Public Disorder: Uninsured Claimants Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Home Office

Public Disorder: Uninsured Claimants

Lord Strathclyde Excerpts
Monday 19th December 2011

(12 years, 10 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Imbert Portrait Lord Imbert
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, does the Minister agree that the Riot (Damages) Act, which was passed in 1886 for a different society from the one that we have today, is anachronistic, outdated and unfair? The police service has had its budget cut by 20 per cent this year. How can it afford up to £200 million in compensation? The Act has the connotation of blame. If we are looking for blame for the riots, should we look at the economic policies of successive Governments in failing to provide employment?

May I draw a picture of a single mother, living on the 13th floor of a block of council flats with three teenage children? She starts work at 5 am every morning as a cleaner, does another job in the afternoon and comes home to hungry and cold children, yet we blame her for not looking after them. They have never, in their whole lives, had a new pair of trainers but now have an opportunity. As far as the money is concerned—

Lord Strathclyde Portrait Lord Strathclyde
- Hansard - -

The noble Lord really must bring his question to an end.

Lord Imbert Portrait Lord Imbert
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

What about the £200 million or so that the Government will spend on appointing political commissars in the police service next year?