All 2 Debates between Lord Inglewood and Lord Liddle

European Union (Withdrawal) Bill

Debate between Lord Inglewood and Lord Liddle
Lord Liddle Portrait Lord Liddle
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Would my noble friend give way? I want to be helpful to his argument. He refers to Professor Minford and the cost of EU regulation. It is only by making the extreme assumption that all these regulations will be abolished that the tiny number of economic studies that demonstrate some growth benefit from Brexit are able to get to that number. Those studies are quoted very frequently from the Front Bench opposite as examples of the fact that some economists differ from the consensus, but in fact that difference depends on the assumption that we would scrap every single piece of EU social protection.

Infrastructure Planning (Radioactive Waste Geological Disposal Facilities) Order 2015

Debate between Lord Inglewood and Lord Liddle
Wednesday 25th February 2015

(9 years, 9 months ago)

Grand Committee
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lord Liddle Portrait Lord Liddle
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I think that I talked about—I hope that I did, anyway—what is commonly referred to as the nuclear dump. That is certainly how the local paper refers to it. I also emphasise to the Minister that, whenever the issue of the dump comes up, I point out that Cumbria is home to an extremely dangerous dump on the existing Sellafield site, about which something has to be done as a matter of urgency.

Lord Inglewood Portrait Lord Inglewood
- Hansard - -

I hope that I may be allowed to intervene in support of the noble Lord, Lord Liddle. It is indeed the case that this is known in the general locality as the nuclear dump. I must put my hands up and say, “Mea culpa”, as I am chairman of the newspaper company to which the noble Lord referred. However, we on the board do not exercise editorial control.