Information between 25th October 2025 - 14th November 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Tuesday 25th November 2025 Lord Jamieson (Conservative - Life peer) Oral questions - Main Chamber Subject: Fair Funding Review: housing and employment growth View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
28 Oct 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Jamieson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 155 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 184 Noes - 195 |
|
28 Oct 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Jamieson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 189 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 301 Noes - 153 |
|
28 Oct 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Jamieson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 158 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 240 Noes - 143 |
|
28 Oct 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Jamieson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 156 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 249 Noes - 142 |
|
28 Oct 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Jamieson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 174 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 267 Noes - 153 |
|
28 Oct 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Jamieson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 190 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 302 Noes - 159 |
|
29 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lord Jamieson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 106 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 133 Noes - 188 |
|
29 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lord Jamieson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 42 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 50 Noes - 115 |
|
29 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lord Jamieson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 42 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 52 Noes - 113 |
|
29 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lord Jamieson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 158 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 260 Noes - 141 |
|
27 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lord Jamieson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 144 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 243 Noes - 157 |
|
27 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lord Jamieson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 36 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 49 Noes - 110 |
|
27 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lord Jamieson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 41 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 46 Noes - 133 |
|
27 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lord Jamieson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 118 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 166 Noes - 139 |
|
27 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lord Jamieson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 125 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 196 Noes - 137 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Jamieson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 147 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 161 Noes - 144 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Jamieson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 149 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 157 Noes - 200 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Jamieson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 147 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 159 Noes - 194 |
|
3 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lord Jamieson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 144 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 162 Noes - 178 |
|
3 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Jamieson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 164 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 182 Noes - 227 |
|
3 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lord Jamieson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 60 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 72 Noes - 147 |
|
3 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lord Jamieson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 61 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 107 Noes - 136 |
|
3 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lord Jamieson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 37 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 58 Noes - 125 |
|
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Jamieson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 179 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 193 Noes - 236 |
|
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Jamieson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 181 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 201 Noes - 238 |
|
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Jamieson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 185 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 207 Noes - 240 |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
New Towns: Housing
Asked by: Lord Jamieson (Conservative - Life peer) Tuesday 11th November 2025 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Statement by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage on 13 October (HLWS946), whether additional homes already committed to in a local plan will count towards the ministerial commitment to get spades in the ground on at least three new towns in this Parliament. Answered by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) On 28 September, the government published the New Towns Taskforce report as well as its initial response.
As set out in their report, the Taskforce have prioritised sites where housing can be delivered quickly to reflect the urgent need for housing and with high quality placemaking standards. New towns are necessarily long-term projects which should continue to grow over decades to come, but government is determined to begin work as soon as possible, with spades in the ground on at least three new towns in this Parliament.
The government takes on board the Taskforce’s recommendations to consider the interaction between new towns and housing targets ahead of its fuller response. We want to ensure that the right incentives are in place to support proactive local authorities to work with us to bring new towns forward.
|
|
New Towns: Housing
Asked by: Lord Jamieson (Conservative - Life peer) Tuesday 11th November 2025 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Statement by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage on 13 October (HLWS946), for each identified new town, how many of the additional homes identified are already committed to in a local plan. Answered by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) On 28 September, the government published the New Towns Taskforce report as well as its initial response.
As set out in their report, the Taskforce have prioritised sites where housing can be delivered quickly to reflect the urgent need for housing and with high quality placemaking standards. New towns are necessarily long-term projects which should continue to grow over decades to come, but government is determined to begin work as soon as possible, with spades in the ground on at least three new towns in this Parliament.
The government takes on board the Taskforce’s recommendations to consider the interaction between new towns and housing targets ahead of its fuller response. We want to ensure that the right incentives are in place to support proactive local authorities to work with us to bring new towns forward.
|
|
Sites of Special Scientific Interest: Ebbsfleet
Asked by: Lord Jamieson (Conservative - Life peer) Tuesday 11th November 2025 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by the Minister of State (Housing, Communities and Local Government) on 7 April (HC40908), what communications representatives of the Ebbsfleet Development Corporation have made to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government on (1) the Swanscombe Peninsula Site of Special Scientific Interest designation or (2) the presence or absence of distinguished jumping spiders within land owned by the Development Corporation for development, since 4 July 2024. Answered by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) The Ministry of Housing Communities and Local Government, as the sponsor department, has regular discussions with Ebbsfleet Development Corporation on matters relevant to its core objectives including the impact of the Site of Special Scientific Interest.
|
|
New Towns
Asked by: Lord Jamieson (Conservative - Life peer) Tuesday 11th November 2025 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Statement by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage on 13 October (HLWS946), what evidential basis or metric will be used to determine when a new town has spades in the ground. Answered by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) On 28 September, the government published the New Towns Taskforce report as well as its initial response.
As set out in their report, the Taskforce have prioritised sites where housing can be delivered quickly to reflect the urgent need for housing and with high quality placemaking standards. New towns are necessarily long-term projects which should continue to grow over decades to come, but government is determined to begin work as soon as possible, with spades in the ground on at least three new towns in this Parliament.
The government takes on board the Taskforce’s recommendations to consider the interaction between new towns and housing targets ahead of its fuller response. We want to ensure that the right incentives are in place to support proactive local authorities to work with us to bring new towns forward.
|
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
30 Oct 2025, 12:15 p.m. - House of Lords ">> But I actually agree with what the noble Lord Jamieson just said. >> I thank the noble Baroness. >> Lady Pinnock for. " Baroness Taylor of Stevenage, Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Housing, Communities and Local Government) (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
29 Oct 2025, 12:01 p.m. - House of Lords "worked on by Defra. It is due for publication next year, and in response to the noble Lord Jamieson question about Ramsar, we have a " Baroness Taylor of Stevenage, Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Housing, Communities and Local Government) (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
10 Nov 2025, 3:56 p.m. - House of Lords "Baroness Scott of Bybrook and the noble Lords Lord Jamieson, Lord Roborough and Lord Blencathra for " Baroness Taylor of Stevenage, Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Housing, Communities and Local Government) (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
10 Nov 2025, 4:04 p.m. - House of Lords "Lord Jamieson, Lord Moylan, Lord Bourne, Lord Blencathra and the " Baroness Scott of Bybrook (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
3 Nov 2025, 8:25 p.m. - House of Lords "co-signed alongside my noble friend Lord Jamieson ensuring that development corporations have " Baroness Scott of Bybrook (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Planning and Infrastructure Bill
18 speeches (3,370 words) 3rd reading Monday 10th November 2025 - Lords Chamber Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government Mentions: 1: Baroness Taylor of Stevenage (Lab - Life peer) Opposition Front Bench, namely the noble Baroness, Lady Scott of Bybrook, and the noble Lords, Lord Jamieson - Link to Speech 2: None In particular, I put on record my thanks to my noble friends Lord Jamieson, Lord Moylan, Lord Blencathra - Link to Speech |
|
Planning and Infrastructure Bill
127 speeches (26,896 words) Report stage Monday 3rd November 2025 - Lords Chamber Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government Mentions: 1: Baroness Scott of Bybrook (Con - Life peer) Minister that I think these important questions need answers tonight.Alongside my noble friend Lord Jamieson - Link to Speech |
|
Town and Country Planning (Crown Development Applications) (Procedure and Written Representations) Order 2025
9 speeches (2,020 words) Thursday 30th October 2025 - Lords Chamber Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government Mentions: 1: Baroness Taylor of Stevenage (Lab - Life peer) the Chamber debating the Planning and Infrastructure Bill, but I agree with what the noble Lord, Lord Jamieson - Link to Speech 2: None for new Crown development routes in the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, as the noble Lord, Lord Jamieson - Link to Speech |
|
Planning and Infrastructure Bill
76 speeches (17,438 words) Report stage part one Wednesday 29th October 2025 - Lords Chamber Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government Mentions: 1: Baroness Taylor of Stevenage (Lab - Life peer) The noble Lord, Lord Jamieson, asked about Ramsar. - Link to Speech 2: Baroness Taylor of Stevenage (Lab - Life peer) My Lords, I will put the noble Lord, Lord Jamieson, out of his misery. - Link to Speech |
|
Planning and Infrastructure Bill
94 speeches (18,915 words) Report stage: Part 2 Monday 27th October 2025 - Lords Chamber Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government Mentions: 1: Lord Lansley (Con - Life peer) I humbly say to the Minister what I said previously, along with my noble friend Lord Jamieson, about - Link to Speech 2: Baroness Taylor of Stevenage (Lab - Life peer) I remind the noble Lord, Lord Jamieson, of the same issue. - Link to Speech |
|
Planning and Infrastructure Bill
100 speeches (26,357 words) Report stage: Part 1 Monday 27th October 2025 - Lords Chamber Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government Mentions: 1: Baroness Pinnock (LD - Life peer) this debate, but I am thoroughly disappointed by the remarks of the Minister and the noble Lord, Lord Jamieson - Link to Speech |