Lord Kinnock Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Lord Kinnock

Information between 14th July 2025 - 12th October 2025

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
15 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Kinnock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 148 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 282 Noes - 158
15 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Kinnock voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 138 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 106 Noes - 148
15 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Kinnock voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 144 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 214 Noes - 153
15 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Kinnock voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 143 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 98 Noes - 148
15 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Kinnock voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 148 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 215 Noes - 240
14 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Kinnock voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 137 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 161 Noes - 191
14 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Kinnock voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 144 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 65 Noes - 170
14 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Kinnock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 132 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 232 Noes - 137
16 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Kinnock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 122 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 180 Noes - 123
16 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Kinnock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 121 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 184 Noes - 123
16 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Kinnock voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 119 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 47 Noes - 121
16 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Kinnock voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 120 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 148 Noes - 155
16 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Kinnock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 152 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 304 Noes - 160
16 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Kinnock voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 133 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 100 Noes - 136
16 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Kinnock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 145 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 248 Noes - 150
21 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Kinnock voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 136 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 106 Noes - 140
21 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Kinnock voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 126 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 92 Noes - 130
21 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Kinnock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 147 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 266 Noes - 162
21 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Kinnock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 139 Labour No votes vs 3 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 216 Noes - 143


Written Answers
Government Securities
Asked by: Lord Kinnock (Labour - Life peer)
Friday 26th September 2025

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask His Majesty's Government what discussions they have had with the Bank of England about suspending its quantitative tightening policy of selling bonds accumulated through quantitative easing, as opposed to allowing maturing debt to expire.

Answered by Lord Livermore - Financial Secretary (HM Treasury)

The Bank of England has operational independence from the government to carry out its statutory responsibilities for monetary policy and financial stability. Monetary policy, including quantitative easing, is the responsibility of the independent Monetary Policy Committee at the Bank of England.

The separation of fiscal and monetary policy is a key feature of the UK’s economic framework, it is in line with international standards and essential for the effective delivery of monetary policy, so the government does not comment on the conduct or effectiveness of monetary policy.

Since October 2022, HM Treasury has transferred £93.32bn to the Bank of England to cover losses arising from the indemnity of the Asset Purchase Facility, the vehicle used to implement quantitative easing. This covers losses incurred from net interest costs and the sale and redemption of bonds as the portfolio is unwound. Since 2013, the Bank of England has transferred £123.85bn to HM Treasury, giving HM Treasury a net position of £30.53bn to date


Data on these cash transfers between HM Treasury and the Bank of England are made publicly available by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) in its monthly Public Sector Finances publication. The data are available in the ONS data series ID MF7A in worksheet PSA9B.

Government Securities
Asked by: Lord Kinnock (Labour - Life peer)
Friday 26th September 2025

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask His Majesty's Government what losses have been sustained by the Treasury since 2022 as a result of the Bank of England's decision to sell bonds as part of its policy of quantitative tightening.

Answered by Lord Livermore - Financial Secretary (HM Treasury)

The Bank of England has operational independence from the government to carry out its statutory responsibilities for monetary policy and financial stability. Monetary policy, including quantitative easing, is the responsibility of the independent Monetary Policy Committee at the Bank of England.

The separation of fiscal and monetary policy is a key feature of the UK’s economic framework, it is in line with international standards and essential for the effective delivery of monetary policy, so the government does not comment on the conduct or effectiveness of monetary policy.

Since October 2022, HM Treasury has transferred £93.32bn to the Bank of England to cover losses arising from the indemnity of the Asset Purchase Facility, the vehicle used to implement quantitative easing. This covers losses incurred from net interest costs and the sale and redemption of bonds as the portfolio is unwound. Since 2013, the Bank of England has transferred £123.85bn to HM Treasury, giving HM Treasury a net position of £30.53bn to date


Data on these cash transfers between HM Treasury and the Bank of England are made publicly available by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) in its monthly Public Sector Finances publication. The data are available in the ONS data series ID MF7A in worksheet PSA9B.




Lord Kinnock mentioned

Parliamentary Debates
House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill
184 speeches (24,276 words)
Consideration of Lords amendments
Thursday 4th September 2025 - Commons Chamber
Cabinet Office
Mentions:
1: Jonathan Davies (Lab - Mid Derbyshire) nation, the proposal that peers should retire at 80 would mean we would lose the contributions of Lord Kinnock - Link to Speech

Taxes
184 speeches (26,871 words)
Tuesday 15th July 2025 - Commons Chamber
HM Treasury
Mentions:
1: Bradley Thomas (Con - Bromsgrove) Only last week, Lord Kinnock said that Labour should be “willing to explore” such disastrous measures - Link to Speech

Welfare Spending
174 speeches (18,781 words)
Tuesday 15th July 2025 - Commons Chamber
Department for Work and Pensions
Mentions:
1: Adrian Ramsay (Green - Waveney Valley) that list his support for scrapping the cap, and will he join figures in his own party, such as Lord Kinnock - Link to Speech