Information between 6th June 2025 - 6th July 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
Division Votes |
---|
30 Jun 2025 - UK-Mauritius Agreement on the Chagos Archipelago - View Vote Context Lord Jones of Penybont voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 140 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 185 Noes - 205 |
1 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Jones of Penybont voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 93 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 23 Noes - 103 |
1 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Jones of Penybont voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 120 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 169 Noes - 176 |
1 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Jones of Penybont voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 112 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 45 Noes - 126 |
1 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Jones of Penybont voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 131 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 230 Noes - 137 |
1 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Jones of Penybont voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 139 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 253 Noes - 150 |
1 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Jones of Penybont voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 133 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 221 Noes - 196 |
2 Jul 2025 - House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Jones of Penybont voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 144 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 280 Noes - 243 |
2 Jul 2025 - House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Jones of Penybont voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 137 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 84 Noes - 263 |
2 Jul 2025 - House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Jones of Penybont voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 122 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 55 Noes - 234 |
11 Jun 2025 - Armed Forces Commissioner Bill - View Vote Context Lord Jones of Penybont voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 132 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 265 Noes - 161 |
11 Jun 2025 - Holocaust Memorial Bill - View Vote Context Lord Jones of Penybont voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 85 Labour No votes vs 4 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 83 Noes - 129 |
11 Jun 2025 - Holocaust Memorial Bill - View Vote Context Lord Jones of Penybont voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 79 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 83 Noes - 79 |
Written Answers |
---|
Nuclear Reactors: Finance
Asked by: Lord Jones of Penybont (Labour - Life peer) Thursday 19th June 2025 Question to the Department for Energy Security & Net Zero: To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to put revenue support mechanisms in place to support the development of advanced modular reactors. Answered by Lord Wilson of Sedgefield - Lord in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) The Government is providing a pathway for privately-led advanced nuclear projects. Great British Energy - Nuclear has been tasked with assessing proposals within a new framework, to be published shortly, with the National Wealth Fund exploring potential investment opportunities and the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero exploring revenue support for viable projects. |
Plutonium: Sellafield
Asked by: Lord Jones of Penybont (Labour - Life peer) Thursday 19th June 2025 Question to the Department for Energy Security & Net Zero: To ask His Majesty's Government why they have decided to dispose of 140 tonnes of civil plutonium stored at Sellafield instead of repurposing it for new energy generation. Answered by Lord Wilson of Sedgefield - Lord in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) I refer my noble Friend to the answer given by my noble Friend Lord Hunt of Kings Heath on 8th May 2025 to Question HL6800.
The Government took the decision to immobilise the UK’s civil separated plutonium inventory based on strategic, economic, technical and safety and security considerations. Immobilisation will put the material into a form which both reduces the long-term safety and security burden during storage and ensures it is suitable for disposal in a Geological Disposal Facility (GDF). Implementing a long-term solution for plutonium is essential to dealing with the UK’s nuclear legacy and leaving the environment safer for future generations. Furthermore, all current and planned UK reactors use uranium-based fuels.
|
Nuclear Power: Finance
Asked by: Lord Jones of Penybont (Labour - Life peer) Thursday 19th June 2025 Question to the Department for Energy Security & Net Zero: To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to fund advanced nuclear technologies through the generic design assessment process. Answered by Lord Wilson of Sedgefield - Lord in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) The costs of nuclear regulatory services, like Generic Design Assessment, are charged to companies in regulation. The Government part-funded 3 companies to undertake GDA for their Small Modular Reactor designs through the Low-Cost Nuclear Challenge and Future Nuclear Enabling Fund grant schemes. These are Rolls-Royce SMR, GE-Hitachi Nuclear Energy and Holtec Britain Ltd.
Looking forward, the government is providing a pathway for privately-led advanced nuclear projects. Great British Energy - Nuclear has been tasked with assessing proposals within a new framework, to be published shortly, with the National Wealth Fund exploring potential investment opportunities and the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero exploring revenue support for viable projects. |
Nuclear Reactors: Finance
Asked by: Lord Jones of Penybont (Labour - Life peer) Thursday 19th June 2025 Question to the Department for Energy Security & Net Zero: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of international best practice cases for funding advanced modular reactor development. Answered by Lord Wilson of Sedgefield - Lord in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) The Government actively monitors advanced nuclear developments in other countries for international best practice that could support the government’s missions. |
Cardiff Central Station
Asked by: Lord Jones of Penybont (Labour - Life peer) Wednesday 11th June 2025 Question to the Department for Transport: To ask His Majesty's Government how they plan to work with the Welsh Government to redevelop and refurbish Cardiff Central Railway Station. Answered by Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill - Minister of State (Department for Transport) Officials from both governments continue to work collaboratively on the Cardiff Central station improvement project, alongside partners from Transport for Wales and Network Rail, and overseen by Wales Rail Board. |