All 2 Debates between Lord Keen of Elie and Lord Scriven

Probation Reform

Debate between Lord Keen of Elie and Lord Scriven
Thursday 16th May 2019

(5 years, 7 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Keen of Elie Portrait Lord Keen of Elie
- Hansard - -

I do not agree with the propositions advanced by the noble Lord at all, and I have confidence in these proposed reforms.

Lord Scriven Portrait Lord Scriven (LD)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, the Minister says there has been no cost to the taxpayer, but the taxpayer has had to pay £500 million extra, including the early closure of these contracts, which cost £170 million, which in turn included a cost of £115 million for waiving some fees. Is it not the case that there is an extra cost of £500 million to the taxpayer for bringing these contracts to an early close, and that they have not performed?

Lord Keen of Elie Portrait Lord Keen of Elie
- Hansard - -

No, with respect. The cost of these contracts was estimated at about £1 billion more than the actual cost incurred for the foreshortened contracts.

Central Courts IT System

Debate between Lord Keen of Elie and Lord Scriven
Wednesday 23rd January 2019

(5 years, 11 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Keen of Elie Portrait Lord Keen of Elie
- Hansard - -

My Lords, I was not involved directly in the preparation of this Statement. I was invited to repeat it in this House on the basis of information given to me. I cannot directly answer the question of who was consulted in the preparation of the Statement itself. If the noble Lord wishes I will write to him on the point—but if he has no desire for me to do so I will not.

Lord Scriven Portrait Lord Scriven (LD)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, less than three years ago there was a whole-Whitehall review of the £500 million contracts given to Atos for government IT systems. This is another potential catastrophe with an IT system that Atos has implemented in government. In the light of that, what government-wide review will now be done of Atos’s ability to provide IT services for government on such a scale?

Lord Keen of Elie Portrait Lord Keen of Elie
- Hansard - -

My Lords, this issue arose in the context not of the implementation of an IT system but of an existing system, in particular the corruption of part of the hardware, namely a routing server, which has now been replaced. Given that that has been identified and rectified, we would not contemplate launching the form of inquiry indicated by the noble Lord.