Lord Hollick Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Lord Hollick

Information between 2nd January 2026 - 22nd January 2026

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
5 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Hollick voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 120 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 194 Noes - 130
5 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Hollick voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 120 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 131 Noes - 127
5 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Hollick voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 121 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 210 Noes - 131
5 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Hollick voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 123 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 168 Noes - 178
5 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Hollick voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 105 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 132 Noes - 124
6 Jan 2026 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Hollick voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 125 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 204 Noes - 136
6 Jan 2026 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Hollick voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 133 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 180 Noes - 219
6 Jan 2026 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Hollick voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 130 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 182 Noes - 209
6 Jan 2026 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Hollick voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 122 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 134 Noes - 185
12 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Hollick voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 147 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 201 Noes - 169
14 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Hollick voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 152 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 213 Noes - 211
14 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Hollick voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 162 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 278 Noes - 176
19 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Hollick voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 149 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 159 Noes - 153
19 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Hollick voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 155 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 232 Noes - 160
19 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Hollick voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 154 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 216 Noes - 161
19 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Hollick voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 156 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 235 Noes - 164
19 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Hollick voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 151 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 148 Noes - 156



Lord Hollick - Select Committee Information

Calendar
Wednesday 21st January 2026 10 a.m.
Financial Services Regulation Committee - Private Meeting
View calendar - Add to calendar
Wednesday 28th January 2026 10 a.m.
Financial Services Regulation Committee - Private Meeting
View calendar - Add to calendar
Wednesday 4th February 2026 10 a.m.
Financial Services Regulation Committee - Oral evidence
Subject: Growth and proposed regulation of stablecoins in the UK
At 10:05am: Oral evidence
Chris Giles - Journalist at Financial Times
At 11:15am: Oral evidence
Professor Arthur E. Wilmarth, Jr.
View calendar - Add to calendar
Wednesday 11th February 2026 10 a.m.
Financial Services Regulation Committee - Oral evidence
Subject: Growth and proposed regulation of stablecoins in the UK
View calendar - Add to calendar


Select Committee Documents
Thursday 8th January 2026
Correspondence - Letter from Lucy Rigby KC MP, Economic Secretary to the Treasury, to Lord Forsyth of Drumlean regarding the Committee’s inquiry into the growth of private markets in the UK following reforms introduced after 2008 (18 December 2025)

Financial Services Regulation Committee


Select Committee Inquiry
28 Jan 2026
Growth and proposed regulation of stablecoins in the UK
Financial Services Regulation Committee (Select)

Submit Evidence (by 11 Mar 2026)


This inquiry will examine the development of, and proposed regulatory response to, stablecoins in the UK. In particular, the inquiry will examine the extent to which stablecoins might disrupt the traditional models of provision of financial services, including for banking and payments services. The inquiry will also assess the potential opportunities and risks that the growth of stablecoins might have on UK’s financial services sector, and whether the Bank of England and FCA’s proposed regulatory frameworks provide measured and proportionate responses to these risks.