Lord Jamieson Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Lord Jamieson

Information between 20th July 2025 - 30th July 2025

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
21 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Jamieson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 75 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 92 Noes - 130
21 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Jamieson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 92 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 106 Noes - 140
21 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Jamieson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 160 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 216 Noes - 143
21 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Jamieson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 191 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 266 Noes - 162
22 Jul 2025 - Enterprise Act 2002 (Mergers Involving Newspaper Enterprises and Foreign Powers) Regulations 2025 - View Vote Context
Lord Jamieson voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 100 Conservative No votes vs 41 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 155 Noes - 267
23 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Jamieson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 173 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 271 Noes - 138
23 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Jamieson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 181 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 290 Noes - 143
23 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Jamieson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 73 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 85 Noes - 127
23 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Jamieson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 148 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 171 Noes - 189
23 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Jamieson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 171 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 198 Noes - 198


Speeches
Lord Jamieson speeches from: Voting at 16
Lord Jamieson contributed 1 speech (67 words)
Thursday 24th July 2025 - Lords Chamber
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Lord Jamieson speeches from: Planning and Infrastructure Bill
Lord Jamieson contributed 9 speeches (1,882 words)
Committee stage
Thursday 24th July 2025 - Lords Chamber
Department for Transport


Written Answers
Heathrow Airport: Planning Permission
Asked by: Lord Jamieson (Conservative - Life peer)
Wednesday 23rd July 2025

Question to the Department for Transport:

To ask His Majesty's Government, with reference to Appendix 2, page 61, Annex 1: Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects reform, of the Planning and Infrastructure Bill: Impact assessment (published May 2025) Appendix 2, page 61, and the November 2027 target date for the updated Airports National Policy Statement, whether they anticipate that the infrastructure planning application for the Heathrow Airport expansion can be submitted before the publication and ratification of the revised Airports National Policy Statement.

Answered by Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill - Minister of State (Department for Transport)

The Government has invited proposals for a third runway at Heathrow to be brought forward by the summer. Once proposals have been received, the Government will review the Airports National Policy Statement in line with the requirements of the Planning Act 2008.

When the ANPS has been reviewed, and depending on the outcome of the review, it will be for scheme promoters to decide when to submit a Development Consent Order application for a third runway scheme.

Planning Permission
Asked by: Lord Jamieson (Conservative - Life peer)
Wednesday 23rd July 2025

Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government:

To ask His Majesty's Government what guidance has been provided by either the Ministry for Housing, Communities and Local Government or the Planning Inspectorate on whether a planning inspector is able to give less weight to planning representations if they believe that the representations are a result of, or have been fettered by, foreign interference.

Answered by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

The weight attaching to a representation is a matter for the decision-maker.

In dealing with the application, officials and Ministers will act in accordance with published propriety guidance on planning casework decisions. Further information is available here.

Green Belt: Greater London
Asked by: Lord Jamieson (Conservative - Life peer)
Wednesday 23rd July 2025

Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government:

To ask His Majesty's Government, with reference to the Mayor of London press release of 9 May, Mayor: We must build on the green belt to help fix London’s housing crisis, whether the Government’s support for reviewing Green Belt in Greater London includes support for reviewing Metropolitan Open Land in London.

Answered by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

The designation, management and review of Metropolitan Open Land is a matter for the Mayor of London.

Planning: Security
Asked by: Lord Jamieson (Conservative - Life peer)
Wednesday 23rd July 2025

Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government:

To ask His Majesty's Government, with reference to paragraph 19 of the Guidance on planning propriety: planning casework decisions published in December 2021, and MHCLG guidance on Crown Development and Urgent Crown development regarding security sensitive information in planning applications,  whether all representations made by other government departments on a called-in planning application or recovered appeal, including on sensitive security matters, must be disclosed to the applicant.

Answered by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

Representations on planning applications are dealt with in accordance with paragraphs 18, 19 and 20 of the published propriety guidance on planning casework decisions which can be found here.

Ministers are able to issue a direction under section 321 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 on an application where required. This allows evidence to only be heard by specified persons.

Chinese Embassy: Planning Permission
Asked by: Lord Jamieson (Conservative - Life peer)
Monday 28th July 2025

Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government:

To ask His Majesty's Government what discussions they have had with the government of the United States of America, including the US Embassy in London, relating to the proposed Chinese Embassy development at the Royal Mint in London.

Answered by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

The Government regularly engages with representatives of foreign governments, including the United States government, to discuss a broad range of issues. The details of these discussions are not made public.




Lord Jamieson mentioned

Live Transcript

Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm.

21 Jul 2025, 4:30 p.m. - House of Lords
"particular to the opposition of the frontbench namely that noble Baroness Lady Scott of Bybrook and the noble Lord Lord Jamieson for their robust and constructive challenge throughout the passage of the bill. I would like to thank "
Baroness Taylor of Stevenage, Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Housing, Communities and Local Government) (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript
21 Jul 2025, 4:38 p.m. - House of Lords
"perhaps just a little, by the determined double act of Baroness Scott and Lord Jamieson, I admire "
Baroness Thornhill (Liberal Democrat) - View Video - View Transcript
24 Jul 2025, 1:42 p.m. - House of Lords
"his point. Lord Jamieson, he is "
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript
24 Jul 2025, 6:43 p.m. - House of Lords
"and amendment 68 not moved. That brings us to the group amendment beginning with amendment 69, after clause 47 amendment 69 Lord Jamieson. "
Lord Khan of Burnley, Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Housing, Communities and Local Government) (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript


Parliamentary Debates
Planning and Infrastructure Bill
173 speeches (40,427 words)
Committee stage
Thursday 24th July 2025 - Lords Chamber
Department for Transport
Mentions:
1: Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Lab - Life peer) apply to major infrastructure projects as well—but I take the noble Lord’s point.The noble Lord, Lord Jamieson - Link to Speech
2: Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill (Lab - Life peer) The noble Lord, Lord Jamieson, asked by when this review will be completed, and I can assure him that - Link to Speech
3: Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill (Lab - Life peer) So I kindly ask the noble Lord, Lord Jamieson, to beg leave to withdraw his amendment.I thank the noble - Link to Speech

Renters’ Rights Bill
17 speeches (2,562 words)
Monday 21st July 2025 - Lords Chamber
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Mentions:
1: Baroness Taylor of Stevenage (Lab - Life peer) Opposition Front Bench, namely the noble Baroness, Lady Scott of Bybrook, and the noble Lord, Lord Jamieson - Link to Speech
2: Baroness Scott of Bybrook (Con - Life peer) I thank them sincerely for the fantastic support they have given me and my noble friend Lord Jamieson - Link to Speech
3: Baroness Thornhill (LD - Life peer) just a little by the determined double act of the noble Baroness, Lady Scott, and the noble Lord, Lord Jamieson - Link to Speech
4: Lord Hacking (Lab - Excepted Hereditary) Lady Thornhill, on dealing with the length and complexity of the Bill, as well as the noble Lord, Lord Jamieson—I - Link to Speech



Bill Documents
Jul. 22 2025
HL Bill 110-II Second marshalled list for Committee
Planning and Infrastructure Bill 2024-26
Amendment Paper

Found: Planning and Infrastructure Bill 26 LORD JAMIESON 69_ After Clause 47, insert the following new Clause

Jul. 21 2025
HL Bill 110-I(d) Amendments for Committee (Supplementary to the Marshalled List)
Planning and Infrastructure Bill 2024-26
Amendment Paper

Found: After Clause 47 LORD JAMIESON _ After Clause 47, insert the following new Clause— “Street works: guarantee