Information between 18th February 2025 - 10th March 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
Division Votes |
---|
26 Feb 2025 - Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Hendy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 117 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 86 Noes - 167 |
25 Feb 2025 - National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hendy voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 139 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 182 Noes - 144 |
26 Feb 2025 - Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Hendy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 134 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 177 Noes - 228 |
25 Feb 2025 - National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hendy voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 143 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 189 Noes - 151 |
25 Feb 2025 - National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hendy voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 143 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 199 Noes - 149 |
25 Feb 2025 - National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hendy voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 145 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 235 Noes - 152 |
26 Feb 2025 - Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Hendy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 142 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 189 Noes - 232 |
24 Feb 2025 - Online Safety Act 2023 (Category 1, Category 2A and Category 2B Threshold Conditions) Regulations 2025 - View Vote Context Lord Hendy voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 53 Labour No votes vs 3 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 86 Noes - 55 |
25 Feb 2025 - National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hendy voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 143 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 235 Noes - 149 |
25 Feb 2025 - National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hendy voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 159 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 305 Noes - 175 |
25 Feb 2025 - National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hendy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 145 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 77 Noes - 153 |
25 Feb 2025 - National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hendy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 153 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 97 Noes - 169 |
4 Mar 2025 - Terrorism (Protection of Premises) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hendy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 163 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 213 Noes - 249 |
4 Mar 2025 - Terrorism (Protection of Premises) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hendy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 160 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 214 Noes - 248 |
4 Mar 2025 - Terrorism (Protection of Premises) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hendy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 155 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 200 Noes - 236 |
5 Mar 2025 - Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Hendy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 137 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 174 Noes - 207 |
5 Mar 2025 - Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Hendy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 131 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 146 Noes - 189 |
Calendar |
---|
Wednesday 5th March 2025 2 p.m. Welsh Affairs Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Rail Infrastructure in Wales At 2:30pm: Oral evidence The Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill CBE - Minister for Rail at Department for Transport Nick Millington - Route Director Wales at Network Rail Farha Sheikh - Interim Director for Rail Infrastructure North and West at Department for Transport View calendar - Add to calendar |
Parliamentary Debates |
---|
Rail Interoperability
1 speech (1,033 words) Wednesday 5th March 2025 - Written Statements Department for Transport Mentions: 1: Simon Lightwood (LAB - Wakefield and Rothwell) The Minister of State for Transport, my noble Friend Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill, has made the following - Link to Speech |
Domestic Abusers: Reoffending
19 speeches (1,532 words) Monday 24th February 2025 - Lords Chamber Home Office Mentions: 1: Lord Hanson of Flint (Lab - Life peer) My noble friend Lord Hendy, the Transport Minister, is sat next to me on the Bench today and will have - Link to Speech |
Written Answers |
---|
Manchester Airport: Railways
Asked by: Lord Scriven (Liberal Democrat - Life peer) Tuesday 4th March 2025 Question to the Department for Transport: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill on 18 February (HL4719), whether they were (1) part of the Manchester Task Force, or (2) consulted by them, with regards to the withdrawal of the direct Sheffield to Manchester Airport train; and if so, whether they supported the decision. Answered by Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill - Minister of State (Department for Transport) The Manchester Task Force (MTF) began meeting in February 2020, made up of Department for Transport, Network Rail, train operators, Rail North Partnership, Transport for the North and Transport for Greater Manchester. Through gathering evidence, developing options and publicly consulting, the task force identified a range of short and long-term actions to improve the performance of the railway in Manchester/across the North and support future growth in passengers.
The task force identified the Sheffield-Manchester Airport service, which reversed at Manchester Piccadilly, consuming two train paths in each direction, as one of the worst performing, with a significant impact on delays across the network.
The new timetable developed by MTF has delivered improvements in reliability of around 30 per cent, and the task force concept is now being used to resolve issues on the East Coast main line. As new infrastructure is realised and longer trains allow for a greater capacity with less congestion, we will look at services that could be reintroduced, possibly including direct services from Sheffield to the Airport, although there could be other towns and cities making a case for their pre-2022 direct connections to be restored as well. |
Crossrail 2 Line
Asked by: Baroness Pidgeon (Liberal Democrat - Life peer) Tuesday 4th March 2025 Question to the Department for Transport: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill on 13 February (HL5039), what is the latest status of any revisions to the Crossrail 2 safeguarded route proposed by Transport for London in 2020 which are yet to be approved; and what is the timescale and next steps to complete the safeguarding of such revisions. Answered by Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill - Minister of State (Department for Transport) As previously advised, development of Crossrail 2 was paused in 2020. Whilst the department currently has no plans to move forward with Crossrail 2, the route remains safeguarded to protect it from conflicting development and officials from my department regularly have discussions with Transport for London regarding this scheme and their other transport priorities. |
Heathrow Airport
Asked by: Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green Party - Life peer) Tuesday 18th February 2025 Question to the Department for Transport: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the reply by Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill on 3 February (HL Deb cols 474–5), whether they will publish the analysis which suggests that a third runway is compatible with their net zero target. Answered by Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill - Minister of State (Department for Transport) DfT analysis shows that we can achieve aviation net zero 2050 under a range of assumptions about future technology development, without the government needing to intervene directly to limit airport expansion. This analysis is set out in the technical annex of the Jet Zero Strategy, which is published on gov.uk. |
Department Publications - Transparency |
---|
Wednesday 19th February 2025
Cabinet Office Source Page: Register of Ministers’ Gifts and Hospitality: July to October 2024 Document: (webpage) Found: candle, perfume Received Qatar Airways Above limit Held by department Department for Transport Lord Hendy |
Wednesday 19th February 2025
Cabinet Office Source Page: Register of Ministers’ Gifts and Hospitality: July to October 2024 Document: (webpage) Found: Transport Louise Haigh Nil Return Nil Return Nil Return Nil Return Nil Return Department for Transport Lord Hendy |
Wednesday 19th February 2025
Cabinet Office Source Page: Register of Ministers’ Gifts and Hospitality: December 2024 Document: (webpage) Found: Heidi Alexander Nil Return Nil Return Nil Return Nil Return Nil Return Department for Transport Lord Hendy |
Wednesday 19th February 2025
Cabinet Office Source Page: Register of Ministers’ Gifts and Hospitality: December 2024 Document: (webpage) Found: Alexander Nil Return Nil Return Nil Return Nil Return Nil Return Nil Return Department for Transport Lord Hendy |
Deposited Papers |
---|
Monday 3rd March 2025
Department for Transport Source Page: Letter dated 27/02/2025 from Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill to Baroness Boycott regarding a question concerning pavement robots raised during a parliamentary question on e-scooters. 1p. Document: Lord_Hendy_to_Baroness_Boycott_on_pavement_robots.docx (webpage) Found: Letter dated 27/02/2025 from Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill to Baroness Boycott regarding a question concerning |
Monday 3rd March 2025
Department for Transport Source Page: Letter dated 27/02/2025 from Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill to Lord Rogan regarding a parliamentary question on e-scooters: question raised concerning consulting enforcement bodies in Northern Ireland on any change to the legal status of e-scooters. 1p. Document: Lord_Hendy_to_Lord_Rogan-UK_enforcement_consultation-e-scooters.docx (webpage) Found: Letter dated 27/02/2025 from Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill to Lord Rogan regarding a parliamentary question |