(6 years, 5 months ago)
Lords ChamberParliament held a debate, Parliament voted, and Parliament decided to hold a referendum on this issue and to be bound by that referendum. Whatever the theoretical constitutional position of a referendum, many statements were made on both sides that we would be bound by the result of that referendum.
Parliament authorised the referendum but it did not authorise the outcome of the discussions. That is what the Supreme Court has ruled.
(8 years, 8 months ago)
Lords ChamberI am happy to give way, but I have already taken eight minutes. I will let the House judge who should intervene.