Lord Lipsey, spoke about the duties of this place in relation to the other place and - Link to Speech
4: None As I said in response to the noble Lord, Lord Lipsey, we must urgently address the matter of fatalities - Link to Speech