Alcohol

Debate between Lord Imbert and Lord Strathclyde

Thursday 2nd February 2012 Lords Chamber

[Baroness Massey of Darwen]

My Lords—

[Lord Strathclyde]

My Lords, there is time for both noble Lords. Perhaps we may start with the noble Lord, Lord Imbert.

[Lord Imbert]

In the light of the 60,000 alcohol-related calls answered by the London Ambulance Service alone and the 18,500 alcohol-related crimes of violence in London alone in one year, does that not mean that we should introduce a compulsory alcohol sobriety testing scheme which magistrates can use to sentence in order to reduce this awful number of offences?

Public Disorder: Uninsured Claimants

Debate between Lord Imbert and Lord Strathclyde

Monday 19th December 2011 Lords Chamber

[Lord Imbert]

My Lords, does the Minister agree that the Riot (Damages) Act, which was passed in 1886 for a different society from the one that we have today, is anachronistic, outdated and unfair? The police service has had its budget cut by 20 per cent this year. How can it afford up to £200 million in compensation? The Act has the connotation of blame. If we are looking for blame for the riots, should we look at the economic policies of successive Governments in failing to provide employment?

May I draw a picture of a single mother, living on the 13th floor of a block of council flats with three teenage children? She starts work at 5 am every morning as a cleaner, does another job in the afternoon and comes home to hungry and cold children, yet we blame her for not looking after them. They have never, in their whole lives, had a new pair of trainers but now have an opportunity. As far as the money is concerned—

[Lord Strathclyde]

The noble Lord really must bring his question to an end.

[Lord Imbert]

What about the £200 million or so that the Government will spend on appointing political commissars in the police service next year?