Debates between Lord Keen of Elie and Lord Campbell of Pittenweem during the 2019-2024 Parliament

Share Page
2017-2019 Parliament
View all Parliaments

Rule of Law: Law Officers

Debate between Lord Keen of Elie and Lord Campbell of Pittenweem
Tuesday 15th September 2020

(4 years, 3 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Share Debate
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Keen of Elie Portrait Lord Keen of Elie (Con)
- Hansard -
-

My Lords, I am not seeking to give a political justification for anything; I am providing a legal justification for saying that the UKIM Bill falls within the boundaries of international law, within the boundaries of our treaty obligations and within the boundaries of the rule of law.

Lord Campbell of Pittenweem Portrait Lord Campbell of Pittenweem (LD)
- Hansard -
- - Excerpts

My Lords, when the Advocate-General supported the withdrawal agreement in this House, did he find it as ambiguous and problematical as the Prime Minister now claims? If so, why did he vote for it?

Lord Keen of Elie Portrait Lord Keen of Elie (Con)
- Hansard -
-

My Lords, I was not concerned with either ambiguity or problems within the withdrawal agreement Bill; others may have taken a different view.

Return to start of debate - Return to top of page