Debates between Lord Horam and Lord Davies of Stamford during the 2010-2015 Parliament

Criminal Justice and Courts Bill

Debate between Lord Horam and Lord Davies of Stamford
Monday 28th July 2014

(10 years, 4 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Horam Portrait Lord Horam (Con)
- Hansard - -

My Lords—

Lord Davies of Stamford Portrait Lord Davies of Stamford (Lab)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

With great respect, I think that it may be our turn.

Lord Horam Portrait Lord Horam
- Hansard - -

I do not think that anyone on this side has spoken yet.

Everyone who has spoken so far has been a lawyer, with the exception of the noble Baroness, Lady Lister. I am not a lawyer; I am an economist, but perhaps I introduce a rather separate vein of thinking into this debate, which is extremely interesting and very important for the conduct of government.

The issue that concerns me as an economist and as a previous government Minister is delay. Almost all judicial review cases involve considerable delay. Indeed, the noble Baroness, Lady Lister, rightly and very fairly mentioned the report of the Joint Committee on Human Rights which went into the whole business of judicial review. In that case, the Government’s response indicated several instances where there had been great delay as a consequence of judicial review cases. I will not go through a long list, as that would weary the Committee, but I shall give some examples. A development of 360 homes in Carmarthenshire was delayed by 18 months. A development in east London which would have created 500 jobs was delayed by 15 months. The expansion of Bristol Airport was delayed. Very often, in the judicial review in question, the case was found to have no merit whatever, but there was still delay.