Information between 14th April 2026 - 13th July 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
15 Apr 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Lord Kinnock voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 165 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 209 Noes - 260 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Lord Kinnock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 169 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 270 Noes - 200 |
|
20 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Kinnock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 156 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 276 Noes - 169 |
|
20 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Kinnock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 153 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 259 Noes - 180 |
|
20 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Kinnock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 139 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 162 Noes - 151 |
|
20 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Kinnock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 142 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 211 Noes - 150 |
|
20 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Kinnock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 141 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 216 Noes - 148 |
|
20 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Kinnock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 138 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 219 Noes - 144 |
|
27 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Kinnock voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 133 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 58 Noes - 138 |
|
27 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Kinnock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 139 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 210 Noes - 145 |
|
27 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Kinnock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 139 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 217 Noes - 145 |
|
27 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Kinnock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 153 Labour No votes vs 5 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 316 Noes - 165 |
|
30 Jun 2026 - National Security (State Threats) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Kinnock voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 136 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 150 Noes - 216 |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Monetary Policy
Asked by: Lord Kinnock (Labour - Life peer) Monday 6th July 2026 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the approach to quantitative tightening undertaken by the European Central Bank and US Federal Reserve, which allow the relevant bonds to mature rather than engaging in the sale of such bonds. Answered by Lord Livermore The Bank of England has operational independence from the Government to carry out its statutory responsibilities for monetary policy, including quantitative easing and quantitative tightening.
HM Treasury’s response to the Treasury Select Committee’s inquiry into QT set out that different unwind paces will impact the time profile of when losses are incurred but are expected to have little effect on total cost in present value terms. Therefore, all else equal, there is no reason to believe that holding gilts for longer would avoid these losses. Instead, a higher net interest cost would be incurred from holding the portfolio for longer. QT also reduces the sensitivity of the public finances to changes in interest rates.
Since October 2022, HM Treasury has transferred £107.64bn to the Bank of England to cover losses arising from the indemnity of the Asset Purchase Facility, the vehicle used to implement quantitative easing. This covers losses incurred from net interest costs and the sale and redemption of bonds as the portfolio is unwound. Since 2013, the Bank of England has transferred £123.85bn to HM Treasury, giving HM Treasury a net position of £16.21bn to date.
Data on these cash transfers are made publicly available by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) in its monthly Public Sector Finances publication. The data are available in the ONS data series ID MF7A in worksheet PSA9B. |
|
Monetary Policy
Asked by: Lord Kinnock (Labour - Life peer) Monday 6th July 2026 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask His Majesty's Government what has been the cost to public funds of the Treasury's arrangement to support the Bank of England practice of quantitative tightening since 2022. Answered by Lord Livermore The Bank of England has operational independence from the Government to carry out its statutory responsibilities for monetary policy, including quantitative easing and quantitative tightening.
HM Treasury’s response to the Treasury Select Committee’s inquiry into QT set out that different unwind paces will impact the time profile of when losses are incurred but are expected to have little effect on total cost in present value terms. Therefore, all else equal, there is no reason to believe that holding gilts for longer would avoid these losses. Instead, a higher net interest cost would be incurred from holding the portfolio for longer. QT also reduces the sensitivity of the public finances to changes in interest rates.
Since October 2022, HM Treasury has transferred £107.64bn to the Bank of England to cover losses arising from the indemnity of the Asset Purchase Facility, the vehicle used to implement quantitative easing. This covers losses incurred from net interest costs and the sale and redemption of bonds as the portfolio is unwound. Since 2013, the Bank of England has transferred £123.85bn to HM Treasury, giving HM Treasury a net position of £16.21bn to date.
Data on these cash transfers are made publicly available by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) in its monthly Public Sector Finances publication. The data are available in the ONS data series ID MF7A in worksheet PSA9B. |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
21 May 2026, 1:45 p.m. - House of Lords "course supported, as we know, by Lord Kinnock, unfortunately not now " Lord Razzall (Liberal Democrat) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
2 Jul 2026, 12:16 p.m. - House of Lords "come, and its particular pleasure to follow and speak after the noble Lord, Lord Kinnock. I'm conscious that I'm somewhat outside my " Lord Jay of Ewelme (Crossbench) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
2 Jul 2026, 12:30 p.m. - House of Lords "finish by thanking the noble Earl Lord Kinnock for introducing this " Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
2 Jul 2026, 1:13 p.m. - House of Lords "the Electoral Commission, and I thank the noble Earl Lord Kinnock for opening the debate and other " Lord Lemos, Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Housing, Communities and Local Government) (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
2 Jul 2026, 1:14 p.m. - House of Lords "general point, which I know other noble Lords have made, not least the noble Earl Lord Kinnock. There " Lord Lemos, Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Housing, Communities and Local Government) (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
2 Jul 2026, 1:20 p.m. - House of Lords "and improve enforcement. Can I turn to the points made by Lord Kinnock but also by Lord Kerr? The " Lord Lemos, Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Housing, Communities and Local Government) (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
King’s Speech
135 speeches (52,860 words) Thursday 21st May 2026 - Lords Chamber Ministry of Defence Mentions: 1: Lord Razzall (LD - Life peer) This is supported, as we know, by the noble Lord, Lord Kinnock, who unfortunately is not in his place.The - Link to Speech |
|
King’s Speech
17 speeches (10,770 words) Wednesday 13th May 2026 - Lords Chamber Leader of the House Mentions: 1: Lord Roe of West Wickham (Lab - Life peer) that.Sitting for a cup of tea with my political heroes, including Neil Kinnock—my noble friend Lord Kinnock - Link to Speech |