Media: Ownership Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Lord Kinnock

Main Page: Lord Kinnock (Labour - Life peer)

Media: Ownership

Lord Kinnock Excerpts
Monday 10th October 2011

(13 years, 2 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Baroness Rawlings Portrait Baroness Rawlings
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, plurality in the context of media ownership refers to the number of owners and size of ownership of different media outlets and does not cover diversity, as the noble Baroness mentioned. I am sure all noble Lords agree that a healthy democracy needs correct information, and, in general, to be able to participate effectively in a political process, access is needed to all sides of the debate. However, this is unlikely to happen if the media are under the control of a too tightly restricted number of owners.

Lord Kinnock Portrait Lord Kinnock
- Hansard - -

My Lords, as the monopoly of opinion is the most fearful of all monopolies, is it not the case that the accretion of power in the media should at least be subject to the same tests of competition as all other forms of enterprise?

Baroness Rawlings Portrait Baroness Rawlings
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The noble Lord, Lord Kinnock, makes a very valid point. In most cases, competition rules will prevent unacceptable levels of media concentration. However, there is no guarantee of that, because competition rules address only the abuse of market power. It is possible for an organisation to have a very large share of the market but not abuse its position for unfair competitive advantage. This would be acceptable in competition terms but it could still cause very real worries from the point of view of media influence, as the noble Lord said.